LAWS12063 - Legal Drafting

Showing: 2026 HE Term 2
General Information

Unit Synopsis

Effective, professional communication is central to legal practice. Lawyers must be able to think critically, communicate effectively with clients, opponents and the courts and also draft legal documents with precision. This unit develops these essential legal skills by providing an authentic, practice-based learning experience. In this unit you will undertake a variety of tasks that newly qualified lawyers are likely to undertake, such as drafting pleadings, affidavits, contracts, and letters of advice. You will also refine your oral communication skills by exploring strategies for effective client interviewing and persuasive advocacy.

Details

Level Undergraduate
Unit Level 2
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 4
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Pre-requisite of 24 credit points of law units including LAWS11057, LAWS11066 & LAWS11069.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 2 - 2026

Term 1 - 2027 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Online Quiz(zes) 10%
2. Practical Assessment 60%
3. Portfolio 30%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

Previous Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: SUTE comments and informal feedback
Feedback:
Some students identify that they do not keep on top of the weekly tasks because they are not required to submit anything until the end. This also means that the peer review exercises are often rushed and completed (if at all) shortly before the deadline.

Recommendation:
Explore with the Learning and Teaching team whether any teaching and learning assets (i.e. in Moodle) can be leveraged so that students submit a compilation of drafting tasks across the term while also requiring students to engage in peer review and collaborative learning on a regular basis.

Action Taken:
A potential Moodle tool has been identified and will be trialed in 2027.
Source: Tutor reflection
Feedback:
Although one module is dedicated to learning the benefits and pitfalls of using generative AI, students should not rely on generative AI to build their portfolio or complete the practical assessment task as they need to first acquire a sufficient level of competency in drafting to be able to recognise any drafting issues produced by generative AI. The assessment design must therefore include components which cannot be completed through reliance on generative AI alone.

Recommendation:
Incorporate an oral component into the assessment design.

Action Taken:
One of the written assessments now includes a client interview task.
Source: Student feedback, tutor reflection
Feedback:
Some students who had not nominated a partner found it difficult to coordinate a suitable time to conduct the client interview with their allocated partner and this meant some students did not complete the client interview until shortly before the deadline, leaving little time to conduct research and prepare the letter of advice

Recommendation:
Consider imposing two deadlines in the assessment, the first for the client interview video upload followed by a second deadline for the letter of advice to ensure those who conduct the client interview close to the deadline still have sufficient time to draft the letter of advice.

Action Taken:
In Progress
Source: Staff reflection
Feedback:
A curriculum review has identified the incorporation of a client interview into another second year unit, which provides an opportunity for one of the two units to focus on another oral communication task instead.

Recommendation:
Work with colleagues and the Learning & Teaching Coordinator to identify if the oral component of the assessment should be rotated with/changed to another type of oral communication assessment, such as an oral viva or advocacy exercise etc.

Action Taken:
In Progress
Unit Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Communicate effectively both orally and in writing
  2. Apply the principles of plain English drafting, principles of interpretation, and drafting conventions to create legal documents that comply with the client’s instructions and the objectives of the document
  3. Reflect critically on written work and provide comprehensive feedback to others through a peer review process.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Online Quiz(zes) •
2 - Practical Assessment • • •
3 - Portfolio • • •
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
• Introductory Level
• Intermediate Level
• Graduate Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Communication • • •
2 - Problem Solving • •
3 - Critical Thinking •
4 - Information Literacy •
5 - Team Work •
6 - Information Technology Competence • •
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
• Introductory Level
• Intermediate Level
• Graduate Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10