CQUniversity Unit Profile
EDSE20015 Neuroeducation and Assessment
Neuroeducation and Assessment
All details in this unit profile for EDSE20015 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student).
The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.
General Information

Overview

In secondary education, assessment is crucial, with preservice teachers needing to understand how the brain learns and its implications for assessment. This unit encompasses brain information flow, assessment strategies, valid and reliable judgments, moderation, feedback, reporting and utilising assessment data to inform teaching. It underscores evidence-based research in assessment and neuroscience to enhance your practice and maximise student achievement and well-being.

Details

Career Level: Postgraduate
Unit Level: Level 9
Credit Points: 6
Student Contribution Band: 7
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load: 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

There are no requisites for this unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Offerings For Term 3 - 2025

Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Class and Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Bundaberg, Cairns, Emerald, Gladstone, Mackay, Rockhampton, Townsville
Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney

Assessment Overview

1. Online Quiz(zes)
Weighting: 10%
2. Project (applied)
Weighting: 40%
3. Project (applied)
Weighting: 50%

Assessment Grading

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.

Previous Student Feedback

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback from Lecturer and student discussions and email.

Feedback

More concise Moodle resources

Recommendation

Streamline and simplify Moodle resources to enhance accessibility and ease of use.

Feedback from Lecturer and student discussions and email.

Feedback

Assessment

Recommendation

Clarify assessment requirements, including the marking criteria and guidelines.

Unit Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience
  2. Synthesise high-quality assessment principles, student feedback, reporting and moderation processes to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning informed by neuroscience
  3. Elaborate on how to use student assessment data to identify student interventions and modify teaching practice
  4. Integrate the knowledge of novice vs expert learners, brain learning and retention processes, mastery progression, and neuromyths to inform and adapt educational practices effectively.

Successful completion of this unit provides opportunities for students to demonstrate the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers focus areas of:

1.2 Understand how students learn

5.1 Assess student learning

5.2 Provide feedback to students on their learning

5.3 Make consistent and comparable judgements

5.4 Interpret student data

5.5 Report on student achievement

 

Successful completion of this unit also provides opportunities for students to engage with the following Learning Outcomes from the AITSL Core Content 1 – The Brain and Learning:

1.1 Knowledge of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’. Knowledge of and skill in the related implications for practice. 

1.2 Knowledge of the most efficient and effective process of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload. 

1.3 Knowledge of the process that occurs in a novice brain during progression towards mastery. Knowledge of and skill in the need to adjust practice in response. 

1.4 Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation. 

 

Alignment of Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Graduate Attributes
N/A Level
Introductory Level
Intermediate Level
Graduate Level
Professional Level
Advanced Level

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Project (applied) - 40%
2 - Project (applied) - 50%
3 - Online Quiz(zes) - 10%

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Knowledge
2 - Communication
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4 - Research
5 - Self-management
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility
7 - Leadership
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures
Textbooks and Resources

Textbooks

There are no required textbooks.

Additional Textbook Information

Modules in Moodle and McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design Meets Neuroscience. Preview pages at https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Upgrade_Your_Teaching.html?id=42mRDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
Referencing Style

All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)

For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.

Teaching Contacts
Dan Petersen Unit Coordinator
d.j.petersen@cqu.edu.au
Ken Purnell Unit Coordinator
k.purnell@cqu.edu.au
Schedule
Week 1 Begin Date: 10 Nov 2025

Module/Topic

Module 1: The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:

Topic A - What is Neuroplasticity?

Topic B - Information Flow in the Brain

Topic C - Valuable Ideas for your Teaching Using Neuroplasticity

 

Chapter

Our Unit textbook by McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Introduction & Chapter 1

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 2 Begin Date: 17 Nov 2025

Module/Topic

Module 1 - The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:

Topic D - Science of Learning and Top 10 Achievement Boosters

Topic E - Worked Examples and Scaffolding

 

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Chapter 2

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 3 Begin Date: 24 Nov 2025

Module/Topic

Module 1 - The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:

Topic F - The Adolescent Brain - Under Construction

Topic G - Stress - Distress and Eustress + Resilience

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Chapter 3

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 4 Begin Date: 01 Dec 2025

Module/Topic

Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:

Part A 

Topic A - Cognitive Load

Topic B - Understanding the Differences Between Novices and Experts

Topic C - Memory: An Overview for Teachers

Topic D - Brain Conditions for Learning

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Chapter 2

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Task 1: The Social Brain Digital Badge Due: Week 4 Monday (1 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 5 Begin Date: 08 Dec 2025

Module/Topic

Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:

Part A 

Topic E - Techniques to Help Memory

Topic F - Sleep & Memory

Topic G - Inviting Classrooms (2 Mins)

Topic H - Why Brain Uniqueness Matters in Teaching

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Chapter 5

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Task 2: The Brain and Learning: implications for teaching Due: Week 5 Friday (12 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 6 Begin Date: 15 Dec 2025

Module/Topic

Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:

Part B

Topic A - What are Neuromyths?

Topic B - Impact of Neuromyths on Teaching

Topic C - Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies

Topic D - Teaching with the Brain in Mind: A Multisensory Approach to Learning

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

Chapter 6

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 22 Dec 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Vacation Week Begin Date: 29 Dec 2025

Module/Topic

Chapter

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 7 Begin Date: 05 Jan 2026

Module/Topic

Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:

Topic A - Assess student learning - including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches

Topic B - Feedback and reporting to students and parents/carers - including the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

All chapters

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 8 Begin Date: 12 Jan 2026

Module/Topic

Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:

Topic C - Moderation - Make consistent and comparable judgements

Topic D - Interpret and use student data

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

All chapters

Events and Submissions/Topic

Week 9 Begin Date: 19 Jan 2026

Module/Topic

Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:

Topic E - Reporting

Chapter

McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.

Pages are available here.

All chapters

Events and Submissions/Topic

Assessment Task 3: Assessing Student Learning Teacher Resource Due: Week 9 Friday (23 Jan 2026) 11:45 pm AEST
Assessment Tasks

1 Online Quiz(zes)

Assessment Title
Assessment Task 1: The Social Brain Digital Badge

Task Description

Complete “The Social Brain” micro-credential and quiz to build your understanding of how social and emotional factors influence student learning. To pass, you’ll need to score at least 16 out of 20 on the quiz to earn the official CQU Digital Badge (20 hours). You are allowed multiple attempts to achieve at least 16 correct.

The Social Brain short course and quiz are available here.    

The microcredential is assessed using an on-line quiz with the students requiring answering a range of questions that relate to the brain and learning, specifically: 

  • novice vs expert learners;
  • how the brain learns, retains and masters information;
  • mental modes and schemas;
  • features of biologically primary vs. biologically secondary knowledge acquisition and the importance of teacher-led instruction for secondary knowledge acquisition;
  • how a learner’s brain develops from early childhood through to young adult,, including the development of executive functions and the implications for teaching; 
  • research evidence that shows why the use of self-directed approaches as a starting point for novices is ineffective and should be avoided;
  • how the brain moves information through working memory into long-term memory, how to optimise this process and the potential barriers to this process;
  • the limits of working memory including how cognitive overload occurs, and the common causes of cognitive overload;
  • the most effective teaching practices to reduce cognitive overload including explicit instruction, scaffolding, and clearly structured content that connects new information to prior learning;
  • how the brain applies attained knowledge to solve problems by accessing memory or combining and re-combining memory to generate possible solutions;
  • why teaching practices must adapt as a student’s familiarity with the knowledge of a subject increases, including when to move from scaffolded practice to independent practice, and why this is important;
  • the use of worked examples and strategies for engagement. How to progressively increase the complexity of tasks, including examples of how to transition from basic worked examples to more challenging problem-solving activities as students become more familiar with the subject matter is addressed;
  • the negative impacts of pedagogical choices based on neuromyths.


Number of Quizzes

1


Frequency of Quizzes

Other


Assessment Due Date

Week 4 Monday (1 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 5 Monday (8 Dec 2025)

Marked online.


Weighting
10%

Assessment Criteria

The quiz has 20 items from a bank of items, and you are allowed multiple attempts to do the quiz. Once you achieve 16 items correct or more out of 20, you are eligible for the CQU Professional Development Certificate of 20 hours that is produced electronically for you in The Social Brain short course. 

In completing this task, you will demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the following: 

  • Core Content Criteria 1: Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity - Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.
  • Core Content Criteria 2: How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information - Applied understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload including explicit instruction, scaffolding, and clearly structured content that connects new information to prior learning.
  • Core Content Criteria 3: Neuromyths - Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation 

AI Assessment Scale: Level 1

You must not use AI at any point during this assessment. You must demonstrate your core skills and knowledge. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding the use of AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

 


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Upload PDF of your digital badge with your name on it in our unit's Moodle website for ATI.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience

2 Project (applied)

Assessment Title
Assessment Task 2: The Brain and Learning: implications for teaching

Task Description

Create an engaging, evidence-informed teacher resource (approximately 2,200 words) that explains key concepts about the brain and learning, with a clear focus on how this knowledge can be applied in diverse Australian classrooms. Your resource must demonstrate your ability to translate neuroscience insights into practical teaching strategies that support student learning and related implications for practice. Draw upon your own classroom experience by substantiating your research and learning with practical examples from the classroom. 

Your response should be presented using the following structure and prompts:  

1. Introduction

Your personal position on why understanding neuroeducation is important to teachers.  

2. Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity

 Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.

3. How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information

Understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload.

4. Neuromyths

Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their continued use.

5. Conclusion

What are the broader implications for teaching practice.

6. References

Additionally, your response should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (APST 1.2) and include examples of how you set learning goals that provide achievable challenges for students of varying abilities and characteristics (APST 3.1).

Your response should draw on examples of a range of verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to support student engagement (APST 3.5).


Assessment Due Date

Week 5 Friday (12 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Vacation Week Monday (22 Dec 2025)


Weighting
40%

Assessment Criteria

Task Completion - The main requirements of the task are addressed, demonstrating an understanding of the subject matter.

Understanding and application of the core content related to the Brain and Learning:

  • Core Content Criteria 1: Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.
  • Core Content Criteria 2: How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information - Applied understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload
  • Core Content Criteria 3: Neuromyths - Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation

Communication of Ideas - The response evidences an understanding of the topic, ideas are communicated, structure of the response and use of grammar and syntax.

Continuity and Flow - The response is organised using flow and continuity.

Audience Engagement – The response shows an understanding of audience needs with engagement techniques through the writing.

Writing Style and referencing - The response demonstrates an understanding of the style with the use of in-text citations and references. 

Word Count:
The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations.  Word count for this assignment: 2200 words maximum.

AI Assessment Scale: Level 3
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining, and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit your Word document via the Assessment Task 2 submission link on Moodle.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Integrate the knowledge of novice vs expert learners, brain learning and retention processes, mastery progression, and neuromyths to inform and adapt educational practices effectively.

3 Project (applied)

Assessment Title
Assessment Task 3: Assessing Student Learning Teacher Resource

Task Description

Create a clear and practical teacher resource (approx. 2,500 words) on how to assess student learning.

Ensure you provide evidence in your resource in the following sections:

1. Assessing Student Learning

Define and give examples of informal and formal assessment methods

State the purposes of diagnostic, formative, and summative approaches

Consider how to use a range of evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate progress, adjust instruction, provide targeted feedback, and support learning.

2. Providing Feedback

Describe why timely, constructive feedback is critical for student learning

3.   Making Judgements

Outline moderation processes that support consistent and fair assessment

4.   Interpreting Student Data

Discuss how to use data to inform and adjust your teaching

5.   Reporting on Achievement

Describe strategies for reporting student progress to students and parents

Highlight the importance of accurate assessment records

Ensure that you provide evidence in your response that:

  • Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (AITSL 1.2)
  • Demonstrates understanding of assessment strategies, including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning (AITSL 5.1)
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of providing timely and appropriate feedback to students about their learning (AITSL 5.2)
  • Demonstrates understanding of assessment moderation and its application to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning (AITSL 5.3)
  • Demonstrates the capacity to interpret student assessment data to evaluate student learning and modify teaching practice (AITSL, 5.4)
  • Demonstrates understanding of a range of strategies for reporting to students and parents/carers and the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement (AITSL 5.5)

 


Assessment Due Date

Week 9 Friday (23 Jan 2026) 11:45 pm AEST


Return Date to Students

Week 12 Monday (9 Feb 2026)

Feedback in Moodle following moderation.


Weighting
50%

Assessment Criteria

Assessment will be marked against the following criteria:

Task Completion - The main requirements of the task are addressed, demonstrating an understanding of the subject matter.

Understanding and application of the APSTs related to Assessing Student Learning:

  • Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (AITSL 1.2)
  • Demonstrates understanding of assessment strategies, including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning (AITSL 5.1) and how to select a range of evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate progress, adjust instruction, provide targeted feedback, and support learning (Core Content 2.3)
  • Demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of providing timely and appropriate feedback to students about their learning (AITSL 5.2) 
  • Demonstrates understanding of assessment moderation and its application to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning (AITSL 5.3)
  • Demonstrates the capacity to interpret student assessment data to evaluate student learning and modify teaching practice (AITSL, 5.4)
  • Demonstrates understanding of a range of strategies for reporting to students and parents/carers and the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement (AITSL 5.5)

Communication of Ideas - The response evidences an understanding of the topic, ideas are communicated, structure of the response and use of grammar and syntax.

Continuity and Flow - The response is organised using flow and continuity.

Audience Engagement – The response shows an understanding of audience needs with engagement techniques through the writing.

Writing Style and referencing - The response demonstrates an understanding of the style with the use of in-text citations and references. 

Word Count:
The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations.  Word count for this assignment: 2500 words maximum.

AI Assessment Scale: Level 3
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining, and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.


Referencing Style

Submission
Online

Submission Instructions
Submit your Word document via the Assessment Task 3 submission link on Moodle.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience
  • Synthesise high-quality assessment principles, student feedback, reporting and moderation processes to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning informed by neuroscience
  • Elaborate on how to use student assessment data to identify student interventions and modify teaching practice

Academic Integrity Statement

As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.

Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.

When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.

Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.

As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.

What is a breach of academic integrity?

A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.

Why is academic integrity important?

A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.

Where can I get assistance?

For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.

What can you do to act with integrity?