Overview
This unit examines clinical assessment and diagnostic reasoning to recognise and respond to a patient's deteriorating condition with appropriate and timely actions. This unit will enhance your knowledge of serious adverse events such as unexpected death and cardiac arrest which often follow observable deterioration in the patient’s condition. You will develop knowledge and skills in the early identification of deterioration, the initiation of prompt and effective action to minimise serious consequences, improve outcomes and lessen the level of intervention required to stabilise patients. The unit will focus on the underlying pathology of the patient's deteriorating condition and the interpretation of clinical manifestations to implement safe and effective nursing care. This unit will develop your theoretical knowledge of reflection in professional practice of nursing care coordination of the deteriorating patient.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Students must be enrolled in CL22 Master of Clinical Nursing or CL16 Graduate Certificate in Clinical Nursing to undertake this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2025
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
- Interpret and explain physiological and psychosocial clinical parameters indicating patient deterioration.
- Communicate effectively with interdisciplinary health teams, the patient and family to accurately transfer and escalate critical information.
- Initiate and evaluate nursing interventions based on clinical assessment and diagnostic results to optimise patient outcomes.
- Analyse a person-centred care approach to the deteriorating patient through critical self-reflection of professional practice.
N/A.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 100% | ||||
2 - Practical Assessment - 0% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
1 - Knowledge | ||||
2 - Communication | ||||
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||
4 - Research | ||||
5 - Self-management | ||||
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||
7 - Leadership | ||||
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Academic Learning Centre services
- Access to MIMS through the university library
- Endnote (available through Library - see Moodle link)
- Microsoft Word
- Zoom account (Free)
- CQU Library hosted Literature Databases
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
a.byrne@cqu.edu.au
j.l.baker@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Welcome to the unit.
Self-directed learning module.
Considering the deteriorating patient.
Clinical reasoning, patient deterioration and assessment frameworks.
Chapter
Review the Moodle site and click on all the links.
Review the recorded lecture and online Zoom tutorial timetable.
Find out what is in Student Support?
How do I find the Library?
Click on the link and learn what is the Academic Learning Centre?
Review the eReadings and activities as outlined in the module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Recorded presentations:
Welcome and Unit Introduction O Week.
Assessments 1 and 2.
Considering the deteriorating patient.
Assessments 1 and 2 - Review the assessment tasks and rubrics and make a study plan.
Activity – Access the General Discussion page and introduce yourself to your colleagues by providing your:
Name
Where you work
Why you are studying GCN.
Foundations of Academic Integrity Program - complete your annual program.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Module/Topic
Health Assessment - Primary and Secondary Survey.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 1 - Review Assessment requirements.
Assessment 2 - Commence practicing clinical skills.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Respiratory Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Recorded presentation - Listen to the presentation.
Assessment 1 - Start planning your assessment.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication
Module/Topic
Cardiovascular Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 1 - Continue preparing assessment.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Neurological Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Recorded presentation - Listen to the presentation.
Assessment 1 - Reflect on knowledge required to undertake this assessment.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Vacation week!
Chapter
Please use this mid-term break as an opportunity to rest and recover. Enjoy your break!
Events and Submissions/Topic
No timetabled learning activities.
Please use this week to progress your assessments.
Module/Topic
Gastrointestinal Tract Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Renal Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Recorded presentation - Listen to the presentation.
Assessment 1 - Finalise assessment.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Written case study Due: Week 7 Wednesday (30th April 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Written case study (100%) Due: Week 7 Wednesday (30 Apr 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Mental Health Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 2 - Practice your clinical skills for assessment two.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Special population groups and deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 2 - Work toward completing and passing assessment two.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Triage in the context of deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 2 - Work toward completing and passing assessment two.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Patient transfer in the context of the deteriorating patient.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Recorded presentation - Listen to the presentation.
Assessment 2 - Complete within the next week.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Module/Topic
Summary - Deterioration.
Chapter
Readings and activities as outlined in module.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Zoom - Drop-in question and answer, Unit content and assessments.
Assessment 2 - Finalise Assessment two.
Announcement and Discussion Boards - Check for posts and updates.
Student email - Check your student email at least twice per week for communication.
Practical Assessment Due: Week 12 Wednesday (4th June 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Practical Assessment Due: Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Nil
Chapter
Nil
Events and Submissions/Topic
Nil
Module/Topic
Nil
Chapter
Nil
Events and Submissions/Topic
Nil
As this unit is offered online, students are asked to prepare their own individual study plan to undertake self-directed study throughout the term. A key to your success is a strategic self-directed approach to learning and regular contact with your Unit Coordinator/s. Please check the Announcements page and unit content at least twice a week - there will be regular announcements about assessments and unit resources posted throughout the term and reviewing this information is essential to unit knowledge and your success. CQUniversity communicates with students through CQUniversity email. We recommend that you access your CQUniversity email at least twice a week so that you do not miss vital information about your studies.
1 Written Assessment
Unit Code: NURS20170
Unit Title: Patient Deterioration in the Clinical Setting
Assessment 1
Type: Written Case Study
Due Date: 4pm (AEST), Wednesday 30th April 2025 (Week 7)
Extensions: Available as per policy
Return Date: Wednesday 21st May 2025
Weighting: 100%
Length: 1000 words +/-10% (excluding reference list)
Unit Coordinator/s: Dr Amy-Louise Byrne
Learning outcomes assessed
1. Interpret and explain physiological and psychosocial clinical parameters indicating patient deterioration.
2. Communicate effectively with interdisciplinary health teams, the patient and family to accurately transfer and escalate critical information.
3. Initiate and evaluate nursing interventions based on clinical assessment and diagnostic results to optimise patient outcomes.
4. Analyse a person-centred care approach to the deteriorating patient through critical self-reflection of professional practice.
Aim
The aim of this assessment is for you to demonstrate your knowledge, understanding and critical thinking about clinical deterioration using a case study.
Instructions
Read the case study below and associated clinical documentation. Please follow the steps below to write your academic essay and complete the assessment task.
1. Using the case study provided below, choose one sign of clinical deterioration. Using relevant up-to- date evidence, discuss why this is occurring and why this is an indicator of deterioration with specific reference to pathophysiology (approximately 200 words).
2. Critique the ISBAR script provided in the case study and identify two (2) areas that can be improved to facilitate safe patient transfer of care. Using relevant and contemporary evidence, discuss how the communication can be improved to facilitate patient safety (approximately 300 words).
3. Recommend one nurse-led intervention and support this with relevant contemporary evidence, to improve patient outcomes (approximately 200 words).
4. Reflect upon your learning from the case study. Identify one area within the case study in which person-centred care needs to be improved. Using relevant and contemporary literature, reflect upon the role of person-centred care and how it can improve communication and patient outcomes. Reflect upon how you will embed this learning into your future practice. Use the ‘what, so what, now what’ framework for this reflection (approximately 300 words).
Case Study:
Max is a 22-year-old man who lives at home with his parents. Max is an apprentice roofer, and he works full time. Max is an active person who plays for the local soccer team. He has no medical history, is a social drinker and occasional smoker.
Max was at work on a hot day and was assisting a colleague to move sheeting to the roof via a ladder. Max misjudged the ladder step, lost his footing and fell onto the ground below, from a height of approximately 2 metres. Max landed on his shoulder and hit the left side of his head. Max was ‘dazed’ but reports that he did not lose consciousness. Max stayed as still as possible, and his work colleagues called for an ambulance.
The ambulance team assessed Max, who reported no history. Max was orientated to time and place, though was anxious about the situation and potentially missing work. The assessment from the ambulance was as follows:
A- Patent
B- Rapid, respiratory rate 27 bpm, oxygen saturation 96% on room air
C- Capillary refill 2 seconds, blood pressure 135/76 mmHg, heart rate 110 bpm and regular
D- Alert and orientated GCS 15, blood glucose level 4.2mmol
E- Dressed appropriately for the weather, temperature 37 degrees Celsius.
The ambulance team applied a cervical collar as a precaution and transported Max to the regional hospital nearby. At the rural hospital, the following ISBAR handover was provided to hospital staff, away from Max.
I “The patient here is Max. He’s a young fella who was mucking about on the ladder and fell from a height of about 2 metres.”
S “His work mates were all in a flap when we arrived, not managing the situation well. When we arrived, he was laying on the ground and you could see they were uncomfortable. I think he’s hurt their pride more than their head.
B “Max doesn’t have any other medical history”. Max states that he didn’t lose consciousness; his work mates weren’t much help in that respect. Max states that he hit his shoulder first, the left side of head.”
A “Breathing is a little fast. Oxygen is fine. GCS is 15, orientated to time and place, was more worried about going back to work than anything. All the other observations are written down if you want them.”
R “So he’s here to be checked over, I guess. I think one of his work mates is here too. They’ve been asking me to call his mum, but I didn’t do that, didn’t have time.”
You accept handover from the ambulance service and introduce yourself to Max. Your assessment is completed as follows:
A Patent, speaking in full sentences
B RR 28 bpm, oxygen saturations 96% on room air.
C Blood pressure 140/82 mmHg, blood glucose 4.6 mmol.
D Alert and orientated, GCS 13, is confused to time and place and is asking when the next load of sheeting will arrive.
E Temperature 36 degrees Celsius.
F Heart Rate 120 BPM, Pain 6/10 shoulder pain and a headache.
Literature and references
In this assessment use at least 5 contemporary references (7 years old or less) to support your discussion. You may also use seminal scholarly literature where relevant. Suitable references include peer-reviewed journal articles as well as textbooks and credible websites. When sourcing information, consider the 5 elements of a quality reference: currency, authority, relevance, objectivity, and coverage. Grey literature sourced from the internet must be from reputable websites such as government, university, or peak national bodies: for example, the Australian College of Nursing, the Australian Association of Social Workers, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Note, that websites such as StatPearls, Life in the Fastlane, and Wikipedia are not suitable for this assessment task. Lecture notes are not primary sources of evidence and should not be used in this assessment. All resources, other than web pages and grey literature, must be sources from the CQUniversity library.
Requirements
· Use a cover page for your assignment that includes in the following order:
· Student name
· Student number
· Unit code and name
· Assessment type
· Due date
· In-text word count
· Use of Gen AI: Gen AI agent…has been used for editing and proofreading this assessment (insert or delete as applicable).
· Use a conventional and legible size 12 font, such as Times New Roman, with 2.0 line spacing and 2.54cm page margins (standard pre-set margin in Microsoft Word).
· Include page numbers on the top right side of each page in a header.
· Indent the first line of each paragraph 1.27cm (standard pre-set indent in Microsoft Word).
· An introduction and conclusion are not required for this assessment, instead, use headings to format your work.
· All questions in the Instructions of this assessment must be attempted and clearly answered to pass this assessment task.
· Write in the first-person perspective for your reflection, however, write in the third-person perspective when referring to the literature.
· Use formal academic, discipline specific, professional and inclusive language.
· Use Microsoft Word English (Australia) spelling and grammar checker.
· Paraphrase, summarise or quote information acknowledging the original source (referencing) to avoid plagiarism.
· Follow academic writing conventions: spell out contractions in full; introduce abbreviations and acronyms; spell out numbers for zero through nine and use numerals for numbers 10 and above.
· All work submitted must be your own work.
· Start your reference list on a separate page to the body of your assessment.
· Use the seventh edition American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style. The CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre has an online APA Referencing Style Guide.
· The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. The word count excludes the reference list but includes in-text references and direct quotations.
Resources
1. You can use unit-provided materials and other credible sources (e.g., journal articles, and books) to reference your argument. The quality and credibility of your sources are important. Please note, that lecture notes are not peer-reviewed primary sources of evidence.
2. We recommend that you access your discipline-specific Nursing Resource Guide Or the Social Work and Human Services Guide.
3. You may like to manage your citations and reference list. Information on how to use academic referencing software (EndNote) is available at the CQUniversity Library website should you wish to learn how to use it.
4. For information on academic writing and referencing, please visit the Academic Learning Centre Moodle site. The Academic Communication section has many helpful resources, including information for students with English as a second language.
5. You may wish to submit a draft to Studiosity.
6. Submit at least one draft before the due date to review your Turnitin Similarity Score before making a final submission. Instructions are available here.
Academic Integrity
1. You must abide by the principles of academic integrity (see Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure). Completion of this assessment with another party or sharing of responses is not permitted at any time.
2. The use of any generative artificial intelligence is permitted for the following purposes:
· Gen AI content is used to generate general structures.
· Gen AI content editing.
· Checking spelling and grammar (for example, Grammarly).
If you use Gen AI to generate ideas, you are required to reference the Gen AI agent as per APA 7th guidelines. If you are using a Gen AI agent for content editing, please complete the declaration on the title page of your assessment. If Gen AI is not used, please delete this declaration.
Submission
Submit your assessment via the unit Moodle site in Microsoft Word format only.
Late penalties of 5% per day of the available mark may be applied as per the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Contact TASAC if you experience technical issues submitting your assessment:
· Phone toll-free 1300 666 620
· Email tasac@cqu.edu.au
Marking Criteria
Refer to the marking rubric on the Moodle site for more detail on how marks will be assigned. To achieve a passing grade for this unit you are required to pass this assessment item. If you do not receive a passing grade, you may be eligible for a re-attempt. A re-attempt is where you are given a second opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of one or more of the unit’s learning outcomes before you can progress to new learning or participate in subsequent learning activities. You may be given the opportunity to re-attempt an assessment but will only achieve a mark no greater than the minimum for a pass standard for the assessment. You must:
have shown a reasonable attempt to complete the initial assessment task
be granted a re-attempt by your Unit Lead/Coordinator
make changes to the nominated assessment task which you have failed and resubmit the revised work for marking within seven consecutive days, no assessment extensions will be approved.
Please note: Only one opportunity for a re-attempt is allowed.
Minimum Pass Criteria
· You must achieve a minimum grade of 50% to pass this assessment.
· You must achieve a cumulative grade of at least 49.5% across all assessments to pass this unit.
· In order to be eligible for a supplementary assessment, all assessment tasks must be reasonably attempted in this unit.
· You must also complete and pass assessment two to pass this unit.
Week 7 Wednesday (30 Apr 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 10 Wednesday (21 May 2025)
Key Criteria |
High Distinction 84.5–100% |
Distinction 74.50–84.49% |
Credit 64.50–74.49% |
Credit 64.50–74.49% |
Fail <49.5% |
Clinical indicator of deterioration (20%) |
(20–17) Identifies and comprehensively discusses one indicator of clinical deterioration with reference to pathophysiology. Argument is comprehensively and logically supported with relevant literature and relates to the case study |
(16.9-15) Identifies and concisely discusses one indicator of clinical deterioration with reference to pathophysiology. Argument is well supported with relevant literature and relates to the case study. |
(14.9-13) Identifies and clearly discusses one indicator of clinical deterioration with reference to pathophysiology. Argument is supported with relevant literature and relates to the case study. |
(12.9-10) Identifies and discusses one indicator of clinical deterioration with reference to pathophysiology, however, there are some gaps in discussion. Argument is somewhat supported with literature and relates to the case study. |
(9.9–0) Does not identify or does not adequately identify one indicator of clinical deterioration. Little or no reference to pathophysiology Argument is not supported with literature and/or does not relate to the case study. |
Handover critique (20%) |
(20–17) Comprehensively and succinctly critiques ISBAR and identified and comprehensively discusses two areas for improvement. The link to patient safety is concise, clear and logical. |
(16.9-15) Critiques ISBAR in detail and identified and succinctly discusses two areas for improvement. The link to patient safety is clear and logical. |
(14.9-13) Critiques ISBAR and identified and discusses two areas for improvement. The link to patient safety is touched upon. |
(12.9-10) Critiques ISBAR and identified and discusses two areas for improvement. The link to patient safety is touched upon. |
(9.9–0) Does not critique the ISBAR and/or identified and discussed two areas for improvement. The link to patient safety is not appropriate or made. |
Recommendations and justification of nurse-led intervention (20%) |
(20–17) Identifies and comprehensively recommends and justifies one nurse-led intervention that is relevant to the case study, and details how this intervention will improve patient outcomes. |
(16.9-15) Identifies, recommends, and justifies one nurse-led intervention that is relevant to the case study, and details how this intervention will improve patient outcomes. |
(14.9-13) Identifies and recommends one nurse led intervention that is relevant to the case study, and details how this intervention will improve patient outcomes. Justification of nurse-led intervention is proposed. |
(12.9-10) Identifies one nurse led intervention that is relevant to the case study, and details how this intervention will improve patient outcomes is attempted. Justification of nurse-led intervention is attempted however further detail is required. |
(9.9-0) Does not identify one relevant nurse led intervention, nor detail of the intervention and the link to improved patient outcomes. Justification of the nurse-led intervention is incorrect or omitted. |
Reflection on learning (20%) |
(20-17) Comprehensively and succinctly reflects on the case study, using the what, so what, what now, framework. Reflects on own practice with appropriate and comprehensive details of how this will be embedded into future practice. |
(16.9-15) Concisely reflects, on the case study, using the what, so what, what now, framework. Reflects on own practice with appropriate and clear details of how this will be embedded into future practice. |
(14.9-13) Reflects on the case study, using the what, so what, what now, framework. Reflects on own practice with appropriate details of how this will be embedded into future practice. |
(12.9-10) Some reflection on the case study, some use of the what, so what, what now, framework. Reflects on own practice with some appropriate details of how this will be embedded into future practice. |
(9.9–0) Limited or no reflection on the case study, and/or the what, so what, what now framework. Little or no reflection on own practice with little or no details of how this will be embedded into future practice. |
Professional writing and presentation (10%) |
(10–8.5) Content is clear, accurate, and presented in a logical, succinct order demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of the topic. Meticulous presentation of assessment, double-line spaced with 12-point font, and Arial or Times New Roman font. There are no errors in English grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The language of the discipline is comprehensively used. The assessment is substantiated with a minimum of 8, appropriate contemporary peer-reviewed journal articles. Formatting requirements applied without error. Adheres to the word count. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. |
(8.4–7.5) Content is frequently clear, correct and presented in a logical order demonstrating a good understanding of the topic. Well-presented assessment, double-line spaced with 12-point font, and Arial or Times New Roman font. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 1 error. The language of the discipline is frequently used. The assessment is substantiated with a minimum of 7 appropriate contemporary peer-reviewed journal articles. Formatting requirements applied with 1 error. Adheres to the word count. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. |
(7.4–6.5) Content is mostly clear, correct and presented in a logical order demonstrating a sound understanding of the topic. Excellent presentation of assessment, double-line spaced with 12-point font Arial or Times New Roman font. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 2 errors. The language of the discipline is mostly used. The assessment is substantiated with at least 6 appropriate contemporary peer-reviewed journal articles. Formatting requirements applied with 2 errors. Adheres to the word count. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. |
(6.4–5) Content is frequently clear, correct and presented in a logical order demonstrating a reasonable understanding of the topic. Assessment presented with double-line spacing, 12-point font, and Arial or Times New Roman font. English grammar, spelling, and punctuation conventions have 3 errors. The language of the discipline is used. The assessment is substantiated with 5 contemporary peer-reviewed mostly appropriate journal articles. Formatting requirements applied with 3 errors. Adheres to the word count. Writing reflects students own work and adheres to the principles of academic integrity. |
(4.9–0) Content is consistently unclear or incorrect and is disorganised demonstrating insufficient understanding of the topic. Poorly presented assessment, double-line spacing, 12-point font, and Arial or Times New Roman font incorrectly or not used. English grammar, spelling and punctuation conventions have ≥4 errors. The language of the discipline is infrequently or incorrectly used. The assessment is substantiated with ≤4 contemporary peer-reviewed, appropriate journal articles. Formatting requirements applied with ≥4 errors. Deviates +/- 10% of the word count. Writing may not reflect students own work and may not adhere to the principles of academic integrity. |
Referencing (10%) |
(10–8.5) Acknowledges all sources and meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with no errors. Literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library. |
(8.4–7.5) Acknowledges majority of sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 1 error. The majority of literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library. |
(7.4–6.5) Acknowledges most sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 2 errors. Most literature cited has been published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library. |
(6.4–5.0) Acknowledges sources and/or meets APA (7th Edition) referencing standards with 3 errors. Some literature cited is published in the last 7 years and sourced from the CQUniversity library. |
(4.9–0) Multiple sources not acknowledged and/or ≥4 APA (7th Edition) referencing errors or references not provided. Some literature cited is published ≥7 years and/or not sourced from the CQUniversity library. |
No submission method provided.
- Interpret and explain physiological and psychosocial clinical parameters indicating patient deterioration.
- Communicate effectively with interdisciplinary health teams, the patient and family to accurately transfer and escalate critical information.
- Initiate and evaluate nursing interventions based on clinical assessment and diagnostic results to optimise patient outcomes.
- Analyse a person-centred care approach to the deteriorating patient through critical self-reflection of professional practice.
2 Practical Assessment
Unit Code: NURS20170
Unit Title: Patient Deterioration in the Clinical Setting
Assessment 2
Type: Practical Assessment
Due date: 5 pm (AEST), Wednesday 4th June 2025 (Week 12)
Extensions: Available as per policy
Return date: See information below
Weighting: PASS/FAIL (0%). You must pass this assessment to pass
the unit.
Unit Coordinators: Dr Amy Byrne and Jill Baker
The completed Marking Rubric must be submitted to the assessment portal by 5pm (AEST) Wednesday 4th June (Week 12).
Learning Outcomes Assessed
1. Interpret and explain physiological and psychosocial clinical parameters indicating patient deterioration.
2. Communicate effectively with interdisciplinary health teams, the patient and family to accurately transfer and escalate critical information.
3. Initiate and evaluate nursing interventions based on clinical assessment and diagnostic results to optimise patient outcomes.
4. Analyse a person-centred care approach to the deteriorating patient through critical self-reflection of professional practice.
Aim
The aim of this clinical assessment is for you to demonstrate your knowledge and skills in the early identification of a patient's deteriorating condition and the initiation of prompt and effective actions to minimise serious consequences, improve outcomes and lessen the level of intervention required to stabilise the patient. The assessment will also assess your knowledge of the pathology of a patient's deteriorating condition, and your ability to interpret clinical manifestations and effectively communicate these changes in health to team members including the patient.
Instructions
You are required to demonstrate the safe care of a deteriorating patient in a simulated clinical setting. This assessment is undertaken at a skill station(s); this structure may vary across Health Services. You may be required to rotate between skill stations. You will have the opportunity to practice the skills you will be assessed on prior to the clinical simulation.
Please follow the steps below to complete your assessment task:
Step 1. Familiarise yourself with the relevant policies, procedures, and legislation available on the unit Moodle site and in your Health Service.
Step 2. Familiarise yourself with Standard 8, Recognising and responding to acute deterioration standard (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, [ACSQH] 2017). Standard 3, Personal Care and Clinical Care (The Aged Care Quality and Safety Standards) will assist students undertaking this assessment from an aged care perspective.
Step 3. Stage 1 – practice your skills in recognising and responding to deteriorating patients rotating through skill stations.
Step 4. Stage 2 – demonstrate and explain your ability to recognise and safely respond to the deteriorating patient including:
· Initial nursing management.
· Verbalising a targeted systematic assessment approach (look, listen and feel ABCDEFG) [this worksheet is available on the Moodle site] or you may use an alternative patient assessment framework, such as the primary/secondary assessment/survey, body systems or head-to-toe assessment.
· Recording and verbalising vital signs.
· Communicating escalation concerns using ISBAR.
· Managing basic airway manoeuvres, adjuncts, and oxygen therapy delivery devices.
· Identifying further clinical risk factors and additional investigations that may be required.
· Selecting and inserting a naso/oropharyngeal airway.
· Demonstrating chin lift, head tilt and manual ventilation techniques.
· Demonstrating and instructing on the use of nasal prongs, Hudson mask, non-rebreather masks, bag-valve-mask (BVM), and high flow nasal oxygen therapy.
Submission
Upload your completed rubric, signed by your Graduate Program Coordinator (for students enrolled in a partnered Graduate Program) or Assessor (for students not enrolled in a partnered Graduate Program) and yourself to the Assessment Two portal in the Unit Moodle site. Please note that the submission of fraudulent assessment results by a student will result in the notification to Ahpra of such an occurrence.
Marking Criteria
Refer to the marking rubric on the unit Moodle site for more details on how marks will be assigned.
To achieve a pass grade for this unit you are required to pass this assessment item.
If you do not receive a pass grade, you may be eligible for a re-attempt. A re-attempt is where you are given a second opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of one or more of the unit’s learning outcomes before you can progress to new learning or participate in subsequent learning activities. You may be given the opportunity to re-attempt an assessment but will only achieve a mark no greater than the minimum for a pass standard for the assessment. You must:
· have shown a reasonable attempt to complete the initial assessment task
· be granted a re-attempt by your Unit Lead/Coordinator
· make changes to the nominated assessment task which you have failed and resubmit the revised work for marking within seven consecutive days, no assessment extensions will be approved.
Please note: Only one opportunity for a re-attempt is allowed.
All students (partnered and non-partnered students) who are offered an assessment re-attempt are required to discuss assessment re-attempt preparation and due date with their Graduate Program Coordinator (for students enrolled in a partnered Graduate Program) or Assessor (for students not enrolled in a partnered Graduate Program).
Minimum Pass Criteria
· You must achieve a Pass in all criteria to pass this assessment.
· You must complete and pass assessment two to pass this unit.
· You must achieve a cumulative grade of at least 49.5% across all assessments to pass this unit.
· In order to be eligible for a supplementary assessment, all assessment tasks must be reasonably attempted in this unit.
Week 12 Wednesday (4 June 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Exam Week Wednesday (18 June 2025)
No submission method provided.
- Interpret and explain physiological and psychosocial clinical parameters indicating patient deterioration.
- Communicate effectively with interdisciplinary health teams, the patient and family to accurately transfer and escalate critical information.
- Initiate and evaluate nursing interventions based on clinical assessment and diagnostic results to optimise patient outcomes.
- Analyse a person-centred care approach to the deteriorating patient through critical self-reflection of professional practice.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe383/fe3832c966a7b299a1c9e7915f0f7c023a16c471" alt=""