CQUniversity Unit Profile.

Criteria

HD

                           (85-100%)

D

C

P

F

Question 1: Socio-cultural factors and text-message interventions for Indigenous Australian health.

 Weight 20%

Presents a comprehensive, clear and detailed analysis of socio-cultural factors affecting text-message interventions. The suggested strategy is highly innovative and culturally relevant.

 (20 – 16.9)

Presents a clear and detailed analysis of socio-cultural factors affecting text-message interventions. The suggested strategy is innovative and culturally relevant.

  (16.8 – 14.9)

Presents a clear analysis of socio-cultural factors affecting text-message interventions. The suggested strategy is practical and culturally relevant.

 (14.8 – 12.9)

Presents a satisfactory analysis of socio-cultural factors affecting text-message interventions. The suggested strategy is adequate and culturally relevant.

 (12.8 – 9.9)

Unsatisfactory analysis of socio-cultural factors affecting text-message interventions. The suggested strategy is inadequate or culturally relevant.

 (9.8 – 0)

Question 2: Challenges and nursing approaches for Indigenous Australian health management.

Provides an insightful and comprehensive analysis of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in managing chronic diseases. The suggested nursing approach is highly innovative and culturally sensitive.

(20 – 16.9)

A convincing and detailed analysis of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in managing chronic diseases. The suggested nursing approach is innovative and culturally sensitive.

 (16.8 – 14.9)

A sound critical analysis of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in managing chronic diseases. The suggested approach is practical and culturally sensitive.

 (14.8 – 12.9)

A satisfactory analysis of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in managing chronic diseases. The suggested approach is adequate and culturally sensitive.

 (12.8 – 9.9)

An unsatisfactory analysis of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in managing chronic diseases. The suggested approach is inadequate and culturally inappropriate.

 (9.8 – 0)

Question 3: Overcoming barriers to engagement and communication strategies

Provides an excellent discussion of potential barriers to engagement with text-message interventions. The proposed communication strategy is highly innovative and culturally relevant.

Provides a very good discussion of potential barriers to engagement with text-message interventions. The communication strategy is innovative and culturally relevant.

Provides a sound discussion of potential barriers to engagement with text-message interventions. The communication strategy is practical and culturally relevant.

Provides a satisfactory discussion of potential barriers to engagement with text-message interventions. The communication strategy is adequate and culturally relevant.

Vague or unsatisfactory discussion of potential barriers to engagement with text-message interventions. The communication strategy is inadequate or culturally relevant.

Question 4: Education plan for Indigenous Australian consumers with chronic conditions.

Presents an exceptionally detailed and culturally sensitive education plan. The plan integrates patient education, lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and follow-up care with innovative strategies to ensure cultural relevance.

Presents a very good culturally sensitive education plan. The plan integrates patient education, lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and follow-up care with effective strategies to ensure cultural relevance.

Presents an adequate culturally sensitive education plan. The plan integrates patient education, lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and follow-up care with sound strategies to ensure cultural relevance. 

Presents a satisfactory education plan. The plan integrates some patient education, lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and follow-up care with adequate strategies to ensure cultural relevance.

 (12.8 – 9.9)

Presents an unsatisfactory education plan. The plan integrates minimal to no patient education, lifestyle changes, medication adherence, and follow-up care with no strategies to ensure cultural relevance. 

Use of evidence

Weight 5%

An extensive range of
relevant literature from
scholarly sources have been
used discerningly to support
the assessment.

(5 – 4.2)

An in-depth range of relevant
literature from scholarly
sources have been used to
effectively support the assessment.

(4.1 – 3.7)

A sound range of literature
from scholarly sources has
been used adequately to
support the assessment.

(3.6 – 3.2)

A satisfactory range of
literature from scholarly
sources, some of which are
not credible or relevant, have
been referred to in the assessment.

(3.1 – 2.5)

The literature used is largely
irrelevant or not credible OR
no literature is used to
support the assessment.

(2.4 - 0)

Format of references as per APA 7th edition

Weight 5%

APA 7th edition referencing
conventions in both in-text
referencing and reference list
have always been applied
accurately and consistently.

(5 – 4.2)

APA 7th edition referencing
conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list has been used almost
always accurately and
consistently.

(4.1 – 3.7)

APA 7th edition referencing
conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list is used with few errors or
minor inconsistencies.

(3.6 – 3.2)

Attempts made to adhere to
APA 7th edition referencing
conventions in both in-text
referencing and the reference
list, but with some errors and
inconsistencies.

(3.1 – 2.5)

Adherence to APA 7th edition
referencing conventions in
both in-text referencing and
the reference list is minimal or
non-existent.

(2.4 - 0)

Format and presentation

Weight 10%

Sophisticated language, including use of accurate terminology. Highly effective sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Very well-constructed sentences and correct punctuation and spelling. 

(10 – 8.5)

Effective language, including use of accurate terminology. Effective sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Well-constructed sentences and very minor punctuation and spelling errors. 

(8.4 – 7.5)

Sound language, including use of accurate terminology. Logical sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Soundly constructed sentences and minor punctuation and spelling errors. 

(7.4 – 6.5)

Basic language, including use of largely accurate terminology. Largely logical sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Satisfactorily constructed sentences and minor punctuation and spelling errors. 

(6.4 – 5.0)

Poor language, including use of inaccurate terminology. Inconsistent sequencing and structure of paragraphs in body. Poorly constructed sentences and significant punctuation and spelling errors.

(4.9 – 0)

An engaging and well-planned assessment. The assessment material is logical, clear, concise, and convincing. The template provided is used.

5.00-4.23

A well-planned, logical, and clear submission. The assessment material is generally logical, concise, and convincing. The template provided is used.

4.22-3.73

The submission needs to be more concise and convincing but is primarily comprehensive. The template provided is used.

3.72-3.23

The submission is presented, needs more flow and is more concise and comprehensive. The template provided is used.

3.22-2.48

The submission could be clearer. It is not logical OR unclear OR is perfunctory. The template provided is used.

2.47-0.00

No flow to the presentation. The template provided is not used.

0

Clear and succinct introduction that outlines the information requested and the direction of the paper. Written material is free from spelling, grammar, and structural errors. A conclusion that clearly and succinctly brings the assessment to a close.

5.00-4.23

Clear and appropriate introduction that outlines the information requested and the direction of the paper. There are 1-2 errors (in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure) that do not affect the meaning and flow of the submission. A conclusion that clearly and appropriately brings the assessment to a close.

4.22-3.73

Appropriate introduction that outlines the information requested and the direction of the paper. There are 3-4 errors (in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure) that do not affect the meaning and flow of the submission. The conclusion outlines most of the main points and brings some sense of closure.

3.72-3.23

An introduction is apparent, although it consists only of a list of the paper’s contents. There are 4-5 errors (in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure) that do not affect the meaning and flow of the submission. Conclusion apparent – outlines most of the main points and endeavours to bring the argument to a close –some incongruity.

3.22-2.48

No recognisable introduction. There is no direction offered in respect of the paper. There are >5 errors (in spelling, grammar, and paragraph structure) that affect the meaning and flow of the submission. No recognisable conclusion – a little reference to the main points does not offer a clear conclusion to the paper.

2.47-0.00

No evidence of an introduction or conclusion. Grammatical errors prevent understanding large tracts of the submission.

0

Comprehensive (thorough) discussion of lived experience of John addressed all the points requested in the task description. All content relates to John. 

50.00-42.01

A detailed discussion of the lived experience of John addressing 3 out of 4 points requested. All content relates to John.

42.00-37.01

A detailed discussion of the lived experience of John addressing 3 out of 4 points requested. All content relates to John.

37.00-32.01

A basic discussion of the lived experience of John addressing 2 out of 4 points requested. All content relates to John.

32.00-24.51

Minimal/No discussion of the lived experience of John addresses only 1-2 out of 4 points requested. little content relates to John.

24.50-0.00

No discussion of the person’s lived experience with a chronic health condition was provided. No template used

0

The discharge plan comprehensively covers the content requested and is entirely relevant to the requested tasks.

30.00-25.21

The discharge plan is detailed, covers the content requested and is relevant to the requested tasks.

25.20-22.23

The discharge plan is detailed, covers the content requested and is entirely relevant to the requested tasks.

22.22-19.21

The basic discharge plan covers the content requested and is somewhat relevant to the requested tasks.

19.20-14.71

The discharge plan content is irrelevant and does not address all the requested tasks.

14.70-0.00

A discharge plan not provided. There is no relation to John and his requirements.

0

Accurate APA referencing in text and reference list with no errors. A maximum of 10 references is required to support statements.

10-8.45

APA referencing is used in the text, and the reference list may have 1-2 consistent formatting errors (may be made multiple times). 8-10 references are used to support statements.

8.44-7.45

APA referencing is used in the text, and the reference list may have 3-4 consistent formatting errors (may be made multiple times). 6-8 references are used to support statements.

7.44-6.45

APA referencing is used in the text, and the reference list may have 4-5 consistent formatting errors (may be made multiple times). At least 5 references are used to support statements.

6.44-4.95

APA referencing is used in the text and in the reference list and may have at most 5 consistent formatting errors (may be made multiple times). Less than 5 references are used to support statements.

4.94-0.00

No relevant references were noted.

0