Overview
While much of the criminal justice system is oriented toward street crime there are important mechanisms that seek to regulate the crimes of the powerful including white collar crime, organised crime, institutional crime and corruption. In this unit you will examine the distinctive position of each of these forms of crime and the major hurdles they present for law enforcement and the courts. You will critically examine the different institutional responses to crimes of the powerful particularly in structures of accountability and the creation of regulatory agencies. You will also discuss emerging areas of study such as systemic inequality and generational crime. This knowledge will be applied through the development of an organisational audit or compliance plan that regulates illegal behaviour.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 2 - 2025
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Student comments.
Students sought more socially critical content in their course.
This feedback item has been passed on SHMAS who have now taken over the Criminology courses, although it is noted this unit is not continuing.
- Debate the underlying social factors that shape crimes of the powerful in Australia and internationally
- Develop an accountability-based organisational audit or compliance plan
- Discuss different regulatory approaches to crimes of the powerful
- Identify the organisational factors and structures that underpin white collar, organised and institutional crime
- Use criminology theory to evaluate the success of anti-corruption programs.
No external accreditation is relevant to this award.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Written Assessment - 50% | |||||
| 2 - Online Quiz(zes) - 20% | |||||
| 3 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Communication | |||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | |||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | |||||
| 5 - Team Work | |||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | |||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | |||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- All students must regularly check CQU university emails and read Moodle Forums and messages
- Zoom access for weekly meetings
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
j.hotten@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Introduction: Criminology's Class Divide
Chapter
Roche, D.L. & Friedrichs, D.O. (2018). Crimes of the Powerful: An Agenda for a Twenty-First Century Criminology. In W.S. Dekeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.)
Routledge Handbook of Critical Criminology, . Routledge, pp. 180-189. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.4324/9781315622040
Lynch, M.J. (2018). Conflict and Crime: Marx, Engels, Marxist/Radical Criminology, and the Explanation of Crime. In Triplett, R.A. (Ed.) The Handbook of the History
and Philosophy of Criminology. John Wiley & Sons.
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5144712&ppg=118
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
White Collar Crime I: 'Discovering' White-Collar Crime
Chapter
Jordanoska, A. & Schoultz, I. (2019). The 'Discovery' of White-Collar Crime: The Legacy of Edwin Sutherland. In M.L. Rorie & C.F. Wellford (Eds.) The Handbook of White-Collar Crime, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 3-15. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5896936&ppg=29
Benson, M.L. & Stadler, W.A. (2012). Revisiting the Guilty Mind: The Neutralisation of White-Collar Crime. Criminal Justice Review 37(4), 494-509. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1177/0734016812465618
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
White Collar Crime II: Crime or Legal Harm?
Chapter
Hillyard, P. & Tombs, S. (2007). From ‘Crime’ to Social Harm? Crime, Law & Social Change 48, 9-25. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10611-007-9079-z
Evertsson, N. (2016). Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Crime of Globalisation. Crime, Law & Social Change 66(2), 199-216.
https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10611-016-9620-z
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Political Corruption I: Grand Corruption
Chapter
Funderberk, C. (2012). Political Corruption: Causes and Consequences. In C. Funderberk (Ed.) Political Corruption in Comparative Perspective: Sources, Status and Prospects. Taylor & Francis, pp. 1-18. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5208371&ppg=16
MacWilliam, S. & Rafferty, M. (2017). From Development to Grand Corruption to Governance. International Journal for Crime, Justice & Social Democracy 6(4), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i4.443
Transparency International (2021). The Relationship Between Corruption and Protest. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Relationship-between-corruption-and-protest_2021.pdf
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Political Corruption II: 'Soft' Corruption
Chapter
Schluter, W.E. (2017). Soft Corruption: The Problem. In Soft Corruption: How Unethical Conduct Undermines Good Government and What to Do About It. Rutgers University Press, pp. 1-16. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=4789870
Graycar, A. (2017). 12: Corruption. In Deckert, A. & Sarre, R. (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand Criminology, Crime and Justice, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 251-266. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5123292&ppg=270
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 1 - Quiz 1 due (opens Monday AM, closes Sunday PM)
Module/Topic
Break Week
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Crimes of the State and International Criminal Law
Chapter
Bassiouini, M.C. (2010). Introduction: Crimes of State and Other Forms of Collective Group Violence by Non-State Actors. In Rothe et.al. (Eds.) State Crime: Current Perspectives, Rutgers University Press, pp. 1-21.
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=816482&ppg=14
Mullins, C.W. (2010). The Current Status and Role of the International Criminal Court. In Rothe et.al. (Eds.) State Crime: Current Perspectives, Rutgers University Press, pp. 275-292. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=816482&ppg=288
Kramer, R. & Michalowski, R. (2005). War, Aggression & State Crime: A Criminological Analysis of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology 45(4), 446-469. https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/stable/23639249?sid=primo
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 2 - Workbook 1 due
Module/Topic
Colonialism and Crimes of Empire
Chapter
Agozino, B. (2003). Introduction. In Counter-Colonial Criminology: A Critique of Imperialist Reason. Pluto Press, pp. 1-12. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=3386251&ppg=13
Comack, E. (2018). Corporate Colonialism and the 'Crimes of the Powerful' Committed Against the Indigenous Peoples of Canada. Critical Criminology 16(4), 455-471. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10612-018-9414-y
Michalowski, R. (2009). Power, Crime and Criminology in the New Imperial Age. Crime, Law & Social Change 51(3-4), 303-325. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10611-008-9163-z
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Who Watches the Watchers? Police Corruption and Brutality
Chapter
Punch, M. (2000). Police Corruption and its Prevention. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 8(3), 301-324. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1023/A%3A1008777013115
Cunneen, C. (2020, September 30). "The Torment of Our Powerlessness": Police Violence Against Aboriginal People in Australia. Harvard International Review. https://hir.harvard.edu/police-violence-australia-aboriginals/
McCulloch, J. & Maguire, M. (2020, November 30). Lawyer X inquiry calls for sweeping change to Victoria Police, but is it enough to bring real accountability? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/lawyer-x-inquiry-calls-for-sweeping-change-to-victoria-police-but-is-it-enough-to-bring-real-accountability-147836
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Environmental Crime and Green Criminology
Chapter
White, R. & Monod, S.W. (2017). 41: Green Criminology. In Deckert, A. & Sarre, R. (Eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand Criminology, Crime and Justice, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 617-631. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5123292&ppg=621
Bittle, S. & Hebert, J. (2019). Chapter 30: Controlling Corporate Crimes in Times of De-regulation and Re-regulation. In Rorie, M.L. & Wellford, C.F. (Eds.) The
Handbook of White-Collar Crime, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 484-498. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/reader.action?docID=5896936&ppg=510
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Corporate Crime: Wage Theft and Exploitation
Chapter
Davies, J. (2020). Criminological Reflections on the Regulation and Governance of Labour Exploitation. Trends in Organised Crime 23(1), 57-76. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.1007/s12117-019-09370-x
Friedrichs, D. (2008). Exorbitant CEO Compensation: Just Reward or Grand Theft? Crime, Law & Social Change 51(1), 45-72. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10611-008-9144-2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
State-Corporate Crime, Organised Crime, and Capitalist Political Economy
Chapter
Whyte, D. (2014). Regimes of Permission and State-
Corporate Crime. State Crime Journal 3(2), 237-246.
https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.3.2.0237
Rothe, D.L. & Kauzlarich, D. (2016). Power, Organised Crime Networks, and the Elite. In Crimes of the Powerful: An Introduction, Routledge, London, pp. 134-145.
https://doi-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.4324/9781315756776
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 2 - Workbook 2 due
Module/Topic
Recap: Towards a Power-Conscious Criminology?
Chapter
Rothe, D. & Kauzlarich, D. (2016). Chapter 5: The Symbiotic Nature of Crimes of the Powerful. Crimes of the Powerful: An Introduction. Routledge, London, pp.
65-73. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/10.4324/9781315756776
Kramer, R.C. (2016). State Crime, the Prophetic Voice and Public Criminology Activism. Critical Criminology 24(4), 519-532. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/article/10.1007/s10612-016-9331-x
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 1 - Quiz 2 due (opens Monday AM, closes Sunday PM)
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Assessment 3 - Case study due
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
1 Online Quiz(zes)
There are two online quizzes that will contain multiple choice questions about unit content, including set readings and study guides. The first quiz will take place in week 5 and will cover content from modules 1 to 5. The second quiz will take place in week 12 and will cover content from modules 6 to 11.
AI level - NO AI - You must not use AI at any point during the assessment. You must demonstrate your core skills and knowledge.
No grace period for the online quizzes.
Other
Due dates for the online quizzes are the Sundays in weeks 5 & 12.
Results and feedback will be released after each quiz week ends.
The online quizzes gauge your comprehension and engagement with the unit content. Each quiz contains 10 questions drawn randomly from a larger question pool. Questions are worth 1% each for a total of 10% in each quiz (a total of 20%).
- Identify the organisational factors and structures that underpin white collar, organised and institutional crime
- Use criminology theory to evaluate the success of anti-corruption programs.
2 Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books
There are two workbooks that will consist of weekly exercises or reflections designed to facilitate your engagement with the course material and your active participation. The first workbook will be due in week 6 and any 3 exercises/reflections will be chosen from modules 2 to 6. The second workbook will be due in week 11 and any 3 exercises/reflections will be chosen from modules 7 to 11.
AI level 3 - You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.
Due dates for the workbooks are the Fridays in weeks 6 & 11.
Feedback will be provided after the 2 week marking period.
Assessment Criteria
- Use creative problem solving in response to challenges.
- Report succinctly on challenge task activities and what you have learnt from them.
- Reflect on your learning process and set educational goals for the future.
- Understand how theories and concepts from the coursework integrate into practical and applied situations.
- Participation in group activities and supporting your peers' learning.
- Debate the underlying social factors that shape crimes of the powerful in Australia and internationally
- Develop an accountability-based organisational audit or compliance plan
- Discuss different regulatory approaches to crimes of the powerful
- Use criminology theory to evaluate the success of anti-corruption programs.
3 Written Assessment
For your final assessment, you will look into an example of a crime of the powerful relating to any one of the topics from weeks 2-11.
In Part I (~700-750 words) you will explain and analyse your chosen case. Some things you may discuss include: what sort of crime it is; what happened and who was involved; what you think caused this crime; its organisational or structural context; the power dynamics at play; the legal and regulatory framework that relates to it; the repercussions of the crime; and the consequences faced by the perpetrators (if any).
In Part II (~700-750 words) you will present a proposal for how such crimes should be dealt with going forward and improving accountability in this space. Your proposal may be preventative in nature, or it can deal with punishment. It can suggest (for example) laws and legislation, regulations or regulatory bodies, internal policy, or ways to deal with the issue in the law enforcement or the judicial system.
You may wish to base your proposal on an idea that has already been suggested by others or successfully implemented elsewhere, or you can devise your own. Either way, the important thing is that your recommendation clearly addresses the issues raised by your chosen case, identifies and fills a gap in law/regulation, and is justified by research and evidence. You should also be utilising and applying key concepts/theories/ideas from the course content and be engaging with broader discussions about how we deal with crimes of the powerful and better prevent or respond to abuses of power in society.
You must do research and include references for both Part I and Part II. References are to be formatted in APA 7 style.
AI level 3 - You may use AI to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You must critically evaluate and modify any AI-generated content you use.
Due date for the case study and proposal is in week 13.
Results and feedback will be released along with unit results on the Certification of Grades date.
Assessment Criteria
- Critical analysis of chosen case study
- Awareness of legal and regulatory frameworks that apply to chosen case
- Understanding of key concepts and ideas from the course material and the role of power in chosen case
- Critical engagement with debates on how to prevent or respond to abuses of power and ensure accountability
- Clear and succinct written expression
- Sufficient academic research and accurate referencing according to APA 7 style guide.
- Debate the underlying social factors that shape crimes of the powerful in Australia and internationally
- Develop an accountability-based organisational audit or compliance plan
- Discuss different regulatory approaches to crimes of the powerful
- Identify the organisational factors and structures that underpin white collar, organised and institutional crime
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
