Overview
The effective training and development of employees is critical for the sustainability and growth of organisations. This unit will provide you an understanding of the role of human resource training and development (T&D) function in an organisation, as well as the underlying concepts and principles upon which T&D is based. You will gain knowledge and skills to evaluate T&D needs, recommend appropriate interventions, evaluate T&D outcomes, and experience the role of a trainer and a trainee. The unit will also provide you an overview of contemporary developments in the field of T&D and the role of T&D in broader management and organisational strategy.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2026
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Informal student feedback via messages and class discussion
Weekly Summary Sheets
Students requested a one-page weekly summary to help consolidate key concepts, especially for those balancing study with work or family commitments. In response, weekly summary sheets were piloted in 2025 Term 1, offering concise snapshots of each topic. Based on positive student engagement, this initiative should continue in future offerings and be introduced earlier in the term to support consistent engagement.
Feedback from Student survey and direct feedback
Later Class Times
Later Class Times will be reviewed.
Feedback from Teaching team reflections and student comments during the term
Assessment Structure and Design
Although the current assessment structure is effective, there is potential to refine it to further support scaffolded learning. For example, integrating more formative checkpoints or clearer alignment between assessment tasks and weekly activities could help students track their progress more effectively. A review of the structure before the next offering is recommended.
- Demonstrate understanding of the concepts, principles and theories of training and development
- Assess the link between training and development and broader organisational issues and strategies
- Evaluate training and development needs in a practical workplace context, design appropriate interventions, and evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions
- Examine training and development opportunities and challenges in contemporary workplaces
- Synthesise concepts and theories covered in the unit to develop training and development interventions for practical workplace contexts.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Group Work - 15% | |||||
| 2 - Presentation - 40% | |||||
| 3 - Written Assessment - 45% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Communication | |||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | |||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | |||||
| 5 - Team Work | |||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | |||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | |||||
| 10 - First Nations Knowledges | |||||
| 11 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Textbooks
Employee Training & Development
Edition: Ninth (2023)
Authors: Raymond A. Noe
McGraw Hill
ISBN: 9781264080922
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Zoom access
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.veres@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction to Employee Training and Development and the Australian Training Context
Chapter
Chapter 1
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 1 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Strategic Training
Chapter
Chapter 2
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 2 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Training needs assessment
Chapter
Chapter 3
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 3 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Learning and transfer of training
Chapter
Chapter 4
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 4 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Group registration - Due: Week 4 Monday 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Program design
Chapter
Chapter 5
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 5 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Traditional training methods
Chapter
Chapter 7
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 6 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Contemporary methods of training: Technology based training methods
Chapter
Chapter 8
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 7 section
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Training evaluation
Chapter
Chapter 6
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 8 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Employee development
Chapter
Chapter 9
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 9 section
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Career management
Chapter
Chapter 9
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 10 section
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Social Responsibility: Legal Issues, Managing Diversity, and Career Challenges
Chapter
Chapter 10
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 11 section
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
The future of training and development
Chapter
Chapter 11
Other relevant articles and resources in the Unit Moodle site, Week 12 section.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
There is no exam for this Unit.
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Group Work
Purpose
This assessment develops students’ ability to apply training and development theory to a practical organisational context while working effectively in a small team. Students will undertake a simulated Training Needs Assessment to identify, analyse, and respond to a skills or performance gap within an organisation.
The task is designed to build core professional capabilities, including analytical reasoning, evidence-based decision-making, professional business writing, oral communication, and collaborative work practices.
Description
In a group of two (2), students will assume the role of HR Training and Development Consultants engaged to investigate a perceived training or development issue within a selected organisation. The task requires groups to design and justify an appropriate Training Needs Assessment approach, analyse the results, and develop a targeted training or development recommendation aligned with organisational needs.
Students must apply relevant training and development concepts, frameworks, and contemporary academic literature to:
- identify and clearly define the nature of the training or development gap
- justify the selection of needs assessment methods
- analyse and interpret the findings of the needs assessment
- recommend a suitable training or development intervention, including its scope, target audience, and expected outcomes
The assessment outputs are a professional business report and a recorded PowerPoint presentation prepared for a senior management audience.
This assessment consists of the following components:
- Training Needs Assessment Report (group submission, approximately 1600 words)
- PowerPoint presentation recording, communicating the report findings (group submission, approximately 8 minutes total)
- Self-evaluation and contribution analysis (individual submission using the prescribed template)
Groups must register via Moodle by Week 4, Monday, 30 March 2026, 11.45 pm AEST.
The Training Needs Assessment Report, PowerPoint presentation recording, and individual self-evaluation are due by Week 6, Monday, 13 April 2026, 11.45 pm AEST.
Detailed instructions, templates, and submission requirements are provided on Moodle and must be reviewed prior to commencing the assessment.
Late submission penalties apply in accordance with University policy.
Week 6 Monday (13 Apr 2026) 11:45 pm AEST
All written submissions must be uploaded through the assessment link and format in Moodle. Your Report must be uploaded in Word format as a .doc or .docx file. Do not upload a PDF file. Your PowerPoint must be uploaded as a .ppt or .pptx.
Week 8 Monday (4 May 2026)
Mark and feedback will be returned in two (2) weeks from the submission date for all on-time submissions.
Assessment 1 – Marking Criteria: Group Report and Presentation
Your assessment will be evaluated based on the extent to which it meets the following criteria. Marks are awarded across both the written report and the recorded PowerPoint presentation, where relevant.
Group Registration and Compliance (5%)
- Group registration completed correctly and submitted via Moodle by the required deadline.
Knowledge and Application of Training Needs Assessment (20%)
- Demonstrated understanding of Training Needs Assessment concepts, processes, and frameworks.
Effective application of needs assessment theory to the selected organisational context.
Evidence of critical analysis in identifying and explaining the training or development gap.
Critical Engagement with Academic Literature (20%)
- Critical review and integration of relevant academic literature related to Training Needs Assessment and training and development interventions.
Literature is used to support analysis, justification of methods, and recommendations rather than described in isolation.
Use of Academic Sources (10%)
- Appropriate selection and accurate use of recent, relevant peer-reviewed academic sources.
A minimum of six (6) scholarly references is required to achieve a pass for this criterion.
Sources are integrated effectively into both the report and presentation.
Referencing (5%)
- Correct and consistent use of the CQU APA 7 referencing style for in-text citations and reference lists.
Appropriate referencing is demonstrated in both the written report and the PowerPoint presentation.
Written Report Presentation (5%)
- Clear and logical structure consistent with a professional business report format.
Clarity of expression and appropriate academic language.
Correct grammar, punctuation, and Australian English spelling.
PowerPoint Presentation Quality (10%)
- Professional slide design and clear structure (introduction, body, conclusion).
Key content from the report is communicated effectively and appropriately for a senior management audience.
Slides support spoken content without excessive text.
Personal Presentation Skills (20%)
- Professional delivery suitable for a senior management audience.
Clear verbal communication, appropriate pacing, and engagement.
Effective speaker transitions and coordination between group members.
Group Work and Contribution (5%)
- Evidence of effective collaboration.
Completion and submission of the individual self-evaluation and contribution analysis.
- Demonstrate understanding of the concepts, principles and theories of training and development
- Synthesise concepts and theories covered in the unit to develop training and development interventions for practical workplace contexts.
2 Presentation
Purpose
This assessment develops students’ capability to design and deliver effective training in an applied workplace context. Students will demonstrate their understanding of training delivery principles by designing a structured training session and delivering a short, skills-based training video suitable for an online environment.
The task builds professional competencies in instructional design, communication, training delivery, and the practical application of training and development theory.
Description
This is an individual assessment. Students are required to design and deliver a short training session focused on teaching a specific skill that aligns with effective training delivery principles.
Students must first design a structured training session using the prescribed Session Plan Template, clearly defining the training objectives, target audience, session structure, delivery methods, and required resources. The session plan must demonstrate alignment with sound learning and training principles.
Students will then record a 7–10 minute training video in which they deliver the training session. The video should include a clear introduction, a structured and engaging demonstration of the skill, and a concise conclusion that reinforces key learning points. The training must be delivered professionally and be appropriate for an online training context.
The assessment consists of the following components:
- Training video demonstrating the delivery of a skills-based training session (7–10 minutes)
- Session plan completed using the prescribed template, including references
- YouTube link to the training video (uploaded as “Unlisted”)
The training video must be uploaded to YouTube prior to submission, and the link included in the submitted document.
This assessment is due Week 9, Monday, 11 May 2026, 11.45 pm AEST.
Detailed instructions, templates, and submission requirements are provided on Moodle and must be reviewed prior to commencing the assessment.
Late submission penalties apply in accordance with University policy.
Week 9 Monday (11 May 2026) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 11 Monday (25 May 2026)
Mark and feedback will be returned in two (2) weeks from submission date for all on-time submissions.
Assessment 2 – Assessment Criteria
Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria. The assessment is marked out of 100, with the final mark converted to 40% in accordance with the unit weighting.
Training Content (20%)
- Effectiveness of the training content in meeting the stated training purpose and learning objectives.
- Clarity, relevance, and appropriateness of the skill taught.
Training Delivery (20%)
- Appropriate use of training delivery concepts and techniques in relation to the content, audience, and context.
- Evidence of engagement, clarity, pacing, and effective communication.
- Creativity and innovation in delivery where appropriate.
Session Plan Quality (15%)
- Professional presentation and logical structure of the session plan.
- Inclusion of key elements such as objectives, audience, content flow, delivery methods, and resources.
Structure and Organisation (15%)
- Clear alignment between the session plan and the training video.
- Logical sequencing of content and consistency between planned and delivered training.
Presentation and Professionalism (20%)
- Professional standard of delivery, including clarity of speech, engagement, time management, and overall presentation quality.
- Appropriateness of tone and delivery for a workplace training audience.
Referencing and Use of Sources (10%)
- Appropriate use of academic and credible sources to support training design and delivery.
- Correct and consistent use of APA 7 referencing style.
- Demonstrate understanding of the concepts, principles and theories of training and development
- Assess the link between training and development and broader organisational issues and strategies
- Evaluate training and development needs in a practical workplace context, design appropriate interventions, and evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions
- Examine training and development opportunities and challenges in contemporary workplaces
- Synthesise concepts and theories covered in the unit to develop training and development interventions for practical workplace contexts.
3 Written Assessment
Purpose
This assessment develops students’ ability to analyse, design, and justify training and development interventions in a contemporary organisational context. Students will apply training and development theory to a practical workplace problem and communicate their recommendations through a professional business report prepared for a senior executive audience.
The task builds advanced skills in critical analysis, evidence-based decision-making, professional report writing, and the integration of theory with real-world organisational practice.
Description
This is an individual assessment. Students will assume the role of a Training and Development Specialist who has been asked to design and justify a structured induction program for a specific role within an organisation.
Students must select a real organisation and identify a specific role (or newly created position). The report should be written as a professional business document rather than a generic academic essay.
The assessment requires students to:
- establish a clear business case for a structured induction program, supported by academic literature
- analyse the challenges faced by new employees in the selected role, particularly during their first 90 days
- design a structured induction program that supports early performance, engagement, and organisational integration
- justify all design decisions using relevant training and development concepts, principles, and theories
Students will present a snapshot of their proposed solution as an Induction Program Overview and Implementation Plan covering the first 90 days of employment, included as Appendix A. The body of the report must clearly explain and justify the program design, explicitly linking theory to practice and to the organisational issues identified.
This assessment is submitted as a 2500-word business report (±10%) and is due Exam/Review Week, Monday, 8 June 2026, 11.45 pm AEST.
Detailed instructions, templates, and submission requirements are provided on Moodle and must be reviewed prior to commencing the assessment.
Late submission penalties apply in accordance with University policy.
Exam Week Monday (8 June 2026) 11:45 pm AEST
Vacation/Exam Week Friday (19 June 2026)
Assessments will be returned and marks released after grade certification.
Assessment 3 – Assessment Criteria
Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria. The assessment is marked out of 100, with the final mark converted to 45% in accordance with the unit weighting.
Critical Analysis of Induction and HRM Issues (35%)
- Depth of analysis and quality of argument related to induction and onboarding.
- Effective integration of academic literature to support analysis and recommendations.
Induction Program Design and Rationale (20%)
- Development of a structured induction program and implementation plan.
- Clear, evidence-based rationale for design decisions using training and development principles.
Use of Organisational Examples (10%)
- Appropriate use of real organisational context and examples to support analysis and recommendations.
- Clear connection between organisational context, identified issues, and proposed solutions.
Report Structure and Argument (10%)
- Logical organisation, clarity of argument, and inclusion of all required report sections.
- Coherent flow and clear alignment between analysis, design, and recommendations.
- Applies academic theories and concepts to support justification of design and implementation plan.
Use of Academic Sources and Referencing (15%)
- Quality, relevance, and integration of academic sources.
- Correct and consistent use of APA 7 referencing style.
Professionalism of Business Report (10%)
- Adherence to professional business report conventions.
- Clarity of expression, appropriate business tone, and correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
A minimum of ten (10) recent academic sources is required to achieve a passing grade. The report must follow the prescribed business report template provided on Moodle.
- Demonstrate understanding of the concepts, principles and theories of training and development
- Assess the link between training and development and broader organisational issues and strategies
- Evaluate training and development needs in a practical workplace context, design appropriate interventions, and evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions
- Examine training and development opportunities and challenges in contemporary workplaces
- Synthesise concepts and theories covered in the unit to develop training and development interventions for practical workplace contexts.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?