Overview
In this unit you will develop an understanding of both the content and pedagogy required to teach science in early childhood education and care settings and in primary school classrooms. You are introduced to concepts on how children learn science, the importance of science education in an Australian and international context and current views regarding effective pedagogical practice. You will examine research that has informed the selection of pedagogy with children in early childhood education and care settings and in primary school classrooms. Practical application of skills related to the Australian Curriculum: Science will focus on learning and teaching across the four Understanding Substrands of Biological Sciences, Earth and Space Sciences, Chemical Sciences and Physical Sciences. There is an emphasis on science inquiry skills, in particular, identifying and posing questions; planning, conducting and reflecting on investigations; processing, analysing and interpreting evidence; and communicating findings. The unit includes an emphasis on effective student engagement within science education through the appropriate selection, application and assessment of science content knowledge.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2024
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from New Australian Curriculum
V9 ACARA Curriculum
Moodle site will be updated where appropriate to reflect new curriculum.
- Evaluate examples of teaching and assessment practice in science education to identify how connections are made to students’ prior knowledge or experience to promote learning
- Access and apply professional literature on contemporary science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
- Plan learning experiences that use appropriate research-based pedagogy and ICTs to structure content and address students’ possible misconceptions in science education
- Develop diagnostic, formative and summative assessment tools that identify students’ understanding of scientific phenomena
- Select teaching and learning and assessment strategies that draw on understandings from research of how students learn in order to support active learning, promote higher order thinking and scaffold students’ understanding of core concepts in science
- Identify strategies to support inclusive student participation and engagement in classroom activities.
Successful completion of this course provides opportunities for students to demonstrate the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers focus areas of:
1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students.
1.2 Understand how learners learn
2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area
2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting
2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs
3.3 Use teaching strategies
3.4 Select and use resources
3.6 Evaluate and improve teaching programs
4.1 Support student participation
5.1 Assess student learning
5.5 Report on student achievement
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 50% | ||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 50% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
1 - Knowledge | ||||||
2 - Communication | ||||||
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | ||||||
4 - Research | ||||||
5 - Self-management | ||||||
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | ||||||
7 - Leadership | ||||||
8 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Textbooks
Science in early childhood
Edition: 5th (2024)
Authors: Coral Campbell & Christine Howitt
Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9781009339742
Binding: Paperback
Teaching Primary Science Constructively
Edition: 7th (2021)
Authors: Kieth Scamp and Christene Preston
Cengage
ISBN: 9780170443401
Binding: Paperback
Additional Textbook Information
Campbell and Howitt "Science in Early Childhood" is our textbook for EC and primary students. It's a beginner's textbook that will set you up with everything you need to know about teaching science in schools and EC setting.
Skamp and Preston "Teaching primary science constructively" is supplementary, as an international standard for science educators. It will likely serve you well your entire career.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.ireland@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Theoretical Frameworks in Science and Science Education
Chapter
Required:
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER 1 & 4
(All students should familiarise themselves with the contents of the textbook at the start of this course)
Highly Recommended:
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTERS 1 and 2
Recommended:
Fragkiadaki, G., Fleer, M., & Rai, P. (2021). Early childhood science education from 0 to 6: A literature review. Education Sciences, 11, 178.
Addey, C., & Gorur, R. (2020). Translating PISA, translating the world. Comparative Education, 56(4).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Scientific Inquiry, the Curriculum, and Play-Based Learning
Chapter
Required
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. Chapter 2-3
Required to be reviewed
The Australian National Curriculum. - (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2022. v9) https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/ )
Department of Education and Training. (2019, March 6). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Department of Education. The Early Years Learning Framework - Department of Education, Australian Government
Highly Recommended
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER 9 – Science learning though play
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTER 4 – Thinking and working scientifically
Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Styliandou, F. (2015). Creative little scientists: Exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in Early Years science. Education 43(4), 404–419.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Scientific Language and Literacy
Chapter
Required
Hintz, A., Smith, A., Glen, K., Gannon, E., & Wishart, A. (2020). Story Time STEM: Nurturing children's joy and wonder through shared reading experiences. NAEYC.
Recommended
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER 6 – Inquiry Science for young children
Tomas, L. (2012). Writing narratives about a socioscientific issue: Engaging students and learning science. Teaching Science, 58(4), 24-28.
Vardell, S., & Wong, J. (2017). Learning about trees with the 5Es: The poetry of science building literacy in playful, meaningful ways. Science and children, 55(4), 20.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Science as a Human Endeavour
Chapter
Required
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER 5 – Approaches to enchance science learning
Recommended
Gomes, J., & Fleer, M. (2020). Is science really everywhere? Teachers’ perspectives on science learning possibilities in the preschool environment. Research in Science Education, 50, 1961–1989.
Hackling, M., Peers, S., & Prain, V. (2007). Primary Connections: reforming science teaching in Australian primary schools. Teaching science, 53(3).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
STEM and STEAM - Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics
Chapter
Required
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTER 11 STEM in early childhood
Recommended
Simoncini, K.,& Lasen, M. (2021). Popup loose parts playgrounds: learning opportunities for early childhood preservice teachers. International journal of play, 10(1).
Bucher, E., & Pindra, S. (2020). Infant and Toddler STEAM: Supporting Interdisciplinary Experiences with Our Youngest Learners. NAEYC, 75(2).
Erduran, S. (2020). Nature of "STEM"? Epistemic Underpinnings of Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in Education. Science & Education, 29(4).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Digital Literacy & Inclusivity
Chapter
Required
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTERS 7 (inclusivity) – 8 (indigenous ways of knowing)
Recommended
Pigott, C. (2013). Embedding Indigenous perspectives in science. Educating Young Children Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 19(1), 8-9.
Ng, Wan. (2011). Why digital literacy is important for science teaching and learning? Teaching Science, 57(4), 26-32.
Mantilla, A., & Edwards, S. (2019). Digital technology use by and with young children : A systematic review for the statement on young children and digital technologies. Australasian journal of early childhood, 44(2).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assignment 1
Assessment 1 - The Inquiry Experience Due: Week 6 Thursday (18 Apr 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
The Australian Curriculum (revisited), and Scientific Misconceptions
Chapter
Required
Elliott, K., & Pillman, A. (2016). Making science misconceptions work for us. Teaching Science, 62(1), 38-41.
Recommended
Kambouri, M. (2016). Investigating early years teachers' understanding and response to children's preconceptions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(6), 907-927.
Bonus, J., & Mares, M. (2018) When the Sun Sings Science, Are Children Left in the Dark? Representations of Science in Children’s Television and Their Effects on Children’s Learning. Human Communications Research, 44(4).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Assessment in Science
Chapter
Required
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTERS 16.
Recommended
Gregson and Doidge (2018), “Connecting with Science Education”, (Ed.2) has an entire chapter decided to assessment strategies (ch. 8)
Campbell, C., & Howitt, C. (2024). Science in early childhood (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press. CHAPTERS 14-15 & 16. (especially good for early childhood teachers)
Agboola, O., & Awogbindin, O. (2017). Assessment of science process skills inherent in the play activities of primary school pupils in Osun state, Nigeria. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 10(2), 125-135.
Hondrich, A., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353-376.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chemical Sciences
Chapter
Required
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTERS 10 and 11.
Recommended
Ashbrook, P. (2008). Exploring the properties of a mixture (The Early Years: Resources and conversations on PreK to 2 science). Science and Children, 45(5).
Chemical Sciences Taylor, N., Taylor, S., Rizk, N., & Cooper, G. (2017). Suggestions for teaching floating, sinking and density. Teaching science, 64(4).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Physical Sciences
Chapter
Required
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTERS 5, 6 and 7.
Recommended
Fridberg, M., Jonsson, A., Redfors, A., & Thulin, S. (2020). The Role of Intermediary Objects of Learning in Early Years Chemistry and Physics. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(5), 585-595.
Johnson, C., Walton, J., & PetersBurton, E. (2019). Physics in Motion, Kindergarten. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Biological Sciences
Chapter
Required
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTERS 8 and 9.
Recommended
Connor, C., Watkins, M., Walte, B., & Harper, J. (2020). Food for thought: Bringing primary school microbiology to life. Teaching Science, 66(1).
Gurholt, K., & Sanderud, J. (2016). Curious play: children's exploration of nature. Journal of adventure education and outdoor learning, 16(4).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Earth and Space Sciences
Chapter
Required
Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (2021). Teaching primary science constructively. Cengage. CHAPTERS 12, 13 and 14.
Recommended
Melis, C., Wold, P., Billing, A., Bjørgen, K., & Børge M. (2020). Kindergarten Children’s Perception about the Ecological Roles of Living Organisms. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 12(9565), 9565.
Spiteri, J . (2021). Can you hear me? Young children's understanding of environmental issues. International studies in sociology of education, 30(1-2).
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assignment 2
Scientific Concepts, Diagnostic Assessments, and Misconceptions Due: Week 12 Thursday (30 May 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Task Description
Inquiry is foundational for children’s learning in science and begins with young children as they play and interact with others within their everyday environment. From a very early age and as part of everyday experiences such as playing in the sandpit, pouring water into a cup or poking things with a stick, children engage in experiences that build scientific understandings. While children are naturally interested in phenomena in their world, adults support this inquiry as they pose questions and support children to make predictions (DEEWR, 2009).
As articulated in The Australian Curriculum (AC)v.9; “Science investigations are activities in which ideas, predictions or hypotheses are tested and conclusions are drawn in response to a question or problem. They can involve a range of activities including experimental testing, field work, locating and using information sources, conducting surveys, and using modelling and simulations. The choice of the approach taken will depend on the context and aims of the investigation.”
As articulated in the Early years Learning Framework (EYLF) outcome 4; children are confident and involved learners which is evident when children: are curious and enthusiastic participants in their learning; and use play to investigate, imagine and explore ideas.
In this assessment task, you will design one inquiry experience for children. There is no requirement for the inquiry experience to take place in a single lesson/day, as genuine inquiries may be take much longer. It is expected that this experience will be at a standard suitable for use on placement.
For early childhood students:
You will do one for either; babies, toddlers, pre-kindergarten, or Grade F – 2.
Primary students:
You will do one for either; Grade F-2, Grades 3-4 or Grades 5-6.
You may like to proceed as follows:
1. Select a concept for investigation (you will draw on the Australian Curriculum and / or the EYLF as appropriate for advice on suitable scientific concepts).
2. Research this concept so that you build your personal understanding of this concept. This understanding will help to inform the design of your inquiry. You will be required to synthesise this research and submit it as part of the assignment task. This will be used as a preface for your documentation (background research). It is a component that another person could read to inform the teaching of that particular concept.
3. Drawing on your understanding of children, including their interests, design an inquiry for children that uses inquiry methods to help students engage with the selected scientific concept. It is anticipated that the inquiry will comprise a number of learning experiences (minimum of 3) and will address the process in the Australian Curriculum and / or EYLF. The first experience is often an engagement in the concept, the second one could be a scientific investigation (a fair test) or observations, and the third one may be an application and discussing their understanding of the new concept with others.
It is important that you make use of the stages of Inquiry as described by the Australian Curriculum V9;
a) Questioning and predicting: Consider how to introduce the inquiry – So, what will be the stimulus? How will you get children interested? Given the importance of generating questions to support children’s inquiry, as part of your planning, you need to generate questions that might support the inquiry process. Plan to use student questions to guide student explanations and hypothesis - i.e., theories. Students may use those theories to make predictions about the world.
b) Planning: Identify how you will help then children plan for and conduct their inquiry. Will you provide measuring tools or specific experiences? You will need to ensure that this aligns with how this is explained in the sequence of the Australian Curriculum and / or EYLF. Plan to test student predictions about the world, as based on their current explanations.
c) Processing and analysing data and information: Consider how the children will process and analyse any data. For example, will they record the data in a simple table? How will you collect their observations? What guiding questions might you ask? Prepare to have students make evidence-based conclusions on the results of their experiments.
d) Comparing: Consider how children might compare their data with others. Consider how to scaffold students in making their scientific research a point of comparison and consideration among themselves, much like real scientists must do.
e) Communicating: Consider how children will communicate their findings, to each other, yourself, their parents, and perhaps the wider community.
4. Next, explicitly consider strategies to support inclusive student participation and engagement, for example physical disability or impairment, learning difficulties, learning styles, culture, gender, and gifted and talented students. Helping one disadvantaged community inevitably helps all learners.
5. As part of a critical appraisal, provide a conclusion and justification on how this approach to learning and teaching could make a positive impact on the learners.
Note
- In writing up your assignment, it is highly recommended that you follow the outline just above, however, be sure to answer all the criteria on the marking sheet, and to use subheadings to help direct marker's attention.
- You are not required to submit either an entire lesson plan, though it may help contextualise your unit of work. It is considered that submitting an entire unit of work is excessive, though it may be placed in your appendix so as not to count in the word count, however, markers will not be required to read it. But if it is helpful to you in your thinking, embrace the challenge.
- There is NO requirement to test this out on actual children first. However, such is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED (pictures really do help, and it is often quite obvious who has actually tested their inquiry on other minds first, and who is merely conjecturing from theoretical standpoint.)
There is a 2000 word limit maximum for this assignment, not including cover page, references, bibliography, footnotes, or appendixes
Week 6 Thursday (18 Apr 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 8 Thursday (2 May 2024)
Synthesis of selected concept drawn from evidence-based research and application of knowledge of the concept tothe design of the inquiry.
Evidence of knowledge of ways children learn in the design of the inquiry.
Identification of strategies to support inclusive student participation.
Evidence of awareness of Science as a Human Endeavour, and pedagogical practices that support student development of this key strand.
Explicit engagement techniques employed for introducing the inquiry.
Clear plans for encouraging, and employing, student lead questions as part of the inquiry teaching plan.
Clear and coherent learning experiences presented, including application of the scientific content.
Design of learning experiences explicitly linked to the Australian Curriculum and /or EYLF process of inquiry.
Effective use of the essential practices of scientific inquiry used, including; Questioning and predicting, Planning and conducting, Processing and analysing data and information, Evaluating and Communicating results.
As part of a critical appraisal, provide a conclusion and justification on how this approach to learning and teaching could make a positive impact on the learners
Effective, scholarly and professional communication in accordance with accepted academic conventions APA 7th.
- Access and apply professional literature on contemporary science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
- Select teaching and learning and assessment strategies that draw on understandings from research of how students learn in order to support active learning, promote higher order thinking and scaffold students’ understanding of core concepts in science
- Identify strategies to support inclusive student participation and engagement in classroom activities.
2 Written Assessment
TASK DESCRIPTION
Children have alternate conceptions or misconceptions about the scientific world. As children think about what they do and see, they build understandings of how objects and events work. Also contributing to the development of understandings about the scientific world are the interactions that children have with others, including other children and adults. The building of these ideas can often result in misconceptions about how the world works, including about scientific concepts. This assignment might best be approached in three parts;
Part A: Through research, select a scientific concept taught in one of the Understanding strands of the Australian Curriculum. This cannot be the same concept chosen in Assessment Task 1 and must be from a different Science Understanding strand than selected in Assessment Task 1 if applicable. Unfortunately, science concepts are often misunderstood or poorly understood. You will receive support to identify common misconceptions. Misconceptions can often be found in the media or during conversations with children.
Identify a learner context you will be working within: Either Foundation to Year 2 or Year 3 to Year 6. Note: early childhood students MUST select F-2, primary students can choose either F-2 OR 3-6. Identify the Year level and the science concept from the appropriate curriculum.
Identify previous interactions that may have contributed to the possible misconception. This might include explanations to questions or sayings that we commonly use. For example, adults may tell children that the sun has gone to bed. Using the Australian Curriculum (and where appropriate, the Early Years Learning Framework), identify the prior knowledge of the two years prior that children have developed or should have developed. The table below explains this in more detail.
Chosen Curriculum Selection of previous years to investigate prior knowledge
Foundation EYLF
Year 1 You would examine the EYLF and Foundation
Year 2 Foundation and Year 1
Year 3 Years 1 and 2
Year 4 Years 2 and 3
Year 5 Years 3 and 4
Year 6 Years 4 and 5
Design a diagnostic tool to critically analyse the understanding that these learners have about your selected concept. Included in your tool will be questions that enable you to find out about children’s understanding. As part of developing the questions, you will need to consider the concept.
This concept needs to be researched and this research submitted as part of your assessment task. What does the concept mean? Where might the children use this concept? How will children show you what they understand about the concept?
The diagnostic tool simply means ‘how will you find out’ about children’s understanding of the particular concept. While you are asked to use questions as part of your investigation, it may involve observing children engage with a particular concept insitu. Therefore, as part of your planning consider what children might be doing to show you that they understand the concept. Additionally, it may involve the collection of drawing, classwork or even overhearing children’s discussions. Think carefully about the artefacts that might be used to obtain information about the knowledge children have about the concept.
Part B Challenging Misconception: Drawing on the Australian Curriculum, develop a learning sequence that works to correct the possible misconception that you have examined in Part A.
The pedagogy used in your learning sequence must be linked to current research on effective teaching and learning practice. Additionally, the way you approach your planning needs to align with what you know about the cognitive and language characteristics of the learners in the chosen age group. You need to articulate how the sequence of learning evidences knowledge of research on how children learn in order to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students and how these may affect learning.
As part of the learning sequence, use ICTs to support children’s concept development. You need to include a range of teaching strategies that reflect the pedagogical approach to support concept development in science.
Part C: Communicating what you have identified about the misconceptions. This section of the assignment requires that you outline how you would report your findings to children/students and parents/carers.
There is a 2000 word limit maximum for this assignment, not including cover page, references, bibliography, footnotes, or appendixes.
Week 12 Thursday (30 May 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Exam Week Thursday (13 June 2024)
Explicit identification and thorough research of a scientific concept.
Explicit identification and thorough research of learner context and curriculum level.
Comprehensive diagnostic assessment tool developed to analyse the understandings that learners may have about the selected concept.
Deep knowledge and understanding of the correct scientific concept.
Explicit connections between the misconception and the current scientific concept, and how the misconception can be helpful in empowering students to create more developed understandings
Development of a learning sequence based on contemporary research on effective learning and teaching practice including appropriate use of ICTs to support the development of the accepted scientific concept.
Articulation of how the learning sequence demonstrates knowledge and understanding of research into how students learn.
Discussion on the physical, social, and intellectual development and characteristics of students, and the implications for learning and teaching.
Articulation about how learning outcomes might be communicated with stakeholders.
Effective, scholarly and professional communication in accordance with accepted academic conventions APA 7th.
- Evaluate examples of teaching and assessment practice in science education to identify how connections are made to students’ prior knowledge or experience to promote learning
- Access and apply professional literature on contemporary science education to critically evaluate or justify planning and assessment practices
- Plan learning experiences that use appropriate research-based pedagogy and ICTs to structure content and address students’ possible misconceptions in science education
- Develop diagnostic, formative and summative assessment tools that identify students’ understanding of scientific phenomena
- Select teaching and learning and assessment strategies that draw on understandings from research of how students learn in order to support active learning, promote higher order thinking and scaffold students’ understanding of core concepts in science
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.