Unit Synopsis
In this unit, you will learn key concepts of Information and Communication Technology Project Management from both a traditional waterfall and Agile perspective. You will apply project management principles and use project management software with the aim of delivering successful projects. Industry standards, quality assurance, professional ethics, social, cultural, and legal issues relevant to the theories and principles of project management will also be covered.
Details
| Level | Undergraduate |
|---|---|
| Unit Level | 2 |
| Credit Points | 6 |
| Student Contribution Band | SCA Band 2 |
| Fraction of Full-Time Student Load | 0.125 |
| Pre-requisites or Co-requisites |
Pre-requisite: COIT11226 Systems Analysis
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework). |
| Class Timetable | View Unit Timetable |
| Residential School | No Residential School |
Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2027
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Assessment Tasks
To see assessment details from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).
Past Exams
All University policies are available on the Policy web site, however you may wish to directly view the following policies below.
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of policies are available on the Policy web site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Source: Student Unit and Teaching Evaluation
There are too many slides in week 4 (risks).
Reduce the number of slides in Week 4 by consolidating key concepts.
The Week 4 risk management content was consolidated to focus on key concepts, and tutorial activities were aligned to reinforce them through discussion and application.
Source: Unit Coordinator's Reflection
Tutorials currently lack activities that introduce the hybrid methodology.
Include targeted activities in tutorials to support the introduction of the hybrid methodology.
Targeted tutorial activities were introduced to reinforce the integration of Agile and Waterfall methodologies.
Source: Unit Coordinator's reflection
Students experienced challenges in connecting with peers and forming project teams.
Provide structured online support for team formation to help students connect and form groups early in the term.
In Progress
Source: Unit Coordinator's reflection
The current oral presentation in Assessment 3 gives students an opportunity to communicate their understanding; however, it may not consistently verify individual knowledge across all assessed concepts.
Replace the oral presentation with an oral examination to enable more targeted questioning, verify individual understanding, and strengthen assessment authenticity.
In Progress
To see Learning Outcomes from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.