Overview
This unit will introduce you to the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP) and develop your key skills for conducting EBP within clinical settings as an Allied Health Professional. You will be introduced to models of EBP that can be used to guide clinical decision making at an individual patient level and also at a service delivery level, and be required to identify the impacts of EBP on current practice across a variety of fields. During this unit you will gain experience in developing clinically answerable questions, performing information searches, undertaking critical appraisal and synthesising information.
Details
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites
Pre-requisite: ALLH11009 Research Methods for Health Professionals
Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).
Offerings For Term 1 - 2025
Attendance Requirements
All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).
Recommended Student Time Commitment
Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.
Class Timetable
Assessment Overview
Assessment Grading
This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of 'pass' in order to pass the unit. If any 'pass/fail' tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully ('pass' grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the 'assessment task' section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades.
All University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
You may wish to view these policies:
- Grades and Results Policy
- Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
- Review of Grade Procedure
- Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - Domestic Students
- Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure - International Students
- Student Refund and Credit Balance Policy and Procedure
- Student Feedback - Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
- Information and Communications Technology Acceptable Use Policy and Procedure
This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the CQUniversity Policy site.
Feedback, Recommendations and Responses
Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.
Feedback from Unit evaluation
Students found the learning resources, including the activities and extra videos very helpful to consolidate their understanding.
It is recommended that this unit continue to include extra videos and activities as part of the weekly content to consolidate students' knowledge and understanding.
Feedback from Unit evaluation
Students requested more detailed directions on how to apply assessment criteria to their discipline.
It is recommended that the Unit Coordinator discusses and give examples on how to apply assessment criteria to topics within each field of study.
- Formulate a clinical research question using the PICO (Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) format
- Plan, carry out and evaluate information searches to address specific clinical questions
- Critically appraise and evaluate the quality of original research within health professions using established critical appraisal tools
- Present a synthesised evaluation of a clinical topic using information acquired from multiple sources
- Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental evidence-based practice concepts.
N/A
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
| Assessment Tasks | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Presentation - 40% | |||||
| 2 - Written Assessment - 40% | |||||
| 3 - Online Quiz(zes) - 20% | |||||
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
| Graduate Attributes | Learning Outcomes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1 - Communication | |||||
| 2 - Problem Solving | |||||
| 3 - Critical Thinking | |||||
| 4 - Information Literacy | |||||
| 5 - Team Work | |||||
| 6 - Information Technology Competence | |||||
| 7 - Cross Cultural Competence | |||||
| 8 - Ethical practice | |||||
| 9 - Social Innovation | |||||
| 10 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures | |||||
Textbooks
Evidence-Based Practice Across the Health Professions
Edition: 4th (2023)
Authors: Hoffman, Bennett and Del Mar
Elsevier Australia
Sydney Sydney , NSW , Australia
ISBN: 9780729544436
Additional Textbook Information
Paper and eBook copies can be purchased from the CQUni Bookshop here: https://bookshop.cqu.edu.au/ (search on the Unit code)
IT Resources
- CQUniversity Student Email
- Internet
- Unit Website (Moodle)
- Zoom
All submissions for this unit must use the referencing style: American Psychological Association 7th Edition (APA 7th edition)
For further information, see the Assessment Tasks.
s.alley@cqu.edu.au
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
Module/Topic
Chapter
Events and Submissions/Topic
This unit consists of six weeks of lectorials and tutorials (weeks 1-6), and four weeks of short interviews with a health professional and tutorials (weeks 7-10).
- The lectorials involve a pre-recorded lecture alongside some interactive activities (also referred to as H5P activities). The lectures are designed to present key concepts and fundamental knowledge, whilst the interactivities are designed to further enhance your understanding. The lectorials are available at least two weeks in advance and can be completed in your own time. However, it is an expectation that you complete all of the lectorial materials prior to attending the tutorial each week.
- The health professional interviews involve a pre-recorded discussion with a health professional about applying evidence-based practice in the real world.
- The tutorials involve a live online session (via Zoom). The tutorials in weeks 1-6 are designed to provide practical applications of the key concepts and fundamental knowledge presented in the lectorials. In weeks 7- 10 we will together apply the steps of the evidence-based practice process to answer a clinical research question from the health professional interview. The tutorials provide further authentic learning experiences, thought provoking discussion and are designed to support all learning styles through fun, engaging and interactive activities.
1 Written Assessment
For this task, you are required to critically appraise one (1) journal article reporting a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT), using the CASP RCT checklist. This journal article should report results of original research and not be a review of any nature.
Please refer to the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page for additional information, including a detailed task description.
Week 7 Monday (28 Apr 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Week 10 Monday (19 May 2025)
NOTE: If your assessment is submitted after the due date, grades and feedback will be returned three (3) weeks after submission date.
For this task, you will be graded against the following criteria:
- Section A of the CASP checklist (Is the basic study design valid?).
- Section B of the CASP checklist (Was the study methodologically sound?).
- Section C of the CASP checklist (What are the results?).
- Section D of the CASP checklist (Will the results help locally?).
- Appraisal summary- Draws key points from the critical appraisal together.
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI): Within this assessment the use of Microsoft Copilot, Chat GPT or other Gen AI agents can be used to generate ideas and general structures as well as content editing, critique and review. Please reference its use as appropriate. Using AI beyond idea generation, content editing and review (i.e., to write the assessment for you) is not permitted.
IMPORTANT: It is a requirement of this assessment task that you provide a PDF copy of the Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) that you critically appraised as a part of your assessment submission. Without this document, your assessment cannot be graded, thus a fail mark will be awarded as you have not met the requirements of this task. It is your responsibility to ensure you include this information within your assessment prior to completing your assessment submission.
This assessment task has a minimum pass mark of 50%. Thus, you must pass this assessment task to be eligible to pass the unit.
Please refer to the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page for additional information, including a detailed criteria sheet.
- Formulate a clinical research question using the PICO (Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) format
- Plan, carry out and evaluate information searches to address specific clinical questions
- Critically appraise and evaluate the quality of original research within health professions using established critical appraisal tools
- Present a synthesised evaluation of a clinical topic using information acquired from multiple sources
2 Online Quiz(zes)
For this task, you are required to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of important content by completing an online content quiz.
The quiz will assess content covered during weeks 1 - 6. It will OPEN Monday Week 7 and will CLOSE Monday Week 9 (Monday 12th May 2025) 5:00 pm AEST.
You should engage with ALL week 1-6 lectorials, readily available via the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page.
1
Other
Week 9 Monday (12 May 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
The Quiz will OPEN Monday Week 7 and will CLOSE Monday Week 9
You will receive an immediate mark upon the competition of each quiz. Further insight (e.g., which specific questions you got correct and incorrect) will be available once the quiz is closed for all students.
Students are required to answer 40 multiple choice or true/false questions, and will be allocated 60 minutes to complete the quiz.
The use of AI during quizzes is not permitted, as it is likely to provide inaccurate answers and does not accurately reflect your individual understanding.
This assessment task has a minimum pass mark of 50%. Thus, you must pass this assessment task to be eligible to pass the unit.
Please refer to the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page for additional information.
- Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental evidence-based practice concepts.
3 Presentation
For this task, you are required to:
- Choose a healthcare scenario where the application of evidence-based practice is required.
- Carry out the first four steps of the evidence-based practice process (ask, access, appraise, and apply).
- Discuss your application of each step in an 8-10 minute pre-recorded presentation, using audio, visual and a PowerPoint presentation
Please refer to the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page for additional information, including a detailed task description.
Week 12 Monday (2 June 2025) 5:00 pm AEST
Please refer to the Task Description section above.
Your assessment will be returned to you within three (3) weeks. NOTE: If your assessment is not submitted in accordance with the due date, grades and feedback will be returned three (3) weeks after submission date
For this task, you will be graded against the following criteria:
- Ask: Clinical scenario, PICO, and clinical research question
- Access: Search strategy and databases searched
- Appraise: What does the evidence tell us?
- Appraise: Gaps in the evidence
- Apply: What potential patient, context, and clinical experience factors need to be considered?
- Apply: How would you act?
- Use appropriate referencing throughout presentation
- Use a variety of presentation skills to engage the audience
Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence agents (Gen AI): Within this assessment the use of Microsoft Copilot, Chat GPT or other Gen AI agents can be used to generate ideas and general structures as well as content editing, critique and review. Please reference its use as appropriate. Using AI beyond idea generation, content editing and review (i.e., to write the assessment for you) is not permitted.
This assessment task has a minimum pass mark of 50%. Thus, you must pass this assessment task to be eligible to pass the unit.
Please refer to the ALLH12006 Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals Moodle page for additional information, including a detailed criteria sheet.
- Formulate a clinical research question using the PICO (Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome) format
- Plan, carry out and evaluate information searches to address specific clinical questions
- Critically appraise and evaluate the quality of original research within health professions using established critical appraisal tools
- Present a synthesised evaluation of a clinical topic using information acquired from multiple sources
As a CQUniversity student you are expected to act honestly in all aspects of your academic work.
Any assessable work undertaken or submitted for review or assessment must be your own work. Assessable work is any type of work you do to meet the assessment requirements in the unit, including draft work submitted for review and feedback and final work to be assessed.
When you use the ideas, words or data of others in your assessment, you must thoroughly and clearly acknowledge the source of this information by using the correct referencing style for your unit. Using others’ work without proper acknowledgement may be considered a form of intellectual dishonesty.
Participating honestly, respectfully, responsibly, and fairly in your university study ensures the CQUniversity qualification you earn will be valued as a true indication of your individual academic achievement and will continue to receive the respect and recognition it deserves.
As a student, you are responsible for reading and following CQUniversity’s policies, including the Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure. This policy sets out CQUniversity’s expectations of you to act with integrity, examples of academic integrity breaches to avoid, the processes used to address alleged breaches of academic integrity, and potential penalties.
What is a breach of academic integrity?
A breach of academic integrity includes but is not limited to plagiarism, self-plagiarism, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, and academic misconduct. The Student Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure defines what these terms mean and gives examples.
Why is academic integrity important?
A breach of academic integrity may result in one or more penalties, including suspension or even expulsion from the University. It can also have negative implications for student visas and future enrolment at CQUniversity or elsewhere. Students who engage in contract cheating also risk being blackmailed by contract cheating services.
Where can I get assistance?
For academic advice and guidance, the Academic Learning Centre (ALC) can support you in becoming confident in completing assessments with integrity and of high standard.
What can you do to act with integrity?
