Overview
In secondary education, assessment is crucial, with preservice teachers needing to understand how the brain learns and its implications for assessment. This unit encompasses brain information flow, assessment strategies, valid and reliable judgments, moderation, feedback, reporting and utilising assessment data to inform teaching. It underscores evidence-based research in assessment and neuroscience to enhance your practice and maximise student achievement and well-being.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 3 - 2025
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Lecturer and student discussions and email.
More concise Moodle resources
Streamline and simplify Moodle resources to enhance accessibility and ease of use.
Feedback from Lecturer and student discussions and email.
Assessment
Clarify assessment requirements, including the marking criteria and guidelines.
- Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience
- Synthesise high-quality assessment principles, student feedback, reporting and moderation processes to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning informed by neuroscience
- Elaborate on how to use student assessment data to identify student interventions and modify teaching practice
- Integrate the knowledge of novice vs expert learners, brain learning and retention processes, mastery progression, and neuromyths to inform and adapt educational practices effectively.
Successful completion of this unit provides opportunities for students to demonstrate the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers focus areas of:
1.2 Understand how students learn
5.1 Assess student learning
5.2 Provide feedback to students on their learning
5.3 Make consistent and comparable judgements
5.4 Interpret student data
5.5 Report on student achievement
Successful completion of this unit also provides opportunities for students to engage with the following Learning Outcomes from the AITSL Core Content 1 – The Brain and Learning:
1.1 Knowledge of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’. Knowledge of and skill in the related implications for practice.
1.2 Knowledge of the most efficient and effective process of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload.
1.3 Knowledge of the process that occurs in a novice brain during progression towards mastery. Knowledge of and skill in the need to adjust practice in response.
1.4 Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Project (applied) - 40% | ||||
| 2 - Project (applied) - 50% | ||||
| 3 - Online Quiz(zes) - 10% | ||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | ||||
| 2 - Communication | ||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||
| 4 - Research | ||||
| 5 - Self-management | ||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||
| 7 - Leadership | ||||
| 8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | ||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
Additional Textbook Information
Modules in Moodle and McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design Meets Neuroscience. Preview pages at https://books.google.com.au/books/about/Upgrade_Your_Teaching.html?id=42mRDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
d.j.petersen@cqu.edu.au
k.purnell@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Module 1: The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:
Topic A - What is Neuroplasticity?
Topic B - Information Flow in the Brain
Topic C - Valuable Ideas for your Teaching Using Neuroplasticity
Chapter
Our Unit textbook by McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Introduction & Chapter 1
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 1 - The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:
Topic D - Science of Learning and Top 10 Achievement Boosters
Topic E - Worked Examples and Scaffolding
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 1 - The Social Brain and Neuroplasticity:
Topic F - The Adolescent Brain - Under Construction
Topic G - Stress - Distress and Eustress + Resilience
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Chapter 3
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:
Part A
Topic A - Cognitive Load
Topic B - Understanding the Differences Between Novices and Experts
Topic C - Memory: An Overview for Teachers
Topic D - Brain Conditions for Learning
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:
Part A
Topic E - Techniques to Help Memory
Topic F - Sleep & Memory
Topic G - Inviting Classrooms (2 Mins)
Topic H - Why Brain Uniqueness Matters in Teaching
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Chapter 5
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 2 - Cognitive Load and Neuromyths:
Part B
Topic A - What are Neuromyths?
Topic B - Impact of Neuromyths on Teaching
Topic C - Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies
Topic D - Teaching with the Brain in Mind: A Multisensory Approach to Learning
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
Chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:
Topic A - Assess student learning - including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches
Topic B - Feedback and reporting to students and parents/carers - including the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
All chapters
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:
Topic C - Moderation - Make consistent and comparable judgements
Topic D - Interpret and use student data
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
All chapters
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Module 3 - Assessing Student Learning:
Topic E - Reporting
Chapter
McTighe & Willis (2019), Upgrade Your Teaching: Understanding by Design meets Neuroscience.
Pages are available here.
All chapters
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Online Quiz(zes)
Complete “The Social Brain” micro-credential and quiz to build your understanding of how social and emotional factors influence student learning. To pass, you’ll need to score at least 16 out of 20 on the quiz to earn the official CQU Digital Badge (20 hours). You are allowed multiple attempts to achieve at least 16 correct.
The Social Brain short course and quiz are available here.
The microcredential is assessed using an on-line quiz with the students requiring answering a range of questions that relate to the brain and learning, specifically:
- novice vs expert learners;
- how the brain learns, retains and masters information;
- mental modes and schemas;
- features of biologically primary vs. biologically secondary knowledge acquisition and the importance of teacher-led instruction for secondary knowledge acquisition;
- how a learner’s brain develops from early childhood through to young adult,, including the development of executive functions and the implications for teaching;
- research evidence that shows why the use of self-directed approaches as a starting point for novices is ineffective and should be avoided;
- how the brain moves information through working memory into long-term memory, how to optimise this process and the potential barriers to this process;
- the limits of working memory including how cognitive overload occurs, and the common causes of cognitive overload;
- the most effective teaching practices to reduce cognitive overload including explicit instruction, scaffolding, and clearly structured content that connects new information to prior learning;
- how the brain applies attained knowledge to solve problems by accessing memory or combining and re-combining memory to generate possible solutions;
- why teaching practices must adapt as a student’s familiarity with the knowledge of a subject increases, including when to move from scaffolded practice to independent practice, and why this is important;
- the use of worked examples and strategies for engagement. How to progressively increase the complexity of tasks, including examples of how to transition from basic worked examples to more challenging problem-solving activities as students become more familiar with the subject matter is addressed;
- the negative impacts of pedagogical choices based on neuromyths.
1
Other
Week 4 Monday (1 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 5 Monday (8 Dec 2025)
Marked online.
The quiz has 20 items from a bank of items, and you are allowed multiple attempts to do the quiz. Once you achieve 16 items correct or more out of 20, you are eligible for the CQU Professional Development Certificate of 20 hours that is produced electronically for you in The Social Brain short course.
In completing this task, you will demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the following:
- Core Content Criteria 1: Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity - Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.
- Core Content Criteria 2: How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information - Applied understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload including explicit instruction, scaffolding, and clearly structured content that connects new information to prior learning.
- Core Content Criteria 3: Neuromyths - Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation
AI Assessment Scale: Level 1
You must not use AI at any point during this assessment. You must demonstrate your core skills and knowledge. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding the use of AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.
- Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience
2 Project (applied)
Create an engaging, evidence-informed teacher resource (approximately 2,200 words) that explains key concepts about the brain and learning, with a clear focus on how this knowledge can be applied in diverse Australian classrooms. Your resource must demonstrate your ability to translate neuroscience insights into practical teaching strategies that support student learning and related implications for practice. Draw upon your own classroom experience by substantiating your research and learning with practical examples from the classroom.
Your response should be presented using the following structure and prompts:
1. Introduction
Your personal position on why understanding neuroeducation is important to teachers.
2. Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity
Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.
3. How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information
Understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload.
4. Neuromyths
Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their continued use.
5. Conclusion
What are the broader implications for teaching practice.
6. References
Additionally, your response should demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (APST 1.2) and include examples of how you set learning goals that provide achievable challenges for students of varying abilities and characteristics (APST 3.1).
Your response should draw on examples of a range of verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to support student engagement (APST 3.5).
Week 5 Friday (12 Dec 2025) 11:45 pm AEST
Vacation Week Monday (22 Dec 2025)
Task Completion - The main requirements of the task are addressed, demonstrating an understanding of the subject matter.
Understanding and application of the core content related to the Brain and Learning:
- Core Content Criteria 1: Novice vs. Expert Learners – Neuroplasticity Knowledge of and understanding of the related implications for practice of what it means to be a ‘novice’ learner in comparison to an ‘expert’ and the processes that occur during progression from novice towards mastery and how to adjust teaching practice in response.
- Core Content Criteria 2: How the Brain Learns, Retains, and Masters Information - Applied understanding of processes of knowledge acquisition in the brain, including the function of memory and the concept of cognitive overload
- Core Content Criteria 3: Neuromyths - Knowledge and understanding of common neuromyths and the impact of their perpetuation
Communication of Ideas - The response evidences an understanding of the topic, ideas are communicated, structure of the response and use of grammar and syntax.
Continuity and Flow - The response is organised using flow and continuity.
Audience Engagement – The response shows an understanding of audience needs with engagement techniques through the writing.
Writing Style and referencing - The response demonstrates an understanding of the style with the use of in-text citations and references.
Word Count:
The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations. Word count for this assignment: 2200 words maximum.
AI Assessment Scale: Level 3
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining, and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.
- Integrate the knowledge of novice vs expert learners, brain learning and retention processes, mastery progression, and neuromyths to inform and adapt educational practices effectively.
3 Project (applied)
Create a clear and practical teacher resource (approx. 2,500 words) on how to assess student learning.
Ensure you provide evidence in your resource in the following sections:
1. Assessing Student Learning
Define and give examples of informal and formal assessment methods
State the purposes of diagnostic, formative, and summative approaches
Consider how to use a range of evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate progress, adjust instruction, provide targeted feedback, and support learning.
2. Providing Feedback
Describe why timely, constructive feedback is critical for student learning
3. Making Judgements
Outline moderation processes that support consistent and fair assessment
4. Interpreting Student Data
Discuss how to use data to inform and adjust your teaching
5. Reporting on Achievement
Describe strategies for reporting student progress to students and parents
Highlight the importance of accurate assessment records
Ensure that you provide evidence in your response that:
- Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (AITSL 1.2)
- Demonstrates understanding of assessment strategies, including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning (AITSL 5.1)
- Demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of providing timely and appropriate feedback to students about their learning (AITSL 5.2)
- Demonstrates understanding of assessment moderation and its application to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning (AITSL 5.3)
- Demonstrates the capacity to interpret student assessment data to evaluate student learning and modify teaching practice (AITSL, 5.4)
- Demonstrates understanding of a range of strategies for reporting to students and parents/carers and the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement (AITSL 5.5)
Week 9 Friday (23 Jan 2026) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 12 Monday (9 Feb 2026)
Feedback in Moodle following moderation.
Assessment will be marked against the following criteria:
Task Completion - The main requirements of the task are addressed, demonstrating an understanding of the subject matter.
Understanding and application of the APSTs related to Assessing Student Learning:
- Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn and the implications for teaching (AITSL 1.2)
- Demonstrates understanding of assessment strategies, including informal and formal, diagnostic, formative and summative approaches to assess student learning (AITSL 5.1) and how to select a range of evidence-based assessment practices to evaluate progress, adjust instruction, provide targeted feedback, and support learning (Core Content 2.3)
- Demonstrates an understanding of the purpose of providing timely and appropriate feedback to students about their learning (AITSL 5.2)
- Demonstrates understanding of assessment moderation and its application to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning (AITSL 5.3)
- Demonstrates the capacity to interpret student assessment data to evaluate student learning and modify teaching practice (AITSL, 5.4)
- Demonstrates understanding of a range of strategies for reporting to students and parents/carers and the purpose of keeping accurate and reliable records of student achievement (AITSL 5.5)
Communication of Ideas - The response evidences an understanding of the topic, ideas are communicated, structure of the response and use of grammar and syntax.
Continuity and Flow - The response is organised using flow and continuity.
Audience Engagement – The response shows an understanding of audience needs with engagement techniques through the writing.
Writing Style and referencing - The response demonstrates an understanding of the style with the use of in-text citations and references.
Word Count:
The word count is considered from the first word of the introduction to the last word of the conclusion. It excludes the cover page, abstract, contents page, reference page and appendices. It includes in-text references and direct quotations. Word count for this assignment: 2500 words maximum.
AI Assessment Scale: Level 3
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining, and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.
- Comprehend how to develop, select and use assessment strategies to assess student learning informed by neuroscience
- Synthesise high-quality assessment principles, student feedback, reporting and moderation processes to support consistent and comparable judgements of student learning informed by neuroscience
- Elaborate on how to use student assessment data to identify student interventions and modify teaching practice
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?