Overview
In this unit you will examine the justice systems and practices of Indigenous Australian communities and their relationships with Western justice institutions. Indigenous Australian understandings of Western law and justice will also be compared to the situations and principles of international Indigenous communities. You will discuss and evaluate community justice innovations that seek to respond to Indigenous interests and to embrace Indigenous perspectives and voices. Through analysis of these innovations you will demonstrate the importance of empowering communities to find solutions to their problems. You will develop skills to identify the position of Indigenous people within the Western criminal justice system and you will develop your Indigenous cultural competency to a higher level.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
There are no requisites for this unit.
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2025
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
- Compare and contrast the key features of Indigenous justice and differences from the Western justice system
- Critically express the importance of listening to and empowering communities
- Discuss the effectiveness of Indigenous justice projects in Australia and overseas
- Evaluate innovations and programs in the Indigenous justice field
- Explore best practice for the development and implementation of Indigenous cultural competency at a professional level.
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
2 - Research Assignment - 30% | |||||
3 - Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books - 30% |
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
1 - Communication | |||||
2 - Problem Solving | |||||
3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
4 - Information Literacy | |||||
5 - Team Work | |||||
6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
8 - Ethical practice | |||||
9 - Social Innovation | |||||
10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures |
Textbooks
There are no required textbooks.
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- MS Teams
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
r.hale@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Planet Justice: Introduction to the unit
Chapter
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).
United Nations (2009) 'State of the World's Indigenous Peoples Vol 1', pp 1-11 https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/publications/state-of-the-worlds-indigenous-peoples.html
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Indigenous representation: who speaks for the 'people'?
Chapter
Maddison, S. (2010). White Parliament, Black Politics: The Dilemmas of Indigenous Parliamentary Representation. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 663–680. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_10361146_2010_517180
Harris, B. (2023). Chapter 8: The voice to parliament (p. 217-228). In Harris, B. Indigenous Peoples and Constitutional Reform in Australia: Beyond Mere Recognition (1st ed.). Springer. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_askewsholts_vlebooks_9789819971213
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Examining history: Who speaks for the past?
Chapter
Blagg, H., & Anthony, T (2019). "Postcolonial Criminology: “The Past Isn’t Over…” (pp 3-54). Decolonising Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_springer_books_10_1057_978_1_137_53247_3_2
Peters-Little., F (2010). Introduction (pp1-16). In Peters-Little, F., Curthoys, A., & Docker, J. (Eds.). (2010). Passionate histories: myth, memory and Indigenous Australia (1st ed.). ANU E Press & Aboriginal History Inc. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/33665/459436.pdf;jsessionid=6A2246E95F2AE6D31638AB644CDCB4EA?sequence=1
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Extending history: The legacy of the colonisers
Chapter
Samir Shaheen-Hussain. (2020). Chapter 11: Breaking Up Families: Child Welfare Services,
Mass Evacuations, and Medical Disappearance. In Fighting for a Hand to Hold: Confronting Medical Colonialism Against Indigenous Children in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/rpphdm/alma991001822940803441
Hand, C.A., Hankes, J., & House, T. (2012) Restorative justice: the indigenous justice system. Contemporary Justice Review, 15(4), 449-467. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_proquest_journals_1221944260
Blagg, H., Tulich, T., & Bush, Z. (2017). Indefinite Detention Meets Colonial Dispossession: Indigenous Youths with Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in a White Settler Justice System. Social & legal studies, 26(3), 333–358. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0964663916676650
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Analysing media: Images of Indigeneity
Chapter
Spiegel, S. J, Thomas, S., O'Neill, K., Brondgeest, C., Thomas, J., Beltran, J., Hunt, T., & Yassi., A. (2020). Visual Storytelling, Intergenerational Environmental Justice and Indigenous Sovereignty: Exploring Images and Stories amid a Contested Oil Pipeline Project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2362. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_webofscience_primary_000530763300194CitationCount
Albarrán‐Torres, C., & Lynch, A. (2024). Predator’s Prey: Reframing indigenous representation and Hollywood franchise cinema in the age of SVOD. Journal of Popular Culture, 57(3), 175–188.
https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_proquest_journals_3064520925
Anderson, B. (2022). “Abnormal mental health” and a blameless state-Canadian media representations of Indigenous suicide. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 15(1), 58–82.
https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_proquest_journals_2917613227
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
No class
Chapter
Please catchup on any readings you have not done
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Contemporary colonialism: The state and structural violence
Chapter
Alfred, T., & Contassel, J., (2005). Being Indigenous: resurgence against contemporary colonialism. Government and opposition, 40(4), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00166.x
Emery-Whittington, Isla G. "Occupational Justice—Colonial Business as Usual? Indigenous Observations from Aotearoa New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 88(2), 153-62. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_00084174211005891
ADDITIONAL READING [FOR EXAMPLES]
Maddison, S. (2013). Indigenous identity, “authenticity” and the structural violence of settler colonialism. Identities, 20(3), 288–303. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1070289X_2013_806267
Vincent Eagan. (2020). Structural violence in unexpected indigenous police custody deaths; Canada and Australia. Salus Journal, 8(1), 33–61. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_546230e1af614bbb992d0fc01c06e3aa
Events and Submissions/Topic
Research presentation due
Research presentation Due: Week 6 Monday (21 Apr 2025) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Space and Place: Indigenous connection to Country and continued global dispossession.
Chapter
Blagg., A., & Anthony, T. (2019). Chapter 3: Who Speaks for Place. In H., Blagg, & T., Anthony. Decolonising criminology: Imagining justice in a postcolonial world. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_springer_books_10_1057_978_1_137_53247_3_3
Bywater, E., & Fredericks, B. (2024). Country under Concrete: Enduring Indigenous Connections to Country amidst Development. M/C Journal, 27(5). https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_5204_mcj_3087
Green, D., & Minchin, L. (2014). Living on Climate-Changed Country: Indigenous Health, Well-Being and Climate Change in Remote Australian Communities. EcoHealth, 11(2), 263–272. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1539467729
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Indigenous self-determination promises and challenges
Chapter
Cornell., S. (2018) Justice as Position, Justice as Practice: Indigenous Governance at the Boundary. In S., Hendry. Indigenous Justice: New Tools, Approaches, and Spaces. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?docID=5398697.
Broderstad, E. G. (2011). The promises and challenges of indigenous self-determination: The Sami case. International Journal, 66(4), 893–907. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A279137185
ADDITIONAL READING
Billington, L. N. (2023). Colonial goals through colonial gaols: The imperative of Indigenous self-centered self-determination for Indigenous decarceration. Law, Text, Culture, 27(1), 85–120. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_rmit_collectionsjats_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_t2024050900011801981659360
Vanthuyne, K. (2021). “I Want to Move Forward. You Can Move Forward too.” Articulating Indigenous Self-Determination at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Human Rights Quarterly, 43(2), 355–377. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_hrq_2021_0023
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Indigenous victimisation: harms against Indigenous peoples globally
Chapter
De Carvalho, s., Goyes, D.R., & Vegh Weis, V. (2021). Politics and Indigenous Victimization: The Case of Brazil. The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 61 (1), 251–271. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_webofscience_primary_000606839000013CitationCount
Ewanation, L., & Maeder, E. M. (2023). Let’s (not) talk about race: comparing mock jurors’ verdicts and deliberation content in a case of lethal police use of force with a White or Indigenous victim. Psychology, Crime & Law, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–31. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_scopus_primary_2_s2_0_85161468149
ADDITIONAL READING
Nicholas, L., & Thomas., S. (2022). The natural and built rural environments as victims. In R, Hale., & A., Harkness (eds). Rural victims of crime. Taylor & Francis. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancisbooks_10_4324_9781003132691_23_version2
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Indigenous knowledge: Designing for justice
Chapter
Spencer, M. S., Fentress, T., Touch, A., & Hernandez, J. (2020). Environmental Justice, Indigenous Knowledge Systems, and Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders. Human Biology, 92(1), 45–57. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2464146545
Poiner, H., & Drake, C. (2021). Transformative or Tokenistic? Exploring the Legitimacy of Participatory Design Methods within an Indigenous Context. M/C Journal, 24(4). https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_5204_mcj_2809
ADDITIONAL READING
Liddell, J. L., Kington, S. G., & Wright, D. C. (2024). Environmental Reproductive Justice, Indigenous Health Knowledge and Indigenous Women on the Climate Frontlines. Social Justice Research, 37(4), 424–446. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_webofscience_primary_001285244600002
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Decolonisation: The way forward
Chapter
Murdoch, D. J., & McGuire, M. M. (2022). Decolonizing Criminology: Exploring Criminal Justice Decision-Making through Strategic Use of Indigenous Literature and Scholarship. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 33(3), 325–346. https://cqu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61CQU_INST/669qn3/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10511253_2021_1958883
Toi, S. (2018) Mana Wahine: Decolonizing Governance? In Hendry, E. Indigenous Justice: New Tools, Approaches, and Spaces. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cqu/detail.action?docID=5398697.
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Reflections: Applying the course learnings in practice
Chapter
Nil
Events and Submissions/Topic
Research-based pitch due
Research-based pitch Due: Week 12 Friday (6 June 2025) 11:59 pm AEST
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
No exam for this unit
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Learning journal due
Please note - This unit requires students to adhere to the guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence tools as specified in the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS). Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding the use of AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity.
1 Learning logs / diaries / Journal / log books
Worth: 30%
Length: 1800 words
Due: Week 13 (exam week)
This task requires you to maintain a learning journal at the beginning, middle and end of the term (three entries) documenting your experience of learning within the unit.
Write one entry near the beginning (around week 3-4), the middle (around week 7-8), and the end of the term (week 11-12).
Each entry should ideally be around 600 words in length. The total word limit for the journal is 1,800 words.
Your journal should be expressed through a reflective form of writing, capturing your own personal perspective. Personal prose are acceptable ("I", "my"). Your tone should still be semi-professional and appropriate for a professional context.
No references are required for this task.
Each entry is worth 10 marks determined by the quality, depth, and relevance of the entry.
JOURNAL CONTENT
The learning journal can be presented in a simple word document using three headings to mark your entries (e.g. Entry 1, Entry 2, Entry 3).
The following questions may serve as inspiration for your journal writing. You might like to try and capture these things when writing your journal throughout the term:
- What has the experience of learning about Indigenous Justice been like for you - Has it challenged you? If so, how? Why do you think this is so?
- Have there been any particular topics or issues that have stood out to you/surprised you/captured your attention? Why do you think this is so?
- Do you have a good understanding of Indigenous Justice? How would you rate your understanding? Is there a reason for this?
- Has your understanding of the key themes changed/improved/developed throughout the term? If so, how?
- What are some questions that have come up for you which you would like to explore?
- Has the unit made you consider your own position, either as an Indigenous or non-indigenous person? If so, in what ways?
- How do you engage with Indigenous knowledge? Would you like to engage more? Why?
- How does/could your learning in this unit impact you as an individual, a citizen, a scholar, a practitioner?
You are not bound by these questions and may cover other topics that are relevant to your own learning experience. It is up to you what you include in your journal, however, please ensure that it is relevant to the unit content and does not digress too far from the themes of the unit.
NOTE ON DISCLOSURE AND SELF CARE - It is important to remember that, whilst this is a reflective activity, you are not expected to disclose personal experiences or details that you are not comfortable sharing. Only the unit coordinator will read your submission. If a second marker is required, you will be notified about this to ensure you are comfortable with them reading your assignment. Should you have any concerns about this task or find it upsetting in any way, please contact the unit coordinator or another source of support, including the freely available CQU counselling service.
IMPORTANT NOTE - AI cannot be used at any point for this task. You must show your core skills and knowledge by ensuring all ideas and writing are your own. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding the use of AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity
Review/Exam Week Friday (13 June 2025) 11:59 pm AEST
Submit via the drop box on Moodle
- Quality, depth and relevance of entry one /10
- Quality, depth and relevance of entry two /10
- Quality, depth and relevance of entry three /10
- Compare and contrast the key features of Indigenous justice and differences from the Western justice system
- Critically express the importance of listening to and empowering communities
- Discuss the effectiveness of Indigenous justice projects in Australia and overseas
- Evaluate innovations and programs in the Indigenous justice field
- Explore best practice for the development and implementation of Indigenous cultural competency at a professional level.
2 Research Assignment
Worth: 30%
Length: 10-12 mins
Due: Week 6
The purpose of this assessment is to learn from First Nations communities by researching an issue from an Indigenous perspective.
First, select an issue affecting an Indigenous community from anywhere in the world. Examples will be discussed in class.
Then, conduct research into the issue/problem based on sources originating from First Nations peoples' and communities.
At least SIX different sources are required for this assignment. These can include a mixture of scholarly sources (academic journal articles, book chapters), grey literature (evaluations, project papers, annual reports), novels, creative writing, and media (videos, interviews, podcasts). As long as the source is authored/produced by Indigenous peoples and represents the perspective of First nations peoples, it can be used.
Once you have researched the issue, you must present your learnings in a 10-12 minute narrated video presentation. This can be done as audio over the top of slides/visuals or speaking directly to camera (whichever you prefer). If you require assistance with technology please contact the Academic Learning Center, TASAC, or the Unit Coordinator.
Your presentation must:
- Outline the issue clearly - what is it? where is it happening?
- Present the findings of your research - what did the research tell you about the issue? For example, how is it impacting First Nations peoples? What do First Nations peoples believe is the source of the issue? What do Indigenous peoples propose can be done about the issue? [in doing so, be sure to note where you got this information from by mentioning the source/authors' name].
- Summarise the importance of listening to and empowering First Nations communities based on your experience undertaking this task.
Submit the video file [MP4] OR a link to the YouTube video [URL] + a full reference list [word file] for marking.
PLEASE NOTE - AI may be used for planning, idea development, and research. This means you can use AI to help identify a relevant issue to choose and to locate appropriate sources of information. It cannot, however, be used to generate the content of your assignment. You must reflect your own learning and understanding of the chosen topic based on the research you have conducted.
Week 6 Monday (21 Apr 2025) 11:59 pm AEST
Submit via Moodle submission box
- Depth of engagement with First Nations perspectives /10
- Extent of understanding of the chosen issue /8
- Understanding of the aim and purpose of the assessment task /6
- Quality of presentation (including verbal presentation, slides, length) /6
- Critically express the importance of listening to and empowering communities
3 Written Assessment
WORTH: 40% of overall grade
LENGTH: 2000 words
DUE: Week 12
Using the issue you chose for your research presentation (ideally), develop a pitch about how the issue/problem can be addressed. The pitch should be grounded in Indigenous knowledge and the perspectives of First Nations communities.
First, the paper should briefly outline the issue or problem - where is it occurring? what is occurring? why is it happening? who does it impact? etc.
The crux of the paper should then focus on the pitch regarding what is required to address the issue/problem, including:
- Recommended action/s or measure/s to address the issue - what can be done?
- Required resources or infrastructure - skills/knowledge/materials/spaces/practices/policies/legislation etc.
- The risks and challenges of the approach versus the benefits - what should be considered prior to implementing? who will benefit and how?
In presenting the above, you must support your pitch with evidence and examples. Make it clear why this approach is deemed beneficial. Present any examples of initiatives/programs that have been undertaken which have shown success (and cite the sources of this information e.g. evaluations, reviews).
Be sure to include references to support your pitch, predominantly from First Nations perspectives, At least EIGHT sources should be used.
PLEASE NOTE - AI may be used to assist in planning this assessment, including researching and developing ideas. Your final assignment should show that you have refined and developed these ideas further and should be written without the assistance of generative AI. Any misuse or lack of disclosure regarding the use of AI tools will be considered a breach of academic integrity
Week 12 Friday (6 June 2025) 11:59 pm AEST
Submit via Moodle submission box
- Overview of chosen issue /5
- Quality and depth of pitch /10
- Integration of evidence and examples to support pitch /9
- Engagement with Indigenous knowledge and perspectives /9
- Quality of written piece (presentation/structure/spelling/grammar) /7
- Compare and contrast the key features of Indigenous justice and differences from the Western justice system
- Discuss the effectiveness of Indigenous justice projects in Australia and overseas
- Evaluate innovations and programs in the Indigenous justice field
- Explore best practice for the development and implementation of Indigenous cultural competency at a professional level.
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe383/fe3832c966a7b299a1c9e7915f0f7c023a16c471" alt=""