Overview
Using real-life examples, you will examine the notion of community, voluntary participation by community members in emergency and disaster management contexts and situations and how these align with the broader volunteerism literature. You will evaluate the different models and theoretical constructs related to volunteerism and how these have changed over time. From this foundation, you will look at how the broader principles of volunteerism are applied in emergency and disaster management and look at ways in which volunteerism can be enhanced, both in the short and longer-term. By working with authentic examples, you will explore and apply your learning within your specific context or area of interest.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
The pre-requisite for the unit is DSMG28001 Foundations of Emergency and Disaster Management.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2026
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Self-reflection
To encourage independent study and thinking, include more formative activities in the learning guides. Include the use of gamification.
The unit learning guide will be enriched with expanded narratives and formative learning activities, purposefully framing the context and establishing a robust foundation to guide students through independent study. Incorporation of more interactive activities (gamification) will enhance student engagement, learning and knowledge acquisition.
Feedback from Student Feedback
The lecturer was very helpful, and this was appreciated. (SUTE Teacher Evaluation)
Continue to encourage students to interact and actively participate in weekly drop-in sessions. Recording of these sessions will provide better access for students. Timely feedback and responses to student enquiries will be continued.
- Analyse the concept of community and its nexus with emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Critique the different types of voluntary participation by individuals and groups
- Evaluate different models and theoretical constructs related to volunteerism and how these have changed over time
- Apply the principles of volunteerism to emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Collaborate with individuals and groups from within the community to enhance voluntary participation.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 20% | |||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 50% | |||||
| 3 - Presentation - 30% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Knowledge | |||||
| 2 - Communication | |||||
| 3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills | |||||
| 4 - Research | |||||
| 5 - Self-management | |||||
| 6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility | |||||
| 7 - Leadership | |||||
| 8 - First Nations Knowledges | |||||
| 9 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Zoom
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.moy@cqu.edu.au
Week 1
Begin Date: 13 Jul 2026Module/Topic
Theme One: Emergency and Disaster Management
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
WELCOME to the DSMG29006 Volunteerism and the Community!
FRIDAY JULY 17 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 2
Begin Date: 20 Jul 2026Module/Topic
Theme One: Emergency and Disaster Management
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY JULY 23 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 3
Begin Date: 27 Jul 2026Module/Topic
Theme Two: Conceptualising Community
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY JULY 30 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 4
Begin Date: 03 Aug 2026Module/Topic
Theme Two: Conceptualising Community
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY AUGUST 6 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
ASSESSMENT TASK 1 - DUE WEDNESDAY 5PM - WEEK 4.
Volunteering in Contemporary Times - Research Scoping & Annotated Bibliography Due: Week 4 Wednesday (5 Aug 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 5
Begin Date: 10 Aug 2026Module/Topic
Theme Two: Conceptualising Community
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY AUGUST 13 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 6
Begin Date: 17 Aug 2026Module/Topic
Theme Three: Conceptualising participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY AUGUST 20 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Vacation Week
Begin Date: 24 Aug 2026Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
No Drop-in session this week
Week 7
Begin Date: 31 Aug 2026Module/Topic
Theme Three: Conceptualising participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 3 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 8
Begin Date: 07 Sep 2026Module/Topic
Theme Three: Conceptualising participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 10 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
ASSESSMENT TASK 2 - DUE WEDNESDAY 5PM - WEEK 8.
Volunteering: Theoretical & Critical Evaluation Due: Week 8 Wednesday (9 Sept 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 9
Begin Date: 14 Sep 2026Module/Topic
Theme four: Enhancing community participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 17 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 10
Begin Date: 21 Sep 2026Module/Topic
Theme four: Enhancing community participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 24 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 11
Begin Date: 28 Sep 2026Module/Topic
Theme four: Enhancing community participation
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
FRIDAY OCTOBER 2 - 9am - 10am AEST (QLD time)
Week 12
Begin Date: 05 Oct 2026Module/Topic
Theme five: In your own back yard
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Online Classroom Drop-in Session.
No Drop-in Session this week
ASSESSMENT TASK 3 - DUE WEDNESDAY 5PM - WEEK 12
Future thinking in volunteerism - Final Research Project Report – PowerPoint Presentation Due: Week 12 Wednesday (7 Oct 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Exam Week
Begin Date: 12 Oct 2026Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
No Drop-in Session this week.
Vacation/Exam Week
Begin Date: 19 Oct 2026Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Written Assessment
Assessment task one (1) engages you with volunteering broadly and its enactment in emergency and disaster management and is broken into two (2) separate parts.
Part 1
- You must choose a single, specific historical or contemporary disaster event that has occurred in the past 25 years, anywhere in the world. (for example, the 2011 Brisbane floods, the NSW Black Summer Bushfires, 2019-2020, or Hurricane Katrina, 2005).
- Your chosen event must have had a considerable volunteer component as part of its response and/or recovery phases.
- Using CQUni's 7-step process, document how you have located relevant secondary literature in relation to this disaster event and its volunteer involvement.
- You must submit a search strategy table (using the template provided) showing how you used the CQU 7-step research process.
Part 2
- You must choose at least seven (7) peer reviewed articles, located as part of this CQU 7-step process, and create an Annotated Bibliography for each of these seven (7) sources. At least five (5) of these sources must be peer reviewed.
- You must identify with each of your Annotated Bibliographies, which articles are peer reviewed and which are not, and comply with the principles of an Annotated Bibliography.
- At least two of these annotated sources MUST discuss the theoretical aspects relating to volunteerism (e.g. theories of volunteering) and at least two annotated sources, MUST be empirical reports or articles, related to your chosen disaster.
Level of GenAI use allowed: Level 2 - AI PLANNING
You may use AI tools for pre-task activities such as brainstorming, planning, and initial searching. You must thoroughly review and evaluate all AI-generated content so the final output accurately reflects your own understanding, knowledge and intended meaning and you can explain and justify it when asked. You may not submit AI-generated content as part of the final submission.
STUDENTS MUST INCLUDE GEN-AI USE DECLARATION
Choose your appropriate AI declaration. Complete relevant details.
Suggested wording for AI use declaration:
AI Use Declaration (include at the bottom of your title page)
In completing this Assessment Task, I acknowledge the use of [specify the GenAI tools/platforms] to guide the [specific process/es: brainstorming, drafting, research assistance, editing, etc.]. The output from these prompts was used to [explain how the output from GenAI was critically evaluated to use in your own work]. I confirm that all AI-generated content underwent thorough review and evaluation and the final output accurately reflects my own understanding, knowledge and intended meaning. While AI assistance was used in the process, I maintain full responsibility for the content, its accuracy, and its presentation and can explain and justify all inclusions. This declaration is included to ensure transparency and to formally acknowledge the role of AI in the completion of this assessment task.
Complete this declaration if you did NOT use AI:
In completing this Assessment Task, I confirm that this work is entirely my own and I have not used any Generative AI tools. This assessment task accurately reflects my own understanding, knowledge, and intended meaning.
Week 4 Wednesday (5 Aug 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Submitted as a word document on Moodle
Week 6 Wednesday (19 Aug 2026)
The assessment criteria for this unit are in the form of a rubric, which is available from the Moodle unit site. Broadly, you will be assessed on:
- Use of the literature
- Knowledge of the concept of community and its relationship to emergency and disaster management.
- Knowledge of the different types of voluntary participation
- Analyse the concept of community and its nexus with emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Critique the different types of voluntary participation by individuals and groups
2 Written Assessment
Format: Critical Literature Review (2,500 – 3,000 words)
The Task
- Building directly upon the sources gathered in Task 1, you are to write a critical evaluation of the volunteer dynamics within your chosen disaster.
- You must analyse types of voluntary participation that occurred during the response and/or recovery of your chosen disaster event. e.g., formal emergency services vs. spontaneous, unaffiliated community volunteers)
- You must discuss what worked well and what could be done differently next time, in terms of volunteer management, volunteer roles, and volunteer responses to the disaster event.
- This critique of volunteering responses to your disaster even, must include, and link back to, existing theoretical models of volunteerism. Discuss how do these theoretical models of volunteering explain what actually happened, during and/or after your chosen disaster event.
- You are strongly encouraged to read widely and choose other additional articles (not included in your Annotated Bibliography) and use these as part of your critique of volunteerism in relation to your chosen disaster event.
Level of GenAI use allowed: Level 1 - NO AI
You must not use AI at any point during this assessment. You must demonstrate your core skills and knowledge.
Week 8 Wednesday (9 Sept 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Submitted as a word document on Moodle
Week 10 Wednesday (23 Sept 2026)
The assessment criteria for this unit are in the form of a rubric, which is available from the Moodle unit site. Broadly, you will be assessed on:
- Use of the literature
- Understanding of the different types of voluntary participation
- Application of knowledge and skills related to voluntary participation to emergency and disaster management
- Your critique of volunteerism against a real disaster event
- Critique the different types of voluntary participation by individuals and groups
- Evaluate different models and theoretical constructs related to volunteerism and how these have changed over time
- Apply the principles of volunteerism to emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Collaborate with individuals and groups from within the community to enhance voluntary participation.
3 Presentation
Your Task
- Consider your critique of volunteerism in relation to your chosen event, presented in Assessment Task 2.
- The final piece of the puzzle is the recommendations that you have considered, based upon the findings of your critique.
- Based on your critique, and your findings, you must formulate and discuss, practical, short- and long-term strategic recommendations on how emergency management agencies can better engage, coordinate, and enhance volunteer participation in a future similar disaster event.
- You are to create an 8 – 10 minute, 8 – 10 slide, PowerPoint Presentation that summarises your chosen disaster event, your critique of this event, AND shares your short-term and long-term strategic recommendation of how volunteers can be more effectively utliised in future similar disaster events.
- You must reference your work. Intext (in-slide) references and a final slide with your reference list must be included.
- You must create a PowerPoint Presentation with an embedded audio component where you speak to the slides, covering the information required above (i.e. chosen disaster, critique, future recommendations), as per the requirements below.
Presentation requirements for your PowerPoint Presentation:
- The PowerPoint presentation will have a maximum of 10 slides.
- The first slide should include the title of your presentation and your name.
- The last slide will be your reference list, based upon sources used. (sources must be identified on relevant, individual slides)
- A sample PowerPoint presentation template is provided in the Assessment section of the Moodle site.
- You must provide, and upload, a PDF of your presentation transcript along with your reference list.
- Your audio component is an expanded discussion of the topic and verbal presentation of the content from your PowerPoint slides.
- Embed the audio in your PowerPoint Presentation (see Moodle for help).
- The audio presentation will be no more than 10 minutes in length.
- You must include relevant, supporting visual images and avoid ‘Death by PowerPoint’ in your presentation.
Level of GenAI use allowed: Level 3 - AI COLLABORATION
You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.
STUDENTS MUST INCLUDE GEN-AI USE DECLARATION
Choose your appropriate AI declaration. Complete relevant details.
Suggested wording for AI use declaration:
AI Use Declaration (include at the bottom of your title page)
In completing this Assessment Task, I acknowledge the use of [specify the GenAI tools/platforms] to guide the [specific process/es: brainstorming, drafting, research assistance, editing, etc.]. The output from these prompts was used to [explain how the output from GenAI was critically evaluated to use in your own work]. I confirm that all AI-generated content underwent thorough review and evaluation and the final output accurately reflects my own understanding, knowledge and intended meaning. While AI assistance was used in the process, I maintain full responsibility for the content, its accuracy, and its presentation and can explain and justify all inclusions. This declaration is included to ensure transparency and to formally acknowledge the role of AI in the completion of this assessment task.
Complete this declaration if you did NOT use AI:
In completing this Assessment Task, I confirm that this work is entirely my own and I have not used any Generative AI tools. This assessment task accurately reflects my own understanding, knowledge, and intended meaning.
Week 12 Wednesday (7 Oct 2026) 5:00 pm AEST
Submitted as a PowerPoint and a with transcript (Word Document) in Moodle
Exam Week Wednesday (14 Oct 2026)
The assessment criteria for this unit are in the form of a rubric, which is available from the Moodle unit site. Broadly, you will be assessed on:
- Use of the literature
- Knowledge of the concept of community and of emergency and disaster management.
- Application of knowledge and skills related to voluntary participation to emergency and disaster management
- Recognition of collaboration between community and emergency and disaster management
- Presentation of relevant information
- Analyse the concept of community and its nexus with emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Evaluate different models and theoretical constructs related to volunteerism and how these have changed over time
- Apply the principles of volunteerism to emergency and disaster management contexts, settings and situations
- Collaborate with individuals and groups from within the community to enhance voluntary participation.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?