The purpose of the online quiz is to consolidate and challenge your knowledge of content covered in the first 4 weeks of the unit. This content focuses on the nature of feeding and swallowing conditions, clinical assessment of these conditions and bolus modification. The online quiz will include a range of question types, such as single choice, multiple choice, matching, short answer, true/false, etc. 

Level of GenAI use allowed:  

• Level 1: The assessment is completed entirely without artificial intelligence (AI) assistance in a controlled environment, ensuring that students rely solely on their existing knowledge, understanding, and skills. You must not use AI at any point during the assessment. You must demonstrate your core skills and knowledge.

There are no documents to submit for this assessment task. As this assessment involves a quiz, the 72-hour grace period does not apply to this assessment.

Quiz questions will include closed-type questions (e.g., multiple choice, matching etc.) and/or short answer questions. Points assigned are identified for each question. You will attain points for questions answered correctly.

This written assessment task is based on a case study of a child with swallowing and feeding needs. The case study will include a case history, assessment results, and other pertinent clinical and personal information. You are working as a speech pathologist in a community private practice setting. You will need to review all the information, analyse the assessment results, and complete the following three parts. Please note that the case study you have been allocated will be provided on Moodle in the Assessment Tile.

Part A

Write two long-term goals (LTG) and four short-term goals (STG) using the SMART goal format. All goals must address the pertinent aspects of the case information and assessment results, demonstrating a clear understanding of child and family needs, and consideration of the child’s swallowing and feeding needs that impact on safety, nutrition, hydration, and wellbeing. 

Part B

Choose two STGs from Part A and justify why your goals are appropriate for your allocated case study. Your justification should reference the case information, the assessment results, and evidence-based practice. 

Part B has a word limit of 800 words, including in-text references but excluding your reference list. Adherence to the word count is not included in the marking rubric however the marker will only read and assess content up to the stated word limit.

Part C

To address the two STGs that you did not choose in Part B, create one parent handout per STG (two parent handouts in total). The purpose of each handout is to provide an informative resource to the parent/caregiver to support their child in achieving the identified STG. Each parent handout must be at least one and no more than two A4 pages in length.

Careful consideration and planning should be given to the content included in each handout. The handouts should therefore:

• Clearly outline the intervention procedure addressing the STG (i.e., positioning, environment, equipment, diet modification, exercises, parent education).
• State how the procedure can be implemented by the parent/caregiver in the home environment.
• Be tailored to the specific needs of the case study whilst reflecting evidence-based practice.
• Use parent-friendly language and images.

Level of GenAI use allowed: 

• Level 2: Artificial intelligence (AI) may be used for pre-task activities such as brainstorming, outlining and initial research. This level focuses on the effective use of AI for planning, synthesis and ideation, but assessments should emphasise the ability to develop and refine these ideas independently. You may use AI for planning, idea development and research. Your final submission should show how you have developed and refined these ideas.

There are four (4) marking criteria that will be used to assess Assessment 2 for SPCH13010:

1. The first criterion focuses on your analysis and interpretation of case information to inform the development of appropriate and effective goals that align with evidence-based practice and client needs. This criterion is worth 20% of the case study grade.
2. The second criterion focuses on your clinical reasoning and justification of your chosen STGs, which connect the identified needs in the case information, assessment results, evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, and a holistic view of child and family needs. This criterion is worth 35% of the case study grade.
3. The third criterion focuses on your development of informative therapy resources that directly contribute to the achievement of the corresponding STG, integrate evidence-based practice, and are customised to the family’s needs. This criterion is worth 35% of the case study grade.
4. The fourth criterion focuses on the quality of your writing including your use of appropriate writing style and conventions and use of APA-7 referencing. This criterion is worth 10% of the case study grade.

Please see the CB87 Academic Integrity handout for information on paraphrasing, source quality, and artificial intelligence use across units in the speech pathology course. 

In this assessment, you will be required to complete an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) based on a clinical scenario of an adult with swallowing needs. This assessment task requires you to complete the OSCE in the role of a clinician. This OSCE includes preparatory time followed by two (2) stations. Each station of your OSCE is timed with the OSCE totaling 25 minutes. 

OSCE Preparation 

Your assigned assessment time will be provided to you on Moodle at least two weeks prior the OSCE. 

The case information will be released in Moodle 24 hours prior to your OSCE start time. The case will provide assessment results, and other clinical and personal information for an adult with swallowing needs. In preparation for the OSCE, you must analyse the provided information and use clinical reasoning to:

• Choose 1 (one) current evidence-based rehabilitative intervention to help improve the strength/coordination/speed of the individual’s swallowing function,
• Choose 1 (one) current evidence-based compensatory intervention to help improve the safety and/or efficiency of the individual’s current swallowing function,
• Choose 1 (one) alteration to food texture or liquid viscosity to help improve the safety and/or efficiency of the individual’s current swallowing function, and
• Create and print out a clinical record template that is maximum 2 (two) pages long, which you will use in Station 1 to document by hand all procedures implemented, and all outcomes achieved by the simulated individual.

STATION 1 (20 minutes)

Station 1 of the OSCE will be completed first. You will have 20 minutes to complete Station 1, including time to address the individual's questions and concerns. Ensure that you allocate sufficient time to respond to questions and concerns when you are planning prior to the OSCE. You do not need to use the full 20 minutes if you have effectively demonstrated all requirements in less time. You will be alerted when there are 5 minutes remaining. Station 1 will be stopped at the 20-minute mark, regardless of how far you have progressed with supporting your client's understanding and use of the selected intervention strategies. You will only be marked on performance demonstrated up until the 20-minute mark. 

In Station 1, you will meet with the simulated adult client (with swallowing needs) outlined in the case information provided earlier.

• Effectively explain and demonstrate your chosen rehabilitative intervention,
• Effectively explain and demonstrate your chosen compensatory intervention,
• Effectively explain the rationale for the food texture or liquid viscosity modification* and clearly and accurately address any questions or concerns raised by the individual, and
• Document the individual's performance on the clinical record form you developed and printed. You do not need to complete all documentation from the session in Station 1 as you will have additional time in Station 2 for this purpose. However, you will find it helpful to at least partially document the individual's performance as it happens in Station 1.

* You are not required to demonstrate or explain methods to alter diet textures (e.g., how to thicken liquids, how to test IDDSI levels). You are only required to explain the rationale for changing the texture/viscosity.

STATION 2 (5 minutes)

Station 2 of the OSCE will be completed immediately after Station 1 on campus. You will be required to use the clinical record form you developed to finish accurately and concisely documenting the procedures implemented and the outcomes achieved. You will be provided 5 minutes to finish filling in your clinical record form. You do not need to use the full 5 minutes if you have effectively documented all procedures and outcomes in less time. Station 2 of the OSCE will be stopped at the 5-minute mark, whether or not you have completed filling in your form. 

The only items you may bring into the OSCE room are:

• Any tools/materials/handouts** required to support your demonstration and/or explanations (NOTE: If you require an item from the storage room, you must book the item a minimum of one (1) day in advance by contacting the Unit Coordinator. Multiple items may be requested),
• The printed clinical record template you created (on which you will document the procedures and outcomes of the session), and
• A pen or pencil to document on the clinical record template.

The completed clinical record form and any handouts utilised during the OSCE must be handed in at the end of Station 2 of the OSCE. These forms part of the marking criteria for this assessment. Ensure all forms and handouts have your first and last names on them. 

**Handouts should not exceed two (2) back-to-back A4 pages of material. Excessive reliance on the handout to explain your chosen interventions will impact flow of your conversation and therefore impact marks, per the rubric.

You should aim to arrive 15 minutes prior to the official assessment commencement time. In the extraordinary circumstance you are late, you will be permitted late entry to your assessment of up to 5 minutes after the assessment commencement time. The period of lost time due to lateness will be deducted from your overall assessment time. If you are denied access to the assessment due to lateness (i.e., arriving beyond the permitted late entry period), you should submit an online application for a deferred assessment. If your application for deferred assessment is denied, you will receive a fail grade; however, you may be eligible for a supplementary assessment per CQU policy.

Level of GenAI (Generative Artificial Intelligence) use allowed: 

Level 2: 

• Artificial intelligence (AI) may be used for pre-task activities such as brainstorming, outlining and initial research. This level focuses on the effective use of AI for planning, synthesis and ideation, but assessments should emphasise the ability to develop and refine these ideas independently. You may use AI for planning, idea development and research. Your final submission should show how you have developed and refined these ideas.

There are no documents to submit for this assessment task. As this assessment involves an OSCE, the 72-hour grace period does not apply to this assessment.

There are marking four (4) criteria that will be used to assess Assessment 3 for SPCH13010:

1. The first criterion focuses on how well your choices of rehabilitative and compensatory interventions and food/fluid modification are supported in the evidence and how well they map to the individual’s needs. This criterion is worth 25% of the OSCE grade.
2. The second criterion focuses on the accuracy of the rehabilitation and intervention procedures you teach and the person-centredness of your explanations/instructions/demonstrations. This criterion is worth 30% of the OSCE grade.
3. The third criterion focuses on the person-centredness of your explanation of the food/liquid modification recommendation and how accurately and ethically you respond to the individual’s questions/concerns. This criterion is 30% of the OSCE grade.
4. The fourth criterion focuses on the clarity and organisation of the headings/sections in your clinical record template and the accuracy of the procedures and outcomes you documented within the template. This criterion is worth 15% of the OSCE grade. 

Please note that per section 5.50 in the Higher Education Assessment Policy, late penalties do not apply to this assessment task. If you do not attend or complete this assessment task at the specified date/time, you will receive a mark of zero. In the event that you are unable to attend or complete the assessment task for reasons outlined in the Higher Education Assessment Policy, you must submit an extension request through Moodle.