CQUniversity Unit Profile
OCCT13001 Enabling Work Participation
Enabling Work Participation
All details in this unit profile for OCCT13001 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In this unit, you will explore the role of occupational therapy in assisting clients to engage in work, considering historical perspectives as well as contemporary legislative and professional frameworks that guide practice. Building on your emerging task analysis skills, you will identify enablers and barriers to work participation, for use in creating appropriate client-centred goals. You will engage in simulations using occupational therapy tools to evaluate work environments and clients’ functional capacity for work. Learning activities provide you with the opportunity to develop case management and return to work plans for clients with a range of physical and psychosocial conditions.

Details

Career Level: Undergraduate
Unit Level: Level 3
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 8
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

The following unit is an essential co-requisite:OCCT13007 Successful completion of the following units as essential pre-requisites:OCCT12002OCCT12004OCCT12006BMSC12007HLTH12028

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 1 - 2025

Bundaberg
Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Presentation
Weighting: 25%
2. Written Assessment
Weighting: 35%
3. Case Study
Weighting: 40%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from SUTE comments, informal student comments and unit coordinator reflection.

Feedback

Student feedback indicated some challenges with understanding the requirements of the assessment tasks, in particular assessment task 3.

Recommendation

It is recommended that the assessment tasks be reviewed for clarity, and this is reflected on Moodle and assessment task sheets.

Feedback from SUTE comments, informal student comments and unit coordinator reflection.

Feedback

Students found the "real world" experience of the teaching staff beneficial to their learning.

Recommendation

It is recommended to continue to include educators with current clinical experience on the teaching team to offer "real world" examples for students.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Describe occupational therapy roles for enabling work participation
  2. Use selected occupational therapy assessment tools to identify barriers to work participation
  3. Synthesise information from clients and stakeholders to set appropriate work participation goals
  4. Develop work-based interventions using contemporary evidence and clearly communicated professional reasoning
  5. Integrate principles from the legislation and occupational justice when planning inclusive occupational therapy interventions that promote work participation.

OCCT13001 learning outcomes link directly to the following professional standards from the Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (2018):

  1. Professionalism: Standards 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10, 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, 1.17
  2. Knowledge and Learning: Standards 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 2.8
  3. Occupational Therapy Process and Practice: Standards 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.7, 3.8
  4. Communication: Standards 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 4.10, 4.11

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Presentation - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 35%
3 - Case Study - 40%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Communication
2 - Problem Solving
3 - Critical Thinking
4 - Information Literacy
5 - Team Work
6 - Information Technology Competence
7 - Cross Cultural Competence
8 - Ethical practice
9 - Social Innovation
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 - Presentation - 25%
2 - Written Assessment - 35%
3 - Case Study - 40%
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

Prescribed

Work : Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy.

Edition: 1st (2012)
Authors: Braveman, B., & Page, J.
F.A. Davis
Philadelphia Philadelphia , PA , USA
ISBN: 9780803600164. 9780803629950.

This text is available as an e-book through the library and does not need to be purchased. It is strongly recommended that you download and save the essential readings prior to class so you are not disadvantaged by concurrent user limits to the e-book.

Binding: eBook

This text is available as an e-book through the library and does not need to be purchased. It is strongly recommended that you download and save the essential readings prior to class so you are not disadvantaged by concurrent user limits to the e-book.

Additional Textbook Information

The prescribed text is still only available as a first edition book and has not been updated since originally published. However, it remains the most comprehensive and relevant single source for work enabling practice in occupational therapy.  More recent sources have been included in the e-reading list where appropriate to provide additional learning resources with contemporary evidence. 

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Microsoft office or similar word processing, spreadsheeting and presentation software
  • PowerPoint
  • Microsoft CoPilot Generative Artificial Intelligence tool.
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Narelle Henwood Unit Coordinator
n.henwood@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Legislation and models for practice Begin Date: 10 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

  • A history of work enablement in occupational therapy
  • Legislation important to consider
  • Occupational therapy and other models for practice
  • Occupational injustice
  • A hierarchy for return to work

Chapter

a) Braveman, B., & Page, J.J. (2012). Work: Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy. F.A. Davis


b) Boyt Schell, B. & Gillen, G. (2018). Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy. (13th ed.). Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.


c) Whiteford, G. E., Parnell, T., Ramsden, L., Nott, M., & Vine-Daher, S. (2022). Understanding and advancing occupational justice and social inclusion. In P. Liamputtong
(Ed.), Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences (pp. 181–210). Springer International Publishing


d) WHS Act 2011, p. 26

Events and Submissions/Topic

  • Ensure your group has made a topic choice in Moodle for Assessment 1.

 

 

Class Preparation:

  • You will be allocated specific pages of the Week 2 C and D readings to summarise and briefly present to your peers in the Week 2 class.
Week 2 Common conditions Begin Date: 17 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

•Soft tissue injuries (STI)
•Chronic pain and recovery mechanisms
•Types of common MSK injuries
•Tools for measuring pain levels

Chapter

a) Boyt Schell, B. & Gillen, G. (2019). Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy. (13th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.


b) Curtin, M., Egan, M. & Adams, J. (2017).Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment (7th ed.). Elsevier.

  • Reasoning underpinning assessments for people experiencing musculoskeletal conditions pp. 273-278.

 c) Evicore Healthcare (2019). Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of physical and occupational therapy services. (v.1.0.2019). American Medical Association.


d) Se Won Lee, M. (2017). Musculoskeletal Injuries and Conditions : Assessment and Management. Demos Medical.

 

Events and Submissions/Topic

  • Wear singlet top, closed in joggers and pants to Tutorial this week- suitable for physical activity.

 

Class Preparation:

  • In Week 1, you will be allocated specific pages of the Week 2 C and D readings to summarise and briefly present to your peers in the Week 2 class.
Week 3 Evaluating workers and their job Begin Date: 24 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

• The purpose of evaluating the worker
• Job Demands and Job Analysis
• Functional Capacity Evaluation
• Functional Capacity Assessment (NDIS)

Chapter

a) Braveman, B., & Page, J.J. (2012). Work: Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy. F.A. Davis


b) Curtin, M., Egan, M. & Adams, J. (2017) Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment. (7th ed.). Elsevier.

  • Chapter 15, Dynamic Performance Analysis pp. 207-215

c) Boyt Schell, B. & Gillen, G. (2019). Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy. (13th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.


d) Gooding, P., & West, A. (2023). Disability assessments and the algorithmic veil: lessons from the abandoned ‘independent assessments’ proposal for the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 29(1), 44–64.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Wear singlet top, closed in joggers and pants to class this week- suitable for performing functional capacity and manual handling tasks.

Week 4 In class presentations Begin Date: 31 Mar 2025

Module/Topic

  • Student group presentations in class.
  • See the Presentation Schedule in Moodle.

 

 

Chapter

No prescribed readings this week.

Presentation Tips:

Events and Submissions/Topic

Post your Annotated Bibliography handout to the Moodle forum​.


Roles and Legislation presentation Due: Week 4 Wednesday (2 Apr 2025) 8:00 am AEST
Week 5 Workplace Evaluation Begin Date: 07 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

  • Processes and purposes of workplace evaluation
  • Job Analysis practice

Chapter

a) Boyt Schell, B. & Gillen, G. (2019). Willard & Spackman's Occupational Therapy. (13th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.


b) Braveman, B., & Page, J.J. (2012). Work: Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy. F.A. Davis


c) Corlett, & McAtamney, L. (2019). RULA - Rapid Upper Limb Assessment. Osmond Ergonomics.


d) Hedge, A. (2000). REBA Employee Assessment Worksheet. ErgoPlus.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Simulated Workplace Evaluation.

  • A pre-briefing will occur during the Workshop before the on-campus visits.
  • The locations to meet DFM staff are to be advised for each campus.
  • Wear your student uniform, closed in shoes, sun protection and a high vis vest.
  • Please take a clipboard, pen, blank paper and your own printed copy of the Job Analysis template.
  • We will reconvene in the classroom after the Workplace Evaluation.
     
Week 6 Return to Work plans Begin Date: 21 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

  • Choosing appropriate Suitable Duties to faciliate client work resumption
  • Case example of grading job tasks to tailor a RTW plan that matches client functional limitations
  • Grading of work tasks for the Suitable Duties Plan

Chapter

a)  Commonwealth of Australia. (2019). National Return to Work Strategy 2020‑2030. Safe Work Australia. 


b) James, C., Southgate, E., Kable, A., Rivett, D. A., Guest, M., & Bohatko-Naismith, J. (2014). Return-to-work coordinators’ resourcefulness and the provision of suitable duties for nurses with injuries. Work, 48(4), 557–566


 c) Abedi, M., Aplin, T., Gane, E., & Johnston, V. (2024). "No Man’s Land”: the experiences of persons injured in a road traffic crash wanting to return to work in Queensland, Australia., Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(1), 48–57.


d) Desiron, H., de Rijk, A., Van Hoof, E., & Donceel, P. (2011). Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 615–628.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Applying ergonomics to work settings Begin Date: 28 Apr 2025

Module/Topic

•Ergonomics and anthropometrics

•Body mechanics and leverage principles

•Best practice for workstation assessment and set up

•Common equipment for office workstations

•Practice evaluating and adjusting a simulated client's office workstation

 

Chapter

a) Braveman, B., & Page, J.J. (2012). Work: Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy. F.A. Davis


b) Saha, A. K., Jahin, M. A., Rafiquzzaman, M., & Mridha, M. F. (2024). Ergonomic design of computer laboratory furniture: Mismatch analysis utilizing anthropometric data of university students. Heliyon, 10(14), e34063-.


c)  Ergonomic guide to computer based workstations


d) Setting up your workstation


e) CQUniversity Workstation Checklist (available on Moodle)

Events and Submissions/Topic

Simulated Office Workstation Evaluation.
•  Small groups will visit an on-campus staff member to evaluate their office workstation using the CQUniversity Workstation Checklist.

 

Assessment 3.
Choose your case scenario in Moodle for Assessment 3, FCA report.

 
Week 8 Mental health and work Begin Date: 05 May 2025

Module/Topic

•Negative assumptions at workplaces about mental health

•Stigma about mental health at workplaces

•Occupational therapy interventions for Depression/Anxiety​ at work: 

•Definitions of stress

•Symptoms of PTSD

•Chronic stressors

 

Chapter

a) Braveman, B., & Page, J.J. (2012). Work: Promoting Participation and Productivity Through Occupational Therapy. F.A. Davis


b) Parkinson, S., & Brooks, R. (2020). Occupational therapy in an independent vocational service- an example occupational formulation with measurable goals. in S. Parkinson, & R. Brooks. (2020). A guide to the formulation of plans and goals in occupational therapy. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 169-173


c) Glattacker, M. , Heyduck, K. & Jakob, T.  (2018).  Yellow flags as predictors of rehabilitation outcome in chronic low back pain.  Rehabilitation Psychology,  63  (3),  408-417.


d) Edgelow, M., Harrison, L., Miceli, M., & Cramm, H. (2020). Occupational therapy return to work interventions for persons with trauma and stress-related mental health conditions: A scoping review. Work, 65(4), 821–836.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Suitable Duties Plan Due: Week 8 Wednesday (7 May 2025) 11:55 pm AEST
Week 9 Writing effective FCA reports Begin Date: 12 May 2025

Module/Topic

  • Introducing Formal Evaluation tools commonly used for FCA
  • Interpreting evaluation tool results for FCA
  • Documenting objective observations
  • Revisiting occupation based goal writing
  • Ethical use of GenAI tools

Chapter

a) Üstün, T.B., Kostanjsek,, N., Chatterji, S., & Rehm, j. (2012), Measuring Health and Disability. Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. World Health Organisation.


b) Farmer, C., Adedipe, D., Bal, V. H., Chlebowski, C., & Thurm, A. (2020). Concordance of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, second and third editions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 64(1), 18–26.


c) Gateley, C. A. (2023). Documentation manual for occupational therapy  (5th edition). SLACK Incorporated.

  • Words for work occupations pp. 60, 65
  • Organising objective info pp. 103-109
  • Using COAST pp. 71, 73-78
  • Example work goals pp. 81-82

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 10 First Nations lived experiences of work Begin Date: 19 May 2025

Module/Topic

•"Closing the Gap" policies

•Authentic voices of Indigenous and First Nation peoples discussing work

•"Yarnsafe" principles

•Actively participate in a yarning circle to share understanding and stories about work and racism

Chapter

a) Biddle, N., Hunter, B., Yap, M., & Gray, M. (2016). Eight ways we can improve Indigenous employment. 


b) Steel, L., & Heritage, B. (2020). Inter-cultural contexts: Exploring the experience of indigenous employees in mainstream Australian organisations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 72(3), 248–256.


c) headspace (2020). Clinical Tips: Working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young People.


d)  Burke, A. W., Welch, S., Power, T., Lucas, C., & Moles, R. J. (2022). Clinical yarning with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples—a systematic scoping review of its use and impacts. Systematic Reviews, 11(1), 129–15.

Events and Submissions/Topic

Yarning circle with First Nations Guest speaker to be confirmed. This experience may alternatively involve viewing a recording of past students engaging in a yarning circle.

Week 11 Medicolegal report writing Begin Date: 26 May 2025

Module/Topic

  • Differences between assumed facts, facts and opinion
  • Medicolegal language for report writing and common pitfalls
  • Roles of expert witnesses

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 12 Begin Date: 02 Jun 2025

Module/Topic

  • Post your FCA report Case Study questions to the Moodle forum.

Chapter

No prescribed Readings this week.

Events and Submissions/Topic

No class this week.

9am-10am Teaching staff will hold an optional drop in Q & A session for your FCA report. You may attend this in person at either campus in our regular classroom or via Zoom.


Functional Capacity Assessment Report Due: Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 11:55 pm AEST
Term Specific Information

Prescribed text: The library has been able to supply the prescribed text Braveman & Page (2012) as an EBook. There is a concurrent limit of 6 users on this resource. You are strongly advised to download the relevant pages (you are permitted to save or print up to 100 pages) of the eBook prior to class so you can access them easily for in-class learning activities.

 

Updated e-Readings: All 2025 e-Readings for OCCT13001 have been reviewed and updated especially for full text relevant recent sources easily accessible through the CQUniversity Library. Some older eReadings have been retained because alternative sources were not available. Not all e-Readings have unlimited user access. You are strongly advised to download the relevant pages prior to class so you can access them easily for in-class learning activities.

 

Campus support: This year it is planned to have on campus teaching support at both Rockhamption and Bundaberg.

 

Inherent requirements: You should be familiar with the CB84 Inherent Requirements listed in the "Getting Started" tab of the Handbook. These are essential capabilities, knowledge, behaviours and skills that are needed to complete this unit, especially as it contains several simulation experiences. While you are a health professional in training who is learning new knowledge and skills, there are required personal qualities that underpin your practice. These are assessed in OCCT13001 Learning Outcomes 3 and 4. You should be able to demonstrate Ethical Behaviour, Behavioural Stability, Communication Skills, Relational Skills, Reflective Skills, and Interpersonal Engagement in class, when communicating with staff and peers and for OCCT13001 simulation experiences.

 

WIL Hours:  There are 14 hours of WIL embedded within this unit. WIL hours are achievable via a range of simulated clinical learning experiences:

  • attendance at two planned on-campus worksite visits listed in the class schedule for Week 5 and Week 7 (up to 2 hours for each visit)
  • completing your A2 Suitable Duties Plan and the A3 FCA report (up to 10 hours in total)

Prioritise attendance at all in-class opportunities.  Teaching staff from OCCT13001 will not monitor or sign-off your WIL hours or attendance.  It is your responsibility to keep honest and accurate records in the CB84 Professional Occupational Therapy Practice Moodle WIL hours wiki.

 

Student workload: As for all 6 credit point units, you are expected to devote up to 150 hours of study to this unit. Assessment tasks and weekly readings have been revised in 2025 to ensure your study committment fits within this timeframe. The timing of unit assessment tasks has been designed to reduce the burden of lengthy end of term assignments, particularly the due dates for your A2 Suitable Duties Plan and the A3 FCA report. Where possible, teaching staff have aimed to schedule different assessment due dates for core CB84 units by collaborating with your other unit co-ordinators for the term.

 

Assessment file version submissions: It is your responsibility to check you upload the correct and most up to date version of your files for marking. If you submit the wrong file/s to Moodle or omit a required item and advise staff, late penalties may be applied up to the date and time of your notification. If you submit the wrong file/s and do not notify staff, the file/s submitted to Moodle will be marked. In particular, if your Presentation handout is not uploaded to the Moodle Forum for sharing prior to the due date, your handout may not receive any marks for the associated marking criterion.

 

Late penalties for submission: HMAS do not currently support automatic 3 day assessment extensions on trial in other parts of the university. The A2 Suitable Duties Plan and the A3 FCA report submissions will therefore attract late penalties for every 24 hour period or part thereof that the submission is overdue past the due date. Late penalties are calculated as 5% of the total assignment value per 24 hour period. For example, a Suitable Duties Plan submission (total of 35 marks available) that is 3 days late will attract a penalty of 3 X 1.75 marks= 5.25/35 marks. In contrast, an FCA report submission (total of 40 marks available) that is 4 days late will attract a penalty of 4 X 2 marks= 8/40 marks.  Accumulated late penalties can quickly add up to a significant portion of marks available and increase your risk of failing the assessment task. To avoid late penalties, students require an approved extension that is registered in the offical university Assessment Extension System and showing in Moodle gradebook. 

Assessment Tasks

1 Presentation

Assessment Title
Roles and Legislation presentation

Task Description

Overview and Purpose:

In a small group, you will prepare and deliver a professional presentation about legislation influencing occupational therapy and multidisciplinary team roles in work enablement. You will apply principles from legislation and occupational justice pertinent to selected contexts for enabling work participation practice as an occupational therapist. You will also gain knowledge from engaging with peer presentations. It is expected you will demonstrate effective and professional presentation skills, building on the skills you have already used in Year 1 & 2.

This assessment reflects common oral presentation formats for many professional conferences, in-service and training opportunities and contains the following parts:

Group Part A:

A 15-minute oral presentation using PowerPoint for a specific legislative and population context. You are provided with choices for the legislation and population context in Moodle to use for your group presentation. You will design a specific case scenario and apply an occupational therapy practice model to help you contextualise your explanations for the work enabling roles of the occupational therapist and team. You will use appropriate evidence to prepare the content of your presentation. As part of the professional presentation format, your group will facilitate a class discussion time for your student peers at the end of your oral presentation.

Individual Part B:

An individually prepared Annotated Bibliography of two key sources that you will provide to your peers as a handout in digital form. A verbal explanation of one source per student from your handout. Your personal professional verbal and nonverbal communication will be evaluated during the presentation.

Preparation for your Assessment task:

  • You will be allocated to a group before term starts.
  • Your group will complete a Moodle Choice activity listing the campus-based topic options for the population context and legislation that you will discuss in your presentation.
  • Groups will select and save one Moodle Choice topic for your campus of enrolment, then that choice will be unavailable to other groups.
  • In your group, you will independently explore professional literature and relevant legislation to identify factors that influence practice as an occupational therapist in your chosen legislative and population context.
  • You will use professionally prepared PowerPoint slides to support your oral presentation and class discussion time.
  • Before the due date, you will post in the OCCT13001 Moodle forum to share your individually prepared Annotated Bibliography with your peers.
  • You will submit your group PowerPoint slides, Presentation Script and individual Annotated Bibliography to Moodle for marking before the due date.

Filenames for Submission

Each group must submit one completed CB84 assignment coversheet, one copy of the PowerPoint, one copy of the Presentation Script and all individual student Annotated Bibliographies to Moodle. Name your Moodle file submissions as follows to expedite marking:

  • Assignment Coversheet: Campusgroupnumber_CS e.g. BDG1_CS
  • Annotated Bibliography: FirstnameLastname_AB e.g. SueJones_AB
  • PowerPoint slides: Campusgroupnumber_PP e.g. BDG1_PP
  • Presentation script: Campusgroupnumber_PS e.g. BDG1_PS

Schedule of Presentation Topics:

The schedule for the presentation order is fixed by your group choice of legislative and population context. For example, the Bundaberg group that selects Moodle Choice 3 will present 3rd and so on. The draft and final Presentation Schedule will be available on Moodle.

Group Part A: Oral Presentation Content

1. For your setting, create a case scenario client history to contextualise your presentation. Choose a practice model to explain the role of occupational therapy for the client context. Give a brief overview of multidisciplinary team member roles: (suggest 4-6 slides)
  • Develop a case scenario history for a client within the legislative and population context chosen. An ideal case scenario will be realistic for the population context, with clearly identified client occupational needs and consistently linked to work enabling principles and interventions discussed throughout the presentation.
  • Examine evidence from professional literature and current Australian occupational therapy practitioners to clearly outline the role of the occupational therapist in your allocated area of work enabling practice. Give examples of the expected work enabling duties for an occupational therapist helping your case scenario client.
  • Select an appropriate occupational therapy practice model (CMOP-E, MOHO, KAWA, or PEO) and use it to support occupational therapy evaluation and interventions for your case scenario client. Explain who would pay for occupational therapy interventions in this context.
  • List other professionals who would potentially be part of the multidisciplinary team working with the client. Provide a brief description of the contribution of other key professionals in the team to the process of enabling the client’s work participation.
  • Use in-text citations on your slides to provide appropriate professional evidence to support your explanations.
2. Explain how principles from the legislation can help reduce occupational injustices relevant to work participation with your case scenario client: (suggest 3-4 slides)
  • Select three of the six occupational injustices outlined in Whiteford, G. E., Parnell, T., Ramsden, L., Nott, M., & Vine-Daher, S. (2022). Understanding and Advancing Occupational Justice and Social Inclusion. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences (pp. 181–210). Springer International Publishing. 
  • Explain how at least 3 principles from your allocated legislation reduces your three chosen occupational injustices to support work participation for your case scenario client.
  • Use intext citations on your slides as professional evidence to justify your explanations
3. Engage your audience.
  • Use multimedia to enhance the appearance of your slides, referencing image sources appropriately. Slides should be visually appealing and easy to follow. Deliver within the time limits set (minimum 12-maximum 17 minutes) for the 15-minute presentation and maximum 5 minutes’ question time.
4. Facilitate a Class Discussion: (suggest 1-3 slides)
  • Develop 2 open-ended questions to ask your audience to facilitate peer engagement in the 5-minute class discussion time after your presentation.
  • Ensure your questions are easily able to be answered by your peers in relation to what you have already presented. (Suggest 1-3 slides)
  • Make sure your discussion time is inclusive by actively asking for responses from students at both Rockhampton and Bundaberg locations.
  • Do not prepare any new information to present during the class discussion time.
  • NB: Any student with an approved extension who is not able to present in class on the scheduled day cannot facilitate a class discussion time and will be set an alternative task as part of the presentation assessment.
5. Format references and bibliography sources: (not directly marked)
  • Provide in-text style APA 7 citations on each relevant slide for all References and Annotated Bibliography sources.
  • Use APA 7 style to provide the full reference list for all your cited sources as the last slide/s of your PowerPoint presentation, including your Legislative Act.

 

Individual Part B: Annotated Bibliography Content

6. Share key resources: (suggest one page handout and 1-2 slides for 1 key source)
i) Provide peers with an Annotated Bibliography class handout
  • You will individually select two key professional literature sources to annotate as a class handout for your peers to accompany your presentation. 

  • Use the CQU library guide "Academic Writing for Annotated Bibliographies" to help you prepare your handout. It is suggested you use a Word document for your handout.  In your Annotated Bibliography, present detail about the Coverage and Relevance of each source (around 200 words). You DO NOT need to provide information about the Currency, Authority and Objectivity of each source. Use APA 7 style to list the full reference for each source in your handout.

  • Provide the handout as a digital resource for your peers via the OCCT13001 Moodle forum before your presentation. It is expected that group members will select different sources to include in the Annotated Bibliography so that your peers will be provided with a broad range of key sources about the legislative and population context.
  • The Annotated Bibliography will NOT include your allocated Legislative Act.
  • If you do not share your Annotated Bibliography handout in the Moodle Forum for your peers, time stamped before the due date on the presentation day, you will not obtain any marks for this component.

ii) Oral presentation of one key Annotated source
  • Each group member will orally present one key professional literature source (not a website) from your individual Annotated Bibliography of 2 sources. Provide an oral explanation of the source’s
    • Coverage: explain the main points, argument, and level of content
    • Relevance: why you found the key source useful in your topic preparation, new information you learned and how it shaped your presentation and/or your case scenario.
  • Provide an in-text style APA 7 citation on the slide when you discuss your key Annotated Bibliography source. You will provide the full citation in your presentation reference list and handout.
  • Include succinct key points on your slide that outlines the main aim, content, or recommendations of the source. It is NOT recommended to copy and paste your whole 200 word annotation on your slide.
  • Deliver your presentation using professional verbal and non-verbal communication. You will be individually marked on all of your oral delivery including your one key professional literature source.
Tips for preparing your content:

See the Task instruction document on Moodle for tips on designing your slides and facilitating the class discussion.

Use of GenAI for this task:

You may use editing and citation tools such as Grammarly and Perplexity to assist you to improve your work. NO use of Generative Artifical Intelligence (GenAI similar to but not limited to CoPilot, Chat GPT etc.) is permitted for this assessment. Explain your ethical use of tools in the CB84 Assignment Coversheet to avoid Academic Misconduct reporting.

Word count:

Research has found that on average we can clearly present up to 150 spoken words per minute of presentation time, less if there are a lot of complex words of more than three syllables.

  • Your group's prepared Presentation Script, including individual annotations, should therefore be approximately 2250-2500 words.
  • Ensure that you orally present your information as concisely as possible while covering all key elements required. Allocate your time wisely according to the marks available for each element.
  • It is suggested that presentation of each key professional literature source should take a maximum of 2 minutes or it will not fit into the total group presentation time available.


Assessment Due Date

Week 4 Wednesday (2 Apr 2025) 8:00 am AEST

Submit a group Coversheet, PowerPoint Slides and Presentation Script, and all individual student Annotated Bibliography handouts to Moodle. Upload your individual Annotated Bibliography handout to the Moodle forum to share with peers. Use the filename structures outlined in the task description.


Return Date to Students

Week 6 Tuesday (22 Apr 2025)

Due to April Public Holidays, and part time teaching staff, feedback will be returned within 10 working days to Moodle Gradebook.


Weighting
25%

Minimum mark or grade
Minimum 50% (i.e. 12.5 out of 25 marks) to pass.

Assessment Criteria

See the A1 Marking Rubric 2025 for points available for each section of the assignment. Your total points score out of 100 will be weighted at 25% of your OCCT13001 grade.

Group marks:

  1. Develops a case scenario that relates to key interventions for the work enabling context. (10 points)
  2. Describes the duties performed by an occupational therapist in the work enabling context (10 points)
  3. Selects and applies an appropriate occupational therapy practice model and explains a payment source. (10 points)
  4. Describes the contribution of key team members to client care. (10 points)
  5. Applies principles from occupational justice and contextually relevant legislation to concepts for client advocacy (10 points)
  6. Facilitates peer engagement in class discussion time that relates to presented content. (10 points)
  7. Uses multimedia and organisation of content to maximise available time within set limits. (10 points)

Individual Marks:

  1. Explains why the key professional source was relevant to the case study and topic. (10 points)
  2. Provides peers with an APA7 style Annotated Bibliography handout for 2 relevant sources. (10 points)
  3. Uses professional verbal and nonverbal communication. (use of eye contact, body language, speech volume, pace, pronunciation & enthusiasm). (10 points)


Referencing Style

Submission
Offline Online Group

Submission Instructions
Group to submit a completed CB84 Assignment coversheet, the PowerPoint and Presentation script to Moodle using the Filename structure in the Task Description. All students to submit their individual Annotated Bibliography handout to Moodle for marking and to the Moodle forum to share with peers.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe occupational therapy roles for enabling work participation
  • Integrate principles from the legislation and occupational justice when planning inclusive occupational therapy interventions that promote work participation.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Team Work
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation

2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title
Suitable Duties Plan

Task Description

Overview and Purpose:

As occupational therapists, we can give advice regarding a client’s occupational performance needs for work. In this assignment you will address the needs of a client at Level 1 of the Return-to-Work Hierarchy who is likely to return to the same job with the same employer. You will highlight principles related to section 228 of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 when discussing the obligations of the client’s employer. You will generate a realistic graded “Suitable Duties “plan for the worker observed during the in-class worksite evaluation.

 

Scenario:

You are the occupational therapist who has received the WorkCover referral for the university maintenance employee who has had a Grade 2 lower back strain from lifting heavy objects at work. The worker is keen to return to work in some capacity, however the supervisor has previously mentioned that he wants the worker to be fully fit before resuming work. You will need to explain the benefits of the “Suitable Duties” program and selected key points from the “Guideline for standard for rehabilitation” (2nd ed., 2023) to the supervisor so he agrees to participate. This will enable you to facilitate the worker’s return to work as a key part of an effective vocational rehabilitation program.

 

Your task:

You will document information in the "Job Analysis Template" after the workplace evaluation of one of the worker’s colleagues, to consider how to grade the usual work duties. You will interpret information from the workplace evaluation to help determine essential functional capacities for all usual work duties and to guide your recommended interventions. You will have access to additional information about the client from a written referral, the Oswestry Disability Index and Work Capacity Capabilities Form for the worker's job type.

 

Synthesising the information that you gather, you will develop tables for each of the four MOHO components: volition, habituation, performance capacity and the environment in the “Intervention planning template”. You will identify barriers and set goals for the client before developing an evidence-based range of work enabling interventions. Use in-text citations of references containing best practice evidence to support all your recommended interventions.


One of your intervention strategies will be to create a graded "Suitable Duties Plan" for your client using an industry standard template. You will discuss how this intervention will be negotiated with the worker, the supervisor and WorkCover Rehabilitation Counsellor and how it addresses principles from the “Guidelines for standard for rehabilitation”. You will provide a clearly documented schedule of hours and duties to gradually upgrade to all usual work duties over the 4-week period of the Suitable Duties Plan.


Use the Word document settings that are contained within the templates. You will submit the following files to Moodle:

  • Job Analysis Template (available on Moodle, 600 words ±10%)
  • Intervention Planning Template (available on Moodle, 2600 words ±10%)
  • WorkCover Queensland Suitable Duties template (available on Moodle, 150 words ±10%)
  • Completed CB84 Assignment coversheet.

Filenames for submission:

Name your Moodle file submissions as follows to expedite marking:

  • CB84 Assignment coversheet FirstnameLastname_A2CS e.g. SueJones_A2CS
  • Job Analysis Template: FirstnameLastname_JA e.g. SueJones_JA
  • Intervention Planning Template: FirstnameLastname_Ix e.g. SueJones_Ix
  • WorkCover Queensland Suitable Duties Template: FirstnameLastname_SD e.g. SueJones_SD

Use of professional language and medicolegal writing style is expected for this report:

Correct tense

  • Use third person past tense for history, assessment (e.g., client was referred, Assessments were carried out)
  • Use third person present tense for job analysis, identification of barriers (e.g., can, uses both hands)
  • Use third person future tense for Goals and intervention strategies (e.g., In 3 weeks, client will…., occupational therapist to provide…)

Be professional and accurate

  • Use professional terminology as discussed in OCCT13001 classes (e.g., workplace assessment, task modification, home exercise program)
  • Maintain an objective and factual tone with your content. Make sure you are cautious about information the client has reported but may not have any evidence for.
  • Avoid value judgements not based on fact (e.g., could barely drive, has a great family, is really wanting to work)
  • Carefully choose words that precisely reflect the intended meaning.

Be careful with the following

  • Do not use colloquial phrases unless it is presented as a “direct quote” from a client (e.g., it was “okay”, “took it easy”, “smokos”, etc.)
  • Do not use abbreviations or acronyms unless you have clearly defined what they mean first
  • Do not attribute blame to any person, this is not our role.

Communicate clearly:

  • Keep your sentences short and succinct. Do not include long sentences if you can use dot points.
  • This type of document can be subpoenaed to a court of law. It could be read by lawyers, judges, the client, and/or employer(s). Keep this in mind as you write your information.

Use of GenAI for this task:

You may use editing and citation tools such as Grammarly and Perplexity to assist you to improve your work. NO use of Generative Artifical Intelligence (GenAI similar to but not limited to CoPilot, Chat GPT etc.) is permitted for this assessment. Explain your ethical use of tools in the CB84 Assignment Coversheet to avoid Academic Misconduct reporting.

Word count:

Overall, we expect this assignment will take 3350 words ±10% to complete as per the suggested word counts for each document. In real world practice, the time taken to prepare long wordy reports may not be fully funded. Efficient production of written reports to meet industry standards is a critical professional skill to master.


Assessment Due Date

Week 8 Wednesday (7 May 2025) 11:55 pm AEST

Using filename structures outlined in the Task Description, submit all documents to Moodle by due date.


Return Date to Students

Week 10 Wednesday (21 May 2025)

Moodle Gradebook


Weighting
35%

Minimum mark or grade
Minimum 50% (i.e. 17.5 out of 35 marks) to pass

Assessment Criteria

Marking Criteria:

See the A2 Marking Rubric 2024 for points available for each section of the assignment. Your total points score out of 100 will be weighted at 35% of your OCCT13001 grade.

  1. Documents observations from the simulated worksite visit in the Job Analysis template. (10 points)
  2. Potential MOHO component barriers to desired outcomes are identified. (10 points)
  3. Work related goals for each barrier are presented. (10 points)
  4. Interventions to address volition and habituation goals are discussed. (2 X 5=10 points)
  5. Interventions to address performance capacity and environmental goals are discussed. (2 X 5=10 points)
  6. Outlines how the Suitable Duties plan will be negotiated with worker, supervisor, doctor, and insurer. (10 points)
  7. Presents a graded schedule of work hours and restrictions for a 4-week Suitable Duties plan. (10 points)
  8. Uses templates to record information about the client’s capabilities for work. (10 points)
  9. Word choices, language structure and style used is chosen to communicate intended meaning. (10 points)
  10. Evidence to justify best practice is cited and referenced in APA 7 style. (10 points)


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit your CB84 Assignment Coversheet, Job Analysis, Intervention Planning and Suitable Duties Plan as separate files to Moodle. Use the filename structures outlined in the task description.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Use selected occupational therapy assessment tools to identify barriers to work participation
  • Synthesise information from clients and stakeholders to set appropriate work participation goals
  • Develop work-based interventions using contemporary evidence and clearly communicated professional reasoning
  • Integrate principles from the legislation and occupational justice when planning inclusive occupational therapy interventions that promote work participation.


Graduate Attributes
  • Communication
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Information Technology Competence
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice
  • Social Innovation

3 Case Study

Assessment Title
Functional Capacity Assessment Report

Task Description

Overview and Purpose:

This assessment requires you to apply the work enabling skills and knowledge you have developed throughout this unit of study. Using a Generative AI tool, you will produce and edit a realistic Functional Capacity Assessment (FCA) report for a case study client with a disability who needs support to find and/or maintain a job.

 

Scenario: 

You are the occupational therapist who has received a referral for a client from the NDIS support coordinator. You have been asked to develop a list of necessary supports to facilitate a work enabling plan for a participant in line with their current functional capacities. You know that producing a complex FCA report takes many hours, and you wish to use GenAI to streamline how long it takes to do your work. Your clinical supervisor has already created an FCA report template and a simple cover letter format using GenAI. 

 

You realise that GenAI can produce “hallucinations” or off target responses. You are prepared to update and edit the GenAI responses until the FCA report is of similar accuracy and quality that you would produce without GenAI. You reason that this will be a more efficient use of time. Creating the best prompts to the GenAI tool will require you to select from one of the case study choices in Moodle as your referred client. You will upload the report template and deidentified details from your chosen case study history to your selected GenAI tool. You will develop appropriate prompts and engineer pathways for the GenAI tool in order to ethically and confidentially develop basic content for all of the FCA report headings and section requirements. 

 

After your GenAI tool has produced a response, you will use the “Track Changes” feature in Microsoft Word to analyse the report content.  You will highlight parts of the report that require editing and put a brief comment about what needs to be improved and why.  You will then revise your prompts and pathways so that the GenAI output is a more appropriate FCA report and provide manual edits to the updated report where needed for accuracy and clarity. You will insert the client identifying details and any other confidential information after your final GenAI response has been generated to ensure ethical practice and confidentiality is maintained.

 

You will submit an assignment coversheet, all GenAI prompts and responses including your “Track Changes” analysis comments. You will also submit the final edited version of the FCA report, which will be evaluated using the marking criteria. 

Filenames for submission:

Name your Moodle file submissions as follows to expedite marking:

  • Occupational therapy coversheet FirstnameLastname_A3CS e.g. SueJones_A3CS
  • Gen AI prompts: FirstnameLastname_GP e.g. SueJones_GP
  • Gen AI responses and Track changes comments: FirstnameLastname_Ix e.g. SueJones_GR
  • Final FCA report: FirstnameLastname_FCA e.g. SueJones_FCA

GenAI tools permitted for this assessment:

  • You are required to use the University subscription to Microsoft Copilot to complete this task.
  • You may use editing and citation tools such as Grammarly and Perplexity to assist you to improve your work.
  • Provide a detailed explanation of your ethical use of tools in the CB84 Assignment Coversheet to avoid Academic Misconduct reporting.

Word Count:

Please note that the word count for each section of the FCA report in the Task Instruction sheet on Moodle is a suggested maximum. Your GenAI tool may easily produce content well below the maximum word count. It is part of your professional learning to use your critical thinking skills at an intermediate level to analyse the GenAI response as part of your task performance. You will identify any gaps in the report content to decide whether the detail and number of words produced for each section is sufficient in your final FCA report to meet the marking criteria.

 

More details about the FCA report section requirements are available on Moodle. Templates for the FCA report and cover letter will be available on Moodle.


Assessment Due Date

Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 11:55 pm AEST

Using filename structures outlined in the Task Description, submit your coversheet, GenAI prompts, Gen AI responses and Track Changes comments, and Final FCA report to Moodle by due date.


Return Date to Students

Exam Week Friday (20 June 2025)

Moodle Gradebook


Weighting
40%

Minimum mark or grade
Minimum 50% (i.e. 20 out of 40 marks) to pass

Assessment Criteria

Marking Criteria:

The focus of marking for this task is the quality of the final FCA report, as expected in professional practice. The final FCA report represents the outcome of your professional and ethical use of GenAI to demonstrate capacity to meet the A3 task Learning Outcomes. Therefore the use of GenAI will not be directly marked.

 

See the A3 Marking Rubric 2025 for points available for each section of the assignment. Your total points score out of 80 will be divided by 2 to calculate your Assessment 3 grade. 

  1. Transfers client information to the template and provides a “Reason for the Report.”   (2.5 points)
  2. Provides professional statements for NDIS Participant goals (5 points)
  3. Includes relevant background and service information for the Participant (5 points)
  4. Functional capacities for client’s Activities of Daily Living are discussed (5 points)
  5. Functional capacities for client’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living are discussed (5 points)
  6. Functional capacities for client’s cognitive performance are discussed (5 points)
  7. Functional capacities for client’s social emotional skills are discussed (5 points)
  8. Assessment names and medical history are stated correctly and professionally. (5 points)
  9. Assessment results are interpreted and linked to relevant domains of participant functional performance (2 X 10 = 20 points) 
  10. Recommendations for work enabling supports required are presented in the template table (10 points)
  11. Statement of need explains why funding is reasonable and necessary (2.5 points)
  12. Writes a cover email to communicate with funding approvers. (5 points)
  13. Cites evaluation tool authors and high quality sources to substantiate recommended supports using APA7 style. (5 points)


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit your CB84 Assignment Coversheet, GenAI prompts, GenAI responses with comments and final FCA report as separate files to Moodle. Use the filename structures outlined in the task description.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Describe occupational therapy roles for enabling work participation
  • Use selected occupational therapy assessment tools to identify barriers to work participation
  • Synthesise information from clients and stakeholders to set appropriate work participation goals
  • Develop work-based interventions using contemporary evidence and clearly communicated professional reasoning


Graduate Attributes
  • Problem Solving
  • Critical Thinking
  • Information Literacy
  • Cross Cultural Competence
  • Ethical practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?