In this assessment, you will respond to a case study. This task is designed to develop your foundational academic research, writing, communication, and organisational skills, while assessing your understanding of the Australian healthcare system, ethical principles, and relevant cultural and social considerations.

Students are introduced to scenarios that reflect common professional challenges encountered across medical science–related disciplines, including pathology, biotechnology, nutrition, medicine, and clinical measurement. The ability to interpret such scenarios, identify key professional and ethical issues, and propose appropriate responses is fundamental to professional practice in health and medical science.

This assessment draws upon foundational knowledge introduced in unit modules covering ethics, professional standards, socioeconomics, and cultural competency. Students are expected to apply this knowledge in a reflective, structured, and evidence-informed manner, appropriate for first-year level study. A minimum mark of 50% is required to pass this assessment.

Detailed instructions and a marking rubric are provided on the unit Moodle site.

Level of GenAI use allowed: 

Level 3: You may use Al to assist with specific tasks such as drafting text, refining and evaluating your work. You 
must critically evaluate and modify any Al-generated content you use.

Students will be assessed on the following criteria:

1- Understanding of the Case Study Context

    - Accurate interpretation of the case study and identification of relevant professional, ethical, and contextual issues.
   

2- Application of Ethical and Professional Principles

   - Appropriate application of ethical frameworks, professional standards, and relevant policies discussed in the unit.

3-Consideration of Cultural and Social Factors

  - Demonstrated awareness of cultural, social, and socioeconomic factors relevant to the case study scenario.

4- Problem Identification and Response Development

  - Clear identification of key issues and development of appropriate, realistic, and professionally informed responses.

5- Use of Evidence and Unit Content

  - Effective use of unit materials and, where appropriate, relevant sources to support responses.

6- Academic Writing and Structure

  - Clear, well-structured written responses using appropriate academic language and conventions.

7- Organization and Clarity

  - Logical organization of ideas, clarity of expression, and adherence to assessment instructions.

8- Scientific Referencing 

  - Harvard or APA referencing style

This assessment evaluates students’ ability to demonstrate professional, safe, and effective laboratory practice, which is fundamental to success in the medical sciences. Students are assessed across four supervised practical sessions on their capacity to work safely, professionally, and collaboratively within a laboratory environment.

Assessment is conducted through direct observation by teaching staff and the completion of written and/or verbal tasks associated with laboratory activities. Students are expected to demonstrate appropriate professional behaviour, preparedness, and adherence to laboratory safety protocols throughout all practical sessions.

This assessment is conducted during the 3-hour internal practical sessions in Weeks 2–5 for internal students/ or /across two scheduled laboratory sessions in Week 8 for mixed-mode students.

As a result, assessment due dates differ by cohort. For internal students, the assessment is due in Week 6, Monday 13 April at 12:00 pm. For mixed-mode students, the assessment is due in Week 9, Monday 11 May at 12:00 pm.

Due to the practical and observational nature of this assessment, late submissions are not permitted, and a minimum mark of 50% is required to pass.

Students will be assessed on the following criteria:

1- Professional behavior and preparedness

2- Laboratory safety practices

3- Organization and workflow management

4- Completion of laboratory tasks and workbook

5- Safe and effective use of laboratory equipment

6- Chemical handling and waste disposal

7- Hazard minimization and infection control

8- Interpersonal and professional communication

This assessment requires students to develop a professional portfolio that documents and evidence skills, competencies, and achievements relevant to professional practice in medical science.

Students will construct a professional LinkedIn profile. This task is designed to support career readiness, encourage professional self-reflection, and develop your ability to effectively communicate your skills, achievements, and employability attributes to potential employers and professional networks.

The portfolio should demonstrate learning and skill development achieved throughout the unit and may include relevant artefacts, such as written assessments, reflections, certificates, skill summaries, or other evidence of professional capability. Students are encouraged to continue building and refining their portfolio throughout their degree.

A PDF version of the completed LinkedIn portfolio must be submitted via the unit Moodle site. 

Students will be assessed on the following criteria:

1- Professional identity and career alignment
2- Evidence of skills and competencies
3- Quality and relevance of artefacts
4- Reflection and skill articulation
5- Organization and presentation
6- Communication and professional tone
7- Compliance with submission requirements