Overview
Resource use and environmental issues are difficult for society to evaluate and balance. You will be introduced to some of the most important economic concepts that relate to environmental issues, and provide a framework for evaluating policy choices. Among the topics you will cover are project and policy assessment tools, environmental valuation and accounting methods, and the efficiency of different institutions and mechanisms that guide environmental choices.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Prerequisite: Minimum of 24 Units
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2024
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Self-reflection
Continue to update learning materials
It is recommended that the Unit Coordinator continue to update lecture material and learning resources to reflect contemporary policy issues covered in the Unit.
- identify how market mechanisms work to allocate resources, and how markets and ecological mechanisms can be viewed in a systems approach
- demonstrate that many environmental problems arise because of market failure and government failure problems, leading to inadequate signalling and incentive mechanisms used in society to allocate resources
- identify different approaches to evaluating environmental issues
- understand how valuation of environmental impacts can allow more accurate assessment of environmental issues
- develop an understanding of environmental accounting and impact assessment methodologies
- understand how there are a variety of ways of viewing and using sustainable development concepts
- develop an understanding of the potential for market-based instruments to help in addressing environmental problems.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 30% | |||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 30% | |||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 40% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
1 - Communication | |||||||
2 - Problem Solving | |||||||
3 - Critical Thinking | |||||||
4 - Information Literacy | |||||||
5 - Team Work | |||||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||||
8 - Ethical practice | |||||||
9 - Social Innovation | |||||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
Assessment Tasks | Graduate Attributes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
2 - Written Assessment - 30% | ||||||||||
3 - Written Assessment - 40% |
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- PC, Laptop, tablet or hand-held device with a camera and audio
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.ananda@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
The Economic Approach
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapters 1 and 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Understanding why environmental problems occur
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Valuing the environment
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 4
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Evaluating tradeoffs: Cost Benefit Analysis
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 3
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Dynamic efficiency and Sustainable Development
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapters 5 and 20
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Depletable Resource Allocation over longer term horizons
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 6
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Energy: the transition from depletable to renewable resources
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 7
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Forests: Storable, renewable resources
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 11
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Common Pool Resources and Fisheries
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 12
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Economics of Pollution Control and Climate Change
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapters 14 and 16
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Water Pollution
Chapter
Tietenberg and Lewis Chapter 18
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Unit revision
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Review Period
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Written Assessment 1 covers general economic concepts and environmental valuation techniques and requires short-answer responses.
As a guideline, the total length of your response should be around 1000 words.
Diagrams should be used to illustrate specific aspects of the response. Please ensure that you correctly cite/reference all sources of diagrams used, unless they are original and composed by you. This is an important aspect of academic integrity. It is also important that you familiarize yourself with the Plagiarism policy. The University Academic Misconduct Procedure Policy is available on the CQUniversity website.
Further details of the Assessment are available on the Moodle page for the unit.
Late submissions will incur penalties (5% of the total assessment marks for each day the work is overdue). All assignment extension requests must be forwarded through the Moodle Assignment Extension portal with verifiable supporting documents.
Vacation Week Monday (12 Aug 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Penalties apply to late submissions without an approved extension.
Week 7 Monday (26 Aug 2024)
Assessment Criteria for Assignment 1 are as follows:
(a) Demonstrate a clear understanding and purpose of economic theory and models.
(b) Application of economic theory and models to given real-life and hypothetical scenarios.
(c) Demonstrate a clear understanding of the selected valuation technique and its application.
(d) A critical review of the key strengths and weaknesses of the relevant valuation technique.
- identify how market mechanisms work to allocate resources, and how markets and ecological mechanisms can be viewed in a systems approach
- demonstrate that many environmental problems arise because of market failure and government failure problems, leading to inadequate signalling and incentive mechanisms used in society to allocate resources
- identify different approaches to evaluating environmental issues
- understand how valuation of environmental impacts can allow more accurate assessment of environmental issues
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
2 Written Assessment
The focus of this assignment is to test your understanding of the issues around renewable and non-renewable resources, and the issues in dealing with long time horizons. In the assignment, you should choose a major environmental issue in Australia that can be classified as a renewable or non-renewable resource management issue. Issues may be drawn from a number of areas, including Energy, Minerals, and Forestry. To complete the assignment, you should:
- Provide a brief overview of the issue
- Identify issues with the rate of resource allocation and the time horizon issues
- Explain how marginal benefits and costs of extraction or harvest can change over time
- Identify the appropriate economic analysis to identify optimal rates of harvest or extraction.
- Identify the implications of extraction or harvest rates in terms of sustainable development.
- Review available government policies to deal with these kinds of issues, and identify preferred options to address the issue of interest.
This assignment is to be written as a single essay and include diagrams and references. You should aim to develop a logical framework for your arguments in a structure that allows you to address the key questions posed.
The choice of a particular environmental issue is yours as a way of bringing some interest to the topic. Do not spend too much time describing the case but use it to demonstrate the economic principles that you have learned in the Unit.
There are many possible types of environmental issues that you might focus on. Try to narrow it down in some way to a particular case study or development proposal so that it is easier to apply different frameworks to the issue of interest. The chosen environmental issue can be at any scale (i.e. local, regional, national or international), but remember that smaller, less complex, and well-defined problems are generally easier to analyse than larger multi-faceted issues.
It is important to describe what type of economic principles and analysis can be applied to evaluate the problem so that it is clear how to conceptualise the issues in economic terms.
Other details to note are:
- As a guideline, the length of the main body of your essay should be around 2000 words or so, excluding references.
- Diagrams should be used to illustrate specific aspects and please ensure that you correctly cite/reference all sources including diagrams used since this is an important aspect of academic integrity.
- The list of references should form the last page or two, at the end of the assessment. The APA Referencing style should be used.
- Further instructions on assignment submission, formatting, referencing, etc. are provided on the Moodle site for this unit.
Week 9 Monday (9 Sept 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Week 11 Monday (23 Sept 2024)
Penalties apply to late submissions without an approved extension.
Assessment Criteria for Assignment 2 are as follows:
- Selection and description of a suitable case study issue relevant to the assignment topic
- Demonstrate a clear understanding and purpose of the economic concepts involved
- Demonstrate knowledge about application of economic analysis
- Critical evaluation of the case study issues and policy mechanisms
- Standard of writing, explanation and referencing.
- identify different approaches to evaluating environmental issues
- understand how valuation of environmental impacts can allow more accurate assessment of environmental issues
- develop an understanding of environmental accounting and impact assessment methodologies
- understand how there are a variety of ways of viewing and using sustainable development concepts
- develop an understanding of the potential for market-based instruments to help in addressing environmental problems.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
- Ethical practice
3 Written Assessment
The focus of this assignment is to identify an environmental issue that involves pollution or an open-access resource and use it as a case study to explain how the problem can be evaluated using economic analysis and to identify appropriate policy mechanisms. The case study approach means that students can choose a major environmental issue in Australia that can be classified as a common pool resource problem or a pollution problem. Common pool problems are an open-access or tragedy of the commons type of problem, while pollution problems are examples of negative externalities. Some environmental problems, such as air pollution, exhibit both characteristics and are sometimes called 'wicked' problems because of the difficulties of addressing them.
Students need to complete the following tasks for their case study:
- Provide a brief overview of the issue.
- Explain in economic terms why the problem exists, and who bears the costs.
- Identify the appropriate economic analysis that can be applied to identify more sustainable or efficient resource use.
- Review economic mechanisms that are available to address these types of environmental problems.
- Critically review current government policies that are in place and the extent to which they are consistent with economic mechanisms.
This assignment is to be written as a single essay and should include references. You should aim to develop a logical framework for your arguments in a structure that allows you to address the key questions posed.
The choice of a particular case study is yours as a way of bringing some interest to the topic. Do not spend too much time on the descriptive aspects of the case study but use it to demonstrate the economic principles that you have learned in this Unit.
There are many possible types of environmental issues that you might focus on. Try to narrow it down in some way to a particular case study or development proposal so that it is easier to apply different frameworks to the issue of interest. The case study can be at any scale (i.e. local, regional, national or international), but remember that smaller, less complex, and specific problems are generally easier to analyse than larger multi-faceted issues.
It is important to describe what type of economic principles and analysis can be applied to evaluate the problem so that it is clear how to conceptualise the issues in economic terms.
Other details to note are:
- As a guideline, the total length of the essay should be around 3000 words or so, excluding references.
- Diagrams should be used to illustrate specific aspects and please ensure that you correctly cite/reference all sources including diagrams used since this is an important aspect of academic integrity.
- The list of references should form the last page or two, at the end of the assessment. The APA Referencing style should be used.
- Further instructions on assignment submission, formatting, referencing, etc. are provided on the Moodle site for this unit.
Review/Exam Week Wednesday (9 Oct 2024) 11:45 pm AEST
Penalties apply to late submissions without an approved extension.
Please note marks and feedback will be released after the grade certification.
Assessment Criteria for Assignment 3 are as follows:
- Selection and description of a suitable case study issue relevant to the assignment topic.
- Demonstrate a clear understanding and purpose of the economic concepts involved.
- Demonstrate knowledge about the application of economic analysis.
- Critical evaluation of the case study issues and policy mechanisms.
- Standard of writing, explanation and referencing.
- demonstrate that many environmental problems arise because of market failure and government failure problems, leading to inadequate signalling and incentive mechanisms used in society to allocate resources
- understand how there are a variety of ways of viewing and using sustainable development concepts
- develop an understanding of the potential for market-based instruments to help in addressing environmental problems.
- Communication
- Problem Solving
- Critical Thinking
- Information Literacy
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.