CQUniversity Unit Profile
PSYC13015 Research Methods 3
Research Methods 3
All details in this unit profile for PSYC13015 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

This unit is designed to equip you with the analytic skills necessary to carry out advanced applied research. You will develop a toolbox of practical skills that will allow you to undertake qualitative and quantitative research as part of your undergraduate and/or professional career/s in psychology, research, business, government, community development, education, and beyond. The unit builds on earlier research methods units in psychology (PSYC11012 and PSYC12048). You will be introduced to advanced statistical techniques, as well as how to analyse and interpret quantitative data using industry-standard statistical software packages. You will also continue to develop your skills in qualitative research methods and build your abilities in research interviewing, thematic analysis and reporting of qualitative data, how to build rapport and trust with participants, and how to be self-aware and reflexive when conducting qualitative research.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 7
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

PSYC11012 and PSYC12048.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2025

Adelaide
Bundaberg
Cairns
Online
Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Portfolio
Weighting: 50%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 30%
3. Practical Assessment
Weighting: 20%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from SUTE, peer review

Feedback

Students appreciated the passion and empathy showed by the lecturer who taught the quantitative modules, and enjoyed how they introduced humour into statistics teaching.

Recommendation

Teaching staff will continue to foster an engaging and empathic learning environment for students trying to master advanced research methods.

Feedback from SUTE, personal reflection.

Feedback

Some students wanted simpler and more accessible explanations for some topic areas.

Recommendation

Simplify, where possible, explanations of concepts and introduce other methods (e.g., step-by-step sheets) to improve student comprehension.

Feedback from SUTE, personal reflection.

Feedback

Update some of the quantitative teaching materials.

Recommendation

Replace on Moodle any data analysis examples drawn from an older textbook with those from the latest textbook.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Prepare quantitative data ready for analysis in a statistical software package.
  2. Analyse and report quantitative data in a professional format.
  3. Interpret and defend qualitative data analysis in a professional format.
  4. Prepare for and conduct a qualitative interview.

The external accrediting body is Australian Psychology Accreditation Council (APAC). The unit fulfills one of the key foundational competencies outlined in the accreditation document for students completing a 3 year psychology degree, i.e. they will acquire a depth of understanding of underlying principles, theories and concepts in the discipline, using a scientific approach to research methods and statistics. This is a compulsory (year 3) unit required to successfully complete the course.

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Portfolio - 50%
2 - Written Assessment - 30%
3 - Practical Assessment - 20%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

SPSS Statistics: A Practical Guide

5th Edition (2022)
Authors: Peter Allen, Kellie Bennett, Brody Heritage
CENGAGE
Australia
ISBN: 9780170460163
Binding: Paperback
Prescribed

Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners

1st Edition
Authors: Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke
Sage
ISBN: 9781847875822
Binding: Paperback
Supplementary

Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics

6th Edition (2024)
Authors: Andy Field
Sage
London London , UK
ISBN: 9781529630015
Binding: Paperback
Supplementary

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA)

7th Edition (2019)
Authors: American Psychological Association
American Psychological Association
Washington Washington , DC , USA
ISBN: 9781433832161
Binding: Paperback

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Internal/external webcam with microphone of sufficient quality for conducting an interview
  • SPSS version 29 or higher. STANDARD Grad pack. The cheapest BASE Grad pack does not have all the essential statistics.
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Darren Walker Unit Coordinator
d.j.walker@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 10 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

Introduction to Research Methods 3 and Interviewing A (introduction) 

Chapter

Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 1 (essential) 

Allen et al (2022) Chapters 1 & 2 (recommended) 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom online tutorial (90 mins duration max).

Week 2 Begin Date: 17 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

Interviewing B (doing)

Chapter

Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 2

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom online tutorial (90 mins duration max).

Week 3 Begin Date: 24 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

Interviewing C (reflecting)

 

Chapter

Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapter 4

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom online tutorial (90 mins duration max).

 

Week 4 Begin Date: 31 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

Revision ANOVA [one-way designs]

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapters 3 & 7

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration each).

 

Week 5 Begin Date: 07 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

Factorial ANOVA part 1 [Between subjects designs]

 

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapter 8

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshop (1hr duration each).

 

Vacation Week Begin Date: 14 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 6 Begin Date: 21 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

Factorial ANOVA part 2 [Mixed designs]

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapter 9

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration each).


SPSS ANALYSES Due: Week 6 Wednesday (23 Apr 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 7 Begin Date: 28 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

Advanced thematic analysis A

Chapter

Braun and Clarke (2013) Chapters 8 & 9

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom online tutorial (90 mins duration max).

Week 8 Begin Date: 05 May 2025

Module/Topic

Advanced thematic analysis B

Chapter

Braun and Clarke Chapters 10 & 11

Events and Submissions/Topic

Zoom online tutorial (90 mins duration max).

 

 

Week 9 Begin Date: 12 May 2025

Module/Topic

Multiple Regression Part 1 (correlation and simple linear regression)

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapters 12 & 13

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration each).

 

Week 10 Begin Date: 19 May 2025

Module/Topic

Multiple Regression Part 2 (multiple regression)

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapter 13

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshop (1hr duration each).


EXPERIENTIAL THEMATIC ANALYSIS Due: Week 10 Wednesday (21 May 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 11 Begin Date: 26 May 2025

Module/Topic

Bridge to honours statistics [ANCOVA]

Chapter

Allen et al (2022) Chapter 10

Events and Submissions/Topic

Live Lecture (90 mins duration max) and 2 x Zoom online SPSS workshops (1hr duration each).

Week 12 Begin Date: 02 Jun 2025

Module/Topic

Bringing it all together 

Chapter

Journal papers suggested. 

Events and Submissions/Topic

 

 

 

Component 2 of SPSS ANALYSES Due: Week 12 Friday (6th June  2025) 11:45 pm AEST.

 


INTERVIEW SKILLS Due: Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Review/Exam Week Begin Date: 09 Jun 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

 

 

Exam Week Begin Date: 16 Jun 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Tasks

1 Portfolio

Assessment Title
SPSS ANALYSES

Task Description

You will be given data sets for statistical tests covered in the unit. You will be required to enter the data into SPSS, analyse these data and write up the statistical program output in brief APA style. There will be three data sets which form your portfolio. However, you are required to submit each component of the portfolio at designated submission dates to scaffold your learning and enable you to benefit from feedback. The first component (one-way ANOVA) is due in the vacation week and is worth 15% of the unit marks. The second component (factorial ANOVA, multiple regression and ANCOVA) is due in Week 12 and is worth 35% of the unit marks. 

The use of Gen AI is permitted for all components of the portfolio. More detailed guidance will be given within tutorials and on Moodle. Note that we urge caution if using Gen AI and other software tools for this assessment. This is because Gen AI is unlikely to help with transferring raw data into SPSS. In addition, the writing style needed for presenting statistical findings in this assessment is not generic and requires the reporting of specific values in a particular way.

For this assessment, you may use Gen AI to help you:

  • Supplement teaching resources provided on the unit to help you further understand the concepts discussed (such as those related to how to undertake the type of statistical analysis described), as well as finding and understanding background literature and resources related to null hypothesis statistical probability testing. 
  • Check the grammar, punctuation, and syntax of your written work.
  • Enhance the vocabulary of your writing and submitted assessment.
  • Manage the word count of the assessment.
  • Find or create statistical symbols, or to help with graphical representation of data. 

You are not permitted to use Gen AI to:

  • 'Automatically' generate statistical output (i.e., without the use of the SPSS software package). 

If you use Gen AI you should reference it appropriately. For the portfolio this may not necessarily require an in-text citation but any use of Gen AI should be included in a reference list. For style requirements please see relevant documents produced by the ALC at CQUniversity (e.g., Guidelines for Referencing Large Language Models or Artificial Intelligence in Your Assignments) and chapter 10 (section 10) of the latest APA Publication Manual. As this is a rapidly evolving field, you are also advised to consult the online APA Style Blog (e.g., https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/).


Assessment Due Date

Week 6 Wednesday (23 Apr 2025) 11:45 pm AEST

Component 1 due in Week 6 and component 2 due in Week 12


Return Date to Students

Week 8 Wednesday (7 May 2025)

Component 1 will be returned to enable students to make use of feedback for component 2.


Weighting
50%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

Component 1. 

One-Way ANOVA. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis (1), assumption testing (3), correct interpretation of statistical output (4), effect size (3), and statistics written concisely in APA format (4). 15 marks awarded in total. WORD RANGE 250-400.

Component 2.

Factorial ANOVA. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis (2), assumption testing (4), correct interpretation of statistical output (6), effect size (3), and statistics written concisely in APA format (3). 18 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 300-500.

Multiple Regression. The % of marks awarded will be split among the following criteria: appropriate analysis (1), assumption testing (4), correct interpretation of statistical output (4), effect size (2), and statistics written concisely in APA format (2). 13 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 250-450.

ANCOVA. There will be two short answer questions. You will need to a) provide a logical rationale for implementing an ANCOVA; b) suggestions for an alternative analysis / design if the statistical assumptions for an ANCOVA are not met. 4 marks awarded. WORD RANGE 75-150. 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Each component needs to be submitted separately at the specified due date. Submissions must be in MS WORD file format ONLY.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Prepare quantitative data ready for analysis in a statistical software package.
  • Analyse and report quantitative data in a professional format.

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
EXPERIENTIAL THEMATIC ANALYSIS

Task Description

You will be given a transcript from a fictitious interview on the topic of student mental health. You will undertake Experiential Thematic Analysis upon the transcript. This will involve the following steps: 1) familiarise yourself fully with the transcript, 2) code the transcript and find a pattern in your coding that can be presented in the form of one overarching theme, two themes and three sub-themes, 3) You will present these types of themes in a graphical figure along with a written description of the relationship between the different types of themes you have identified, 4) you will provide a written explanation of the overarching theme, one theme and one sub-theme using a balance of analytic commentary and appropriately cited data extracts. Your written submission will show steps 3-4 (steps 1 and 2 are not submitted).

The use of Gen AI is permitted for some aspects of the assignment but not for other aspects (see below). More detailed guidance will be given within the assessment support materials provided during tutorials and via Moodle. Note, the reason you may not use AI to generate themes from the transcript is that it is antithetical to the type of qualitative analysis that you will be using - you will be expected to use your own subjectivity to inform your analysis. Moreover, if you use AI, your subjectivity is excluded and there is a very real risk your analysis can go very wrong and can feel synthetic.

For this assessment, you may use Gen AI to help you:

  • Supplement teaching resources provided on the unit to help you further understand the concepts discussed (such as those related to how to undertake the type of thematic analysis described by Braun and Clarke) as well as finding and understanding background literature and resources related to big Q qualitative analysis.
  • Check the grammar, punctuation, and syntax of your written work.
  • Enhance the vocabulary of your writing and submitted assessment.
  • Manage the word count of the assessment.
  • Find or create individual images or symbols that you use in your overall visualisation / graphical representation.

You are not permitted to use Gen AI to:

  • Help you identify codes or themes when undertaking your analysis.
  • Generating summaries of the interview or extracting examples from the transcript to illustrate your chosen themes.
  • Generate your overall final visualisation / graphical representation of your analysis. 

If you use Gen AI you should reference it appropriately. For the thematic analysis this may not necessarily require an in-text citation but any use of Gen AI should be included in a reference list. For style requirements please see relevant documents produced by the ALC at CQUniversity (e.g., Guidelines for Referencing Large Language Models or Artificial Intelligence in Your Assignments) and chapter 10 (section 10) of the latest APA Publication Manual. As this is a rapidly evolving field, you are also advised to consult the online APA Style Blog (e.g., https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/).


Assessment Due Date

Week 10 Wednesday (21 May 2025) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025)

The feedback from experimental thematic analysis will not impact the interview assessment.


Weighting
30%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

You will be assessed on your evidence of having undertaken a systematic and thorough process of qualitative data analysis that results in a convincing and compelling interpretation of the data. This will be assessed using the following four criteria: 1) balancing analytic commentary against data extracts (citing direct quotes from the transcript) in a professional format, 2) constructing an analytic commentary that provides original and novel insights into the meaning of the data, 3) capturing both overt and latent levels of meaning, 4) defending against alternative plausible interpretations of the data.

WORD LIMIT: Your submission must be no more than 800 words (inclusive of data extracts, data citations, text used in figures and headings). Any words over that limit will not be read or assessed by your marker. See the Psychology Word Count Information document for a rationale for this type of word limit restriction.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submissions must be in a MS WORD file format ONLY

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Interpret and defend qualitative data analysis in a professional format.

3 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title
INTERVIEW SKILLS

Task Description

You will conduct and record an individual interview with a classmate using Zoom software. Your tutor will allocate you to a group and you will then be responsible for arranging an interview with a classmate from that group. You will be provided with a research topic and a research question and you will be responsible for formulating your interview questions. The interview should be no shorter than 20 minutes and no longer than 40 minutes. You will need to schedule the interview to take place during teaching week 6. You will be responsible for scheduling the interviewing, arranging the Zoom meeting and for recording the meeting. You are advised to record the interview locally rather than to the cloud. You will submit a short, edited version of your interview for assessment. Your edited video should be no longer than 3 minutes. This will require you to select the parts of the interview that you believe show your best interviewing skills. You will be provided with basic instruction on how to edit a video using a MS Windows based app. 

Following the interview, you will produce a written reflection on your performance in the interview.

Your reflection could include one or more of the following points:

- Your introduction (did it set the person at ease by giving them a clear easy to understand overview of what you would be doing together?)

- The wording of your questions (were they open, non-leading, short and clear, empathetic?)

- Your listening skills (How was your posture, gaze and attention? What distracted you from listening well? What helped you to listen effectively? How well did you include active listening responses?)

- Your responsive skills (How well were you able to adapt your language/questions/structure to the participant’s account? What helped/hindered this?)

- What skills did you use to help elicit a rich, detailed account in the participant’s own words?

The use of Gen AI is permitted for some aspects of the assignment but not for other aspects (see below). More detailed guidance will be given within the assessment support materials provided during tutorials and via Moodle. Note, the reason you may not use AI to edit your video is because the way you edit your video reflects your understanding of what content is important and what content is unimportant in relation to the marking rubric and learning outcomes. Moreover, the reason you may not use AI to manipulate such things as eye contact, is that this is unlikely to be successful (such software requires a computer with a high-end graphics card and powerful processing capabilities and high-end video cameras) but also because it will likely make you appear synthetic. More generally, AI software could mask the interviewing behaviour we are assessing you on and will impair your ability to focus on developing the skills that will enable you to meet our unit’s learning outcomes for this assessment. 

For this assessment, you may use Gen AI to help you:

  • Supplement teaching resources provided on the unit to help you further understand the concepts discussed (such as those related to undertaking big Q qualitative research in general and how to undertake a naturalistic interview that avoids using fully structured interview schedules). 
  • Check the grammar, punctuation, and syntax of your written component.
  • Enhance the vocabulary of your written component.
  • Manage the word count of the assessment.
  • Improve the resolution or sound quality of your video (such as noise reduction or noise cancelling software).

You are not permitted to use Gen AI to:

  • Change any aspect of your physical appearance (particularly your eye movement) or your nonverbal behaviour (such as your facial expression and body movements).
  • Change your spoken communication (including speech and paralinguistic interjections).
  • Edit your video in terms of determining the placement of your edit points / cuts.
     

If you use Gen AI you should reference it appropriately. For the interview this may not necessarily require an in-text citation but any use of Gen AI should be included in a reference list. For style requirements please see relevant documents produced by the ALC at CQUniversity (e.g., Guidelines for Referencing Large Language Models or Artificial Intelligence in Your Assignments) and chapter 10 (section 10) of the latest APA Publication Manual. As this is a rapidly evolving field, you are also advised to consult the online APA Style Blog (e.g., https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/).


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 11:45 pm AEST

The interview assessment does not rely on specific content from the experiential thematic analysis assessment.


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Wednesday (18 June 2025)


Weighting
20%

Minimum mark or grade
50%

Assessment Criteria

You will be assessed against four criteria. The first three will relate to your performance in the interview as presented in your edited video recording. The fourth criteria will relate to your written reflection on the interview.

The three key criteria against which your interview recording will be assessed are: clarity of your recording, encouragement, and flexibility and listening. These criteria are designed to assess your ability to record an interview with sufficient fidelity to ensure it can be efficiently transcribed (you will not be required to transcribe your interview). The encouragement criteria will assess your ability to communicate respect and interest in your interviewee. Flexibility and listening will assess your ability to be responsive to your interviewee in relation to what questions you ask and how you ask those questions.

The fourth criteria against which your written reflection will be assessed is insightful and balanced reflection. This criteria is designed to asses your ability to both envision how you might further improve you interviewing skills and your reflections on the challenges posed by working in a qualitative research paradigm.

WORD LIMIT: Your written reflection must be no more than 300 words. Any words over that limit will not be read or assessed by your marker. See the Psychology Word Count Information document for a rationale for this type of word limit restriction. Similarly, your edited interview recording should be no longer than 3 minutes and if you submit a longer video, only the first 3 minutes will be viewed.

INTERVIEW RECORDING FORMAT: You should record in mp4 video format (the default recording format for Zoom) and render your video, after you have edited it. Then save it as an mp4 video file. That video file should have a resolution of either 720p (standard definition) or 1080p (high definition), have a bitrate no higher than 5mbps and a frame rate no higher than 30fps. Do not record in a higher resolution, higher bitrate or higher frame rate and do not render your video in a file format other than mp4. If you do so, your video file may be too large to upload to the submission page in Moodle or may not be viewable by your marker and you would be required to resubmit your assignment. It is also important that the dialogue is clear and of sufficient volume for the marker. You should check the quality of your webcam and/or external microphone. Teaching resources on Moodle will provide you with guidance on all of these technical aspects of recording and rendering your video


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Remember to submit both an edited video (.mp4) and a written reflection (MS WORD format only)

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Prepare for and conduct a qualitative interview.

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?